THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CORE BUILD-UP MATERIALS ON THE LONGEVITY OF ENDODONTICALLY AND SURGICALLY TREATED TEETH RESTORED WITH CROWNS: A RETROSPECTIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Core build-up, Endodontically treated teeth, Crown restoration, Survival analysis, Longevity.
Abstract
Background: The selection of core build-up material is a critical factor influencing the long-term success of endodontically and surgically treated teeth restored with crowns.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of different core build-up materials on the clinical longevity and survival rate of restored teeth.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using clinical records from January 2015 to December 2022. A total of 276 teeth treated with root canal therapy or surgical endodontics and restored with crowns were analyzed. Teeth were categorized based on the core material: resin composite, glass ionomer cement (GIC), or amalgam. Survival rates were evaluated over a minimum follow-up period of three years.
Results: Teeth restored with resin composite cores demonstrated the highest survival rate (85.4%) followed by amalgam (72.2%), whereas GIC cores showed the lowest survival (61.5%) (p<0.05). Failures were predominantly due to catastrophic fractures and recurrent decay.
Conclusion: Resin composite core build-ups were associated with better longevity and clinical performance. The mechanical properties and bonding ability of composite appear to contribute to improved structural reinforcement of treated teeth.
References
2. Shaglouf AM. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of direct core build-up materials for posterior teeth. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom); 1996.
3. Yee KM. Survival Rates of Primary Endodontic Therapy Following Core/Post and Crown Placement (Master's thesis, Marquette University).
4. Aggarwal A. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Two Different Post Systems Cemented with Two Resin Cements-An in Vitro Study (Master's thesis, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).
5. Pontoriero DI, Grandini S, Spagnuolo G, Discepoli N, Benedicenti S, Maccagnola V, Mosca A, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Ferrari M. Clinical outcomes of endodontic treatments and restorations with and without posts up to 18 years. Journal of clinical medicine. 2021 Feb 25;10(5):908.
6. Li W, Zheng Z, Zeng Y, Zhou Z, Xiao P, Zhong X, Yan W. Chinese dentists’ restorative preferences and choices for endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1489.
7. Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, Bitter K, Mannocci F. The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature. International Endodontic Journal. 2021 Apr;54(4):509-35.
8. Vatankhah M, Ashraf H, Jamalian F, Talebi S, Baghban AA, Khosravi K, Zargar N. Success of Nonsurgical Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth with Complex Restorative/Prosthodontic Treatments: A Retrospective Study. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2024;19(4):263.
9. Oh SL, Kim JR, Engermann E, Shiau HJ. Survival analysis of root-resected molars from 1 to 13.4 years: A retrospective cohort study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025 Apr 1;133(4):1008-16.
10. Acharya N, Karmacharya A, Dahal S, Bhochhibhoya A, Guragain M, Sharma R. Assessment of need of prosthodontic rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth in patients attending a tertiary care center in Nepal. Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society. 2024 Dec 31;7(2):115-32.
11. Christopher VS, Ranjan M. Prevalence of age and sex in uses of custom made cast post in endodontically treated teeth–a retrospective study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(7):3257-62.
12. Gulabivala K, Ng YL. The root canal‐treated tooth in prosthodontic reconstruction. Textbook of Endodontology. 2018 Aug 6:293-314.
13. Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Valente LL, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Brazilian oral research. 2019 Feb 11;33:e012.
14. Nagadi E, Muryani A, Adang RA. Integrated Endodontic and Restorative Management of C-Shaped Canals with Severe Coronal Loss in Mandibular Second Molar: A Case Report. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2025 Dec 31:121-34.
15. Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Kattadiyil MT. Tooth retention through root canal treatment or tooth extraction and implant placement: A prosthodontic perspective. Quintessence Int. 2014 May 1;45(5):405-16.
16. Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Which materials would account for a better mechanical behavior for direct endocrown restorations?. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2020 Mar 1;103:103592.
17. Ramadhan, D.L., Wahjuningrum, D.A., Fepiosandi, R.A., Wardhani, M.D., Askandar, M.G., Pawar, A.M. and Fahreza, R.R., 2024. Comprehensive Rehabilitation Using Different Restorative Materials with Maxillary Precision Attachment, Mandibular Magnet and Implant-supported Overdenture: A Case Report. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 17(4), pp.1740-1746.
18. Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Value of root-filled teeth in maintaining a functional dentition for life. British dental journal. 2019 May;226(10):769-84.
19. Day PF, Kindelan SA, Spencer JR, Kindelan JD, Duggal MS. Dental trauma: part 2. Managing poor prognosis anterior teeth–treatment options for the subsequent space in a growing patient. Journal of Orthodontics. 2008 Sep;35(3):143-55.
