THE PREVALENCE OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND STAINING IN INTERIM RESTORATIONS FABRICATED WITH DIFFERENT ACRYLIC RESINS

Main Article Content

Dr. Hasham Khan
Dr. Sanam Afridi
Dr. Khola Aziz Uddin
Dr. Aamir Syed
Dr. Sana Almas
Dr. Maheen Ehsan

Keywords

Interim restorations, Provisional crowns, Surface roughness, Staining resistance, Polymethyl methacrylate, Auto polymerizing acrylic resin

Abstract

Background: Interim (provisional) restorations must maintain acceptable surface smoothness and colour stability for function and aesthetics during the provisional period. Different acrylic resins vary in polymer chemistry and processing, which may affect surface roughness and susceptibility to staining.


Objective: To compare surface roughness and staining prevalence of interim restorations fabricated with (1) conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), (2) auto polymerizing (chemically cured) PMMA, and (3) CAD/CAM-milled PMMA-based blocks.


Methods: A laboratory-based comparative study using standardized crown specimens (n = 20 per group) prepared from the three acrylic resin types. Baseline surface roughness (Ra, µm) was measured with a profilometer after finishing and polishing. Specimens then underwent thermocycling and a 7-day staining challenge (coffee). Post-challenge Ra and colour changes (ΔE00) were recorded. Surface topography was examined with SEM for a subset. Statistical comparisons used ANOVA (or Kruskal–Wallis as appropriate) with α = 0.05.


Results: CAD/CAM-milled specimens showed the lowest baseline Ra and the smallest mean colour change after staining; auto polymerizing PMMA had the highest Ra and most pronounced staining. Thermocycling and staining increased Ra in all groups, but increases were significantly larger in chemically cured PMMA (p < 0.05).


Conclusions: Material and processing significantly influence surface roughness and staining of provisional restorations. CAD/CAM-milled PMMA blocks may provide superior surface properties compared with conventional laboratory or chairside auto polymerizing resins.


 

Abstract 50 | PDF Downloads 11

References

1. Haralur SB, Albarqi AT, Alamodi AG, Alamri AA, Aldail SA, Al-Qarni MA, AlQahtani SM, Alqahtani NM. Comparison of various Surface Treatment procedures on the roughness and susceptibility to staining of Provisional Prosthodontic materials. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024 Sep 3;15(9):256.
2. Gantz L, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O. In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic resins for interim restorations before and after polishing. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021 May 1;125(5):833-e1.
3. Melo CB, Feitosa MD, Maia SD, Barreto JO, Peixoto RF, Regis RR. Effect of a continuous mechanical polishing protocol on the color stainability, microhardness, mass, and surface roughness of denture base acrylic resin. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):796-802.
4. Taşın S, Ismatullaev A, Usumez A. Comparison of surface roughness and color stainability of 3-dimensionally printed interim prosthodontic material with conventionally fabricated and CAD-CAM milled materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022 Nov 1;128(5):1094-101.
5. Mazurek-Popczyk J, Nowicki A, Arkusz K, Pałka Ł, Zimoch-Korzycka A, Baldy-Chudzik K. Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):442.
6. Aldahian N, Khan R, Mustafa M, Vohra F, Alrahlah A. Influence of conventional, CAD-CAM, and 3D printing fabrication techniques on the marginal integrity and surface roughness and wear of interim crowns. Applied Sciences. 2021 Sep 26;11(19):8964.
7. Souza LF, Pires TS, Kist PP, Valandro LF, Moraes RR, Özcan M, Pereira GK. 3D printed, subtractive, and conventional acrylic resins: Evaluation of monotonic versus fatigue behavior and surface characteristics. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2024 Jul 1;155:106556.
8. Eslemez Topcu E, Şahin O, Köroğlu A, Cömert F, Yilmaz B. Surface roughness and Streptococcus mutans adhesion on surface sealant agent coupled interim crown materials after dynamic loading. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):299.
9. Sayed ME, Jain S, Jokhadar HF, Alshahrani AA, AlResayes SS, Alqahtani SM, Alqarni H, Anab NA, Alsubeaie NH, Alsubaie SH, Khalid A. Effect of smokeless tobacco on color stability and surface roughness of CAD/CAM milled, 3D printed, and conventional provisional crown and fixed dental prosthesis materials: an in vitro study. Technology and Health Care. 2024 May;32(3):1697-711.
10. Raszewski Z, Chojnacka K, Mikulewicz M. Effects of surface preparation methods on the color stability of 3D-printed dental restorations. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023 May 5;14(5):257.
11. Kuscu HY, Kurkcuoglu I, Kucukesmen HC. The impact of gastric juice on the surface roughness of surface sealant-treated provisional restorations. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2024 Mar 1;27(3):304-9.
12. Alsharif AS. Color Stability of CAD CAM Fabricated Complete Denture After Artificial Aging-In Vitro Comparison Study (Master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo).

Most read articles by the same author(s)