ATYPICAL AND UNUSUAL PRESENTATIONS OF DERMATOPHYTOSIS—RISK FACTORS, CHRONICITY, AND RECURRENCE RATES AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN BIHAR.

Main Article Content

Dr Prem Prakash Pravakar
Dr Md Mobarak Hussain,
Dr Deepak Kumar

Keywords

Dermatophytosis, chronic tinea, recurrent tinea, steroid misuse in tinea, and antifungal resistance

Abstract

Dermatophytosis, a superficial fungal infection caused by keratinophilic fungi, has evolved from a self-limiting infection to a chronic, relapsing disease in India. The rising trend of atypical morphologies and treatment resistance has become a major public health concern. Data from Eastern India, particularly Bihar, remain scarce.


Aims:


To document atypical and unusual clinical presentations of dermatophytosis and to identify risk factors associated with chronicity and recurrence in patients attending a tertiary care centre in Bihar.


Methods:


A hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted over six months (February–July 2025) in the Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy. All consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed dermatophytosis were included. Clinical data regarding lesion morphology, duration, recurrence, comorbidities, and risk factors such as topical steroid use and hygiene practices were recorded. Fungal confirmation was done by 10% KOH and culture in doubtful cases. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and logistic regression, with p < 0.05 considered significant.


Results:


Of 788 enrolled patients, the mean age was 32 ± 7 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. The predominant forms were tinea corporis (55.7%) and tinea cruris (37%), while 26% showed atypical morphologies such as steroid-modified (21%), pseudoimbricata-like (3%), and follicular variants (2%). Chronic dermatophytosis (>6 months) was seen in 44%, and recurrence within six weeks occurred in 23%. Significant risk factors for chronicity included topical steroid misuse (p < 0.01), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.05), and positive family history (p < 0.05). Recurrence correlated with poor adherence, short treatment duration, and the presence of infected household contacts.


Conclusion:


Dermatophytosis in Bihar exhibits a high burden of chronic, recurrent, and atypical cases. Misuse of topical corticosteroid combinations, metabolic comorbidities, and familial clustering contribute significantly to persistence and relapse. Early diagnosis, regulation of steroid misuse, patient education, and antifungal resistance monitoring are essential to control this emerging epidemic.

Abstract 35 | Pdf Downloads 19

References

1. Panda S, Verma S. The menace of dermatophytosis in India: The evidence that we need. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017;83(3):281–4
2. Dogra S, Uprety S. The menace of chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis in India: Is the problem deeper than we perceive? Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7(2):73–6.
3. Saraswat N, et al. Topical corticosteroid abuse on the face: A prospective, multicenter study of dermatology outpatients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(2):160–6.
4. Narang T, et al. Regional variation in clinical presentation and antifungal susceptibility patterns of dermatophytes in India. Mycoses. 2019;62(5):400–7.
5. Lakshmanan A, et al. A clinical and epidemiological study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(5):534.
6. Singh A, et al. High terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton interdigitale isolates in India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(1):e01015-17.
7. Verma S, Madhu R. The great Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis: An appraisal. Indian J Dermatol. 2017;62(3):227–36.
8. Bhatia VK, Sharma PC. Epidemiological studies on dermatophytosis in human patients in Himachal Pradesh, India. Springerplus. 2014;3:134.
9. Chander J. Textbook of Medical Mycology. 4th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2018.
10. Rajagopalan M, Inamadar A, Mittal A, et al. Expert consensus on management of dermatophytosis in India (ECTODERM India). BMC Dermatol. 2018;18(1):6.
11. Panda S, Verma S, Rathore S, et al. Tinea pseudoimbricata: Report of 12 cases and review of literature. Mycoses. 2020;63(7):701–6.
12. Das S, De A, Saha R, et al. The current Indian epidemic of dermatophytosis: A study on causative agents and sensitivity patterns. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2020;86(2):118–24.
13. Ghosh R, et al. Clinico-mycological profile of dermatophytosis and antifungal resistance in Eastern India. Med Mycol. 2021;59(4):339–47.
14. Mahajan S, et al. Recurrent dermatophytosis: Emerging problem in India. J Fungi. 2022;8(3):230.
15. Mukherjee PK, et al. Epidemiology and management of dermatophytosis in India: A multicenter survey. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61(6):684–92.
16. Nenoff P, et al. Indian epidemic of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes type VIII. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33(2):e00015-19.
17. Singh A, Masih A, Khurana A, et al. High terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton interdigitale genotype VIII: A multicentric study. Mycoses. 2021;64(6):645–55.
18. Bishnoi A, Vinay K, Dogra S. Emergence of recalcitrant dermatophytosis in India. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):17–9.