A Comparative Study On Different Methods For MRSA, Bacteraemia, Staphylococcus aureus, mecA Detection In Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates From Bacteraemia Patients.
Main Article Content
Keywords
MRSA, Bacteraemia, Staphylococcus aureus, mecA
Abstract
Introduction: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia cases are distributed throughout the globe. There is increased mortality and morbidity in cases of MRSA bacteraemia. MRSA strains are resistant to all antibiotics related to penicillin and beta lactam groups. Detection of MRSA is challenge as there are multiple way with different sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, this study is planned to compare different ways for MRSA detection.
Material & Methods: For a period of two years June 2017 to May 2019, 162 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from blood cultures received from different critical care units were studied. MRSA was phenotypically detected by Cefoxitin Disc Diffusion, oxacillin broth microdilution, oxacillin agar diffusion methods. Genotypic detection was done by mec A, mec C PCR.
Results: Out of 162 Staphylococcus aureus isolates screened, methicillin resistance was detected in 93 (57.4%) isolates by cefoxitin disk diffusion method, 84 (51.8%) isolates by the oxacillin broth microdilution 82(50.61%) isolates by Oxacillin Agar Diffusion method. mec A was detected in 94 strains. mec C was not detected.
Conclusion: MRSA detection by Cefoxitin Disk diffusion testing is reliable as genotyping detection is difficult to be done in the resource constraint setting.
References
Crossref
2. Skov R, Larsen AR, Kearns A, et al. Phenotypic detection of mecC-MRSA: cefoxitin is more reliable than oxacillin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(1):133-135.
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement M 100-S24. 2014;34 Wayne, PA, USA Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
4. Andrews J. M. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2001;48(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standardrs Institute. CLSI Document M07-A9. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard-Ninth Edition. Wayne, Pa, USA: CLSI; 2012.
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. NCCLS approved standard M100-S9. NCCLS; Wayne, PA, U.S.A: 1999. [Google Scholar]
7. Wehrhahn, M.C. ∙ Robinson, J.O. ∙ Pearson, J.C. Clinical and laboratory features of invasive community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: a prospective case-control study Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010; 29:1025-1033
8. Epidemiology of Panton Valentine Leukocidin in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates - A prospective study at a tertiary care centre in North India Jaiswal, Rani et al. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, Volume 15, 101006
9. Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2240–4
10. Ananl K, Agrawal P, Kumar S, Kapila K. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27:27–29.
11. Skov R, Larsen AR, Kearns A, et al. Phenotypic detection of mecC-MRSA: cefoxitin is more reliable than oxacillin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(1):133-135.
12. Farahani A, Mohajeri P, Gholamine B, et al. Comparison of different phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. North American Journal of Medical Sciences 2013;5(11):637-40

