SKIN PREPARATION FROM CHLORHEXIDINE SCRUB VERSUS POVIDONE-IODINE IN THE PREVENTION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Chlorhexidine; Povidone-Iodine; Surgical Site Infection; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the leading preventable complication of gynecologic surgery. We aimed to determine whether adding a 2 % chlorhexidine scrub to standard 10 % povidone-iodine painting lowers 30-day SSI after gynecologic operations.
Methodology: In a single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 408 women aged 18–45 years scheduled for elective or emergency gynecologic surgery at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, were randomly assigned (1:1) to pre-incision skin preparation with either 2 % chlorhexidine scrub plus 10 % povidone-iodine (Group A) or 10 % povidone-iodine alone (Group B). All participants received 1 g intravenous ceftriaxone 30 minutes before incision. Patients were reviewed daily until postoperative day 5 and weekly until day. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 25.
Results: Baseline demographics and comorbidities were well balanced. SSI developed in 10/204 women (4.9 %) in Group A versus 23/204 (11.3 %) in Group B, corresponding to a 57 % relative risk reduction (p = 0.018). Superficial infections predominated while deep/organ-space events were uncommon (p = 0.582). Median time to SSI was similar (p = 0.442), and re-operation rates were low. Subgroup analyses showed consistently lower infection rates with the combined regimen.
Conclusion: Incorporating a brief chlorhexidine scrub before povidone-iodine painting halves 30-day SSI after gynecologic surgery, offering a simple, cost-effective enhancement to routine preoperative care.
References
2. Jin J, ′ Akau′ ola S, Yip C-H, Nthumba P, Ameh EA, de Jonge S, et al. The impact of quality improvement interventions in improving surgical infections and mortality in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2021;45(10):2993-3006.
3. Ching PR. Care bundles in surgical site infection prevention: a narrative review. Current Infectious Disease Reports. 2023;26(6):163-72.
4. Calderwood MS, Anderson DJ, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Garcia-Houchins S, Maragakis LL, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2023;44(5):695-720.
5. Yang Z, Wang D, Yang M, Deng J, Liu Y. Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients undergoing obstetrics and gynecology surgeries: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Plos one. 2024;19(3):e0296193.
6. Edmiston Jr CE, Bond-Smith G, Spencer M, Chitnis AS, Holy CE, Chen BP-H, et al. Assessment of risk and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) posthysterectomy using a US longitudinal database. Surgery. 2022;171(5):1320-30.
7. Hoang TPN, Ghori MU, Conway BR. Topical antiseptic formulations for skin and soft tissue infections. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(4):558.
8. Wang P, Wang D, Zhang L. RETRACTED: Effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus povidone‐iodine for preventing surgical site wound infection: A meta‐analysis. International Wound Journal. 2024;21(2):e14394.
9. Fuglestad MA, Tracey EL, Leinicke JA. Evidence-based prevention of surgical site infection. Surgical Clinics. 2021;101(6):951-66.
10. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA surgery. 2017;152(8):784-91.
11. Hill AM, Pauls RN, Basil J, Tam T, Yook E, Shatkin-Margolis A, et al. Chlorhexidine versus iodine for vaginal preparation before hysterectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urogynecology. 2022;28(2):77-84.
12. Skeith AE, Morgan DM, Schmidt PC. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before hysterectomy: a propensity score matched analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2021;225(5):560. e1-. e9.
13. Bai D, Zhou F, Wu L. RETRACTED: Comparing the efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone–iodine in preventing surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International wound journal. 2024;21(2):e14463.
14. Petca A, Rotar IC, Borislavschi A, Petca R-C, Danau RA, Dumitrascu MC, et al. Adapting surgical ‘bundles’ to prevent surgical site infections in obstetrics and gynecology. Experimental and therapeutic medicine. 2022;24(5):695.
15. Singh P, Gothwal M, Pradhan HK, Yadav G, Gupta MK. Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after obstetrics and gynecological abdominal surgery: A quality improvement project. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2022;48(3):824-9.
16. Gupta KK, Vatish D, Xavier V, Maliyil J, Manu M. Comparing surgeon adherence with World Health Organization antiseptic guidelines for surgical site preparation in the United Kingdom and India. Surgical Infections. 2020;21(7):634-8.
17. Cruz-Bendezu A, Whalen MJ. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Open and Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery. Infections in Urology, An Issue of Urologic Clinics of North America: Infections in Urology, An Issue of Urologic Clinics, E-Book. 2024;51(4):445.
18. Elsharydah B, Rasmussen J, Crossley K, Takata E, Patel S. Comparison of Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine for Preoperative Skin Preparation in Orthopedic Surgery: A Literature Review. Ameri J Clin Med Re: AJCMR-218. 2024.
19. Planz V, Huang J, Galgano SJ, Brook OR, Fananapazir G. Variability in personal protective equipment in cross-sectional interventional abdominal radiology practices. Abdominal Radiology. 2022;47(3):1167-76.
20. Boisson M, Allain G, Roussel J-C, D’ostrevy N, Burbassi S, Demondion P, et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine-alcohol skin antisepsis protocols in major cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Medicine. 2023;50(12):2114-24.
21. Wade RG, Burr NE, McCauley G, Bourke G, Efthimiou O. The comparative efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone-iodine antiseptics for the prevention of infection in clean surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. LWW; 2021. p. e481-e8.
22. Yang Q, Sun J, Yang Z, Rastogi S, Liu Y-f, Zhao B-b. Evaluation of the efficacy of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs. aqueous/alcoholic iodine solutions for the prevention of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery. 2023;110(11):7353-66.
23. Rockefeller NF, Petersen TR, Komesu YM, Meriwether K, Dunivan G, Ninivaggio C, et al. Chlorhexidine gluconate vs povidone-iodine vaginal antisepsis for urogynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;227(1):66. e1-. e9.
24. Widmer AF, Atkinson A, Kuster SP, Wolfensberger A, Klimke S, Sommerstein R, et al. Povidone iodine vs chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol for preoperative skin antisepsis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;332(7):541-9.
25. Rozycki SK, Nguyen V, Miroballi N, Rutledge EC, Balk EM, Antosh DD. Vaginal antiseptic preparation at the time of hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024.
