CORRELATION OF TREATMENT PLANNING PARAMETERS IN POST-MASTECTOMY BREAST CANCER FOR PERSONALIZED THERAPY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Breast cancer, dosimetry, IMRT, Conformity index, Homogeneity index
Abstract
Radiation therapy for breast cancer is rapidly evolving toward more personalized and precise treatment plans. This shift is driven by the need for better tumor targeting while minimizing exposure to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Dosimetric indices such as the Conformity Index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI), and Mismatch Index (MI) are essential in assessing treatment plans for tumor coverage. Accurate delivery also takes into account patient-specific parameters and tumor volume. This study aims to examine the correlation between these indices and OAR parameters in personalized radiation therapy. A cohort of 30 female breast cancer patients, divided equally between left- and right-sided tumors, underwent hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) planning. All patients had previously undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and were treated with a total dose of 40 Gy in 15 fractions using 6-15 MV photon energy. The treatment planning was carried out on a Varian system, with target volumes and OARs contoured according to RTOG guidelines. Key OARs included the heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, spinal cord, and contralateral breast. Students t distribution was employed to evaluate difference two groups. A moderate to strong correlation was found between the dosimetric indices and ipsilateral lung parameters in both treatment arms. For left-sided breast cancer, a strong correlation between heart-related dosimetric parameters and treatment delivery was observed. Mismatch Index presented moderate to strong correlation for both techniques, particularly in left sided breast patients. The study demonstrates a significant correlation between dosimetric indices and patient-specific OAR parameters, reinforcing the role of personalized therapy in planning and optimizing radiation delivery while ensuring protection of normal tissues.
References
2. Nuraini R, Widita R. Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) with Consideration of Cell Biological Effect. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019 Aug;1245:012092.
3. Pedram Fadavi, Mehrabian A, Soraia Salmanian, Mahdavi SR, Asghar A, Seyed Alireza Javadinia. The Relationship between Lung and Heart Two-Dimensional Parameters and Three
Dimensional Dose-Volume Data in Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2022 Feb 15;
4. Georges N, Jean-Jacques M, Pierre B. Conformity index:A review. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):333–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028 PMid:16414369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Carrie C, Ginestet C, Bey P, et al. [Conformal radiation therapy. Federation nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer (FNCLCC)] Bull Cancer. 1995;82:325–330. PMid:7626839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, Souhami L, Hirschfeld A, Dinapoli R, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group:Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
1993;27:1231–9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90548-a. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-
3016(93)90548-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Feuvret L, Noel G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index- a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:333–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028 PMid:16414369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list
8. Mayo CS, Urie MM, Fitzgerald TJ. Hybrid IMRT plans--concurrently treating conventional and IMRT beams for improved breast irradiation and reduced planning time. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics [Internet]. 2005 Mar 1 [cited 2021 Dec 29];61(3):922–32. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15708276
9. Smith W, Menon G, Wolfe N, Ploquin N, Trotter T, Pudney D. IMRT For the breast: a comparison of tangential planning techniques. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(4):1231-1241. doi:10.1088/ 0031-9155/55/4/022
10. Blom GJ, Verbakel WFAR, Dahele M, Hoffmans D, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Improving radiotherapy planning for large volume lung cancer: A dosimetric comparison between hybrid- IMRT and RapidArc. Acta Oncologica. 2014 Nov 10;54(3):427–32.
11. Raturi VP, Motegi A, Zenda S, et al. Comparison of a hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique with non-coplanar VMAT and noncoplanar IMRT for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma using the RayStation treatment planning system-EUD, NTCP and planning study. J Radiat Res. 2021;62(3):540-548. doi:10.1093/jrr/ rrab010
12. Nishimura Y, Komaki R. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: clinical evidence and techniques. Springer; 2015
13. Ahunbay, E E, Chen, G P, Thatcher, Set al. Direct aperture optimisation-based intensity- modulated radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 1248–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Descovich, M, Fowble, B, Bevan, A, Schechter, N, Park, C, Xia, P. Comparison between hybrid direct aperture optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy and forward planning intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
Phys 2010; 76: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Liu, Y. C., Chang, H. M., Lin, H. H., Lu, C. C. & Lai, L. H. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy and hybrid three- dimensional conformal radiotherapy/intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for right breast cancer. J. Clin. Med. 9, 3884 (2020).
16. Takabi, F. S., Broomand, M. A., Nickfarjam, A., Asadi, A. & Namiranian, N. Determination and comparison of dosimetric parameters of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, field in field, and intensitymodulated radiotherapy techniques in radiotherapy of breast conserving patients. J. Can. Res. Ther. 19, 624–632 (2023).
17. Petrova, D., Smickovska, S. & Lazarevska, E. Conformity index and Homogeneity Index of the postoperative whole breast radiotherapy. Open. Access. Maced J. Med. Sci. 5(6), 736–739 (2017).
18. Wang, Y., Ni, L., Ying, S. et al. Individualized estimates of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans after breast conservation surgery for left-sided breast cancer. World J Surg Onc 21, 59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02936-8
19. Schoepen, M. et al. Four irradiation and three positioning techniques for whole-breast radiotherapy: Is sophisticated always better? J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 23, e13720 (2022).
20. Mulliez, T. et al. Whole breast radiotherapy in prone and supine position: Is there a place for multi-beam IMRT? Radiat. Oncol. 8, 151 (2013).
21. Das Majumdar SK, Amritt A, Dhar SS, Barik S, Beura SS, Mishra T, Muduly DK, Dash A, Parida DK. A Dosimetric Study Comparing 3D-CRT vs. IMRT vs. VMAT in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients After Mastectomy at a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India. Cureus. 2022 Mar 28;14(3):e23568. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23568. PMID: 35494897; PMCID: PMC9045011.
22. Ghazy SG, Abdel-Maksoud MA, Saleh IA, El-Tayeb MA, Elsaid AA, Kotb MA, et al. Comparative Analysis of Dosimetry: IMRT versus 3DCRT in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients with Considering Some Organs in Out - of – Field Borders. Breast Cancer Targets and Therapy. 2024 Sep 1;Volume 16:567–82.
23. Czeremszynska, B. et al. Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for free- breathing whole-breast irradiation: a planning study. Indian J. Cancer 60, 258–265 (2023).
24. Gocer, G. P. S. & Ozer, E. E. Effect of radiotherapy on coronary arteries and heart in breast- conserving surgery: A dosimetric analysis. Radiat. Oncol. 54(1), 128–134 (2020).
25. Xie, Y., Bourgeois, D., Guo, B. & Zhang, R. Comparison of conventional and advanced radiotherapy techniques for left-sided breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Med. Dosim. 45(4), 9–16 (2020).
