ASSESSING THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND MAMMOGRAPHY IN DETECTING BREAST MASSES: A CLINICAL CORRELATION WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS

Main Article Content

Keywords

Breast lumps, Ultrasound diagnosis, Histopathology, BI-RADS classification, Accuracy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography and mammography as a primary diagnostic tool for breast masses.


Methodology: This retrospective  study involved 90 women aged 20 to 80 years with palpable breast lumps admitted in Services Hospital Lahore from 1st January 2020 to 30thJanuary 2022. Medical records of patients who underwent ultrasound or mammography and histopathological evaluation were systematically reviewed. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board vide letter No. IRB/2024/1496/SIMS dated 17-12-2024. The data was collected with information extracted on socio-demographic, clinical, and imaging findings, keeping identity of patient anonymous. Data were analyzed applying descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test for correlations, and the Kappa statistic to assess agreement between ultrasound and histological findings.


Results: Majority patients were between 20-30 years (21.1%). Most participants were married (41.1%) or single (38.9%), and 76.7% were housewives. In terms of breast lump characteristics, 98.9% had unilateral lumps, and 94.4% had a single lesion. Oval-shaped lumps were most common (83.3%), and 80% had irregular outlines, often associated with malignancy. The BI-RADS classification showed 52.2% as BI-RADS 4 (suspicion of malignancy), and 24.4% as BI-RADS 5 (high suspicion). Needle biopsy was performed in 93.3% of cases. The Kappa value of 0.479 indicated moderate agreement between ultrasound and histology, with a p-value of 0.000, showing significant correlation. While ultrasound is useful, histopathology remains the gold standard for diagnosis.


Conclusion: The overall efficacy of breast ultrasound and mammography in distinguishing between breast lumps was satisfactory; however, the prevalence of discordant cases underscores the necessity of clinical, radiological and pathological correlation to minimize diagnostic errors

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021, 71:209-49.
2. Akinnibosun-Raji HO, Saidu SA, Mustapha Z, Ma'aji SM, Umar M, Kabir FU, Udochukwu UG, et al. Correlation of sonographic findings and histopathological diagnoses in women presenting with breast masses. J West Afr Coll Surg 2022;12(2):109-14.
3. Fakhri N, Chad MA, Lahkim M, Houari A, Dehbi H, Belmouden A, El Kadmiri N. Risk factors for breast cancer in women: an update review. Med Oncol 2022;39(12):197.
4. Wender RC, Brawley OW, Fedewa SA, Gansler T, Smith RA. A blueprint for cancer screening and early detection: Advancing screening’s contribution to cancer control. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69(1):50-79.
5. Odedina SO, Ajayi IO, Adeniji-Sofoluwe A, Morhason-Bello IO, Huo D, Olopade OI, et al. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of breast disorders detected by clinical breast examination during pregnancy and six months postpartum in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. BMC Women’s Health 2018;18:152.
6. Malherbe F, Nel D, Molabe H, Cairncross L, Roodt L. Palpable breast lumps: An age-based approach to evaluation and diagnosis. S Afr Fam Pract (2004) 2022;64(1):e1-e5.
7. Adam A, Dixon AK. Grainger and Allison's diagnostic radiology. A Textbook of Medical Imaging. 5th ed. London: Elsevier (Churchill Livingstone); 2008; 1173–8.
8. Naz N, Malik K. Different appearances of breast masses on high frequency ultrasound. Pak J Surg 2012;28:65-9.
9. Obajimi MO, Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT, Adedokun BO, Soyemi TO, Bassey OS. Sonographic breast pattern in women in Ibadan Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2014;13:145–50.
10. Rahul S, Manjula HV, Ashok K. Step by Step Breast Ultrasound. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Medical Publishers Ltd; 2006; 4-75.
11. Kohn TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of the screening mammography physical examination and breast ultrasound and evaluation of the factors that influence them. Radiology 2012;235:165–75.
12. Freitas SLC, Furtado JXA. Correlation between ultrasonographic features and histopathologic findings of breast lesions in biopsies. Mastology 2017;27:225-9.
13. Obajimi MO, Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT, Soyemi TO, Oluwasola AO, Afolabi AO, et al. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy of breast lesions in Ibadan: Our initial experience. J Clin Sci 2015;12:3–8.
14. Ahmed SB, Kadhim TJ. Diagnostic Sharpness of Ultrasound guided needle True-Cut biopsy in diagnosis of breast lesions. Mustansiriya Med J 2016;15(1):65-9.
15. Eng YC, Engoumou AM, Awana AP, Onembele SP, Ntsama JA, Zeh OF. Histopathological and ultrasound correlation in women presenting with breast lumps in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Open J Radiol 2023;13(04):218-31.
16. Bello N, Olarinoye-Akorede SA, Mohammed HM, Aliyu I, Abdullahi MZ, Ibrahim MZ, et al. The correlation of sonographic and histopathologic findings in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses in Zaria. J West Afr Coll Surg 2023;13:74-8.
17. Nairuz T, Lee D, Lee JH. Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system based on mass irregularity features in frequency domain. Appl Sci 2024;14(17):8003.
18. Ali EA, Ahmed AM, Elsaid NA. The added advantage of auto mated breast ultrasound to mammographically detected different breast lesions in patients with dense breasts. Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med 2020;51(59):1-10.
19. Thomas R, Das SK, Balasubramanian G, Chandrappa A. Correlation of mammography, ultrasound and sonoelastographic findings with histopathological diagnosis in breast lesions. Cureus 2022;14:e32318.
20. Christina, Angel E. Radiological and cytological correlation of breast lesions with histopathology: a study in a tertiary care centre. Int J Clin Diagn Pathol 2021;4(1):170-3.
21. Elverici E, Barça AN, Aktaş H, Özsoy A, Zengin B, Çavuşoğlu M, et al. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015;21(3):189-94.
22. Lu Z, Hao C, Pan Y, Mao N, Wang X, Yin X. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus ultrasonography: diagnostic performance in symptomatic patients with dense breasts. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:442-9.
23. Ghafoor L, Hajian A, Hamidian Y, Rohani SH. Concordance and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography findings with pathology results in breast cancer. Arch Breast Cancer 2020;7:127-31.