E-LEARNING PLATFORMS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: A QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL LEARNING IN PESHAWAR

Main Article Content

Dr Hafiza Rabail Ali
Dr habiba Hanan
Dr Muhammad Suleman
Hanzala Waqar
Palwasha zahid
Dr Farrukh ali

Keywords

Abstract

E-learning platforms have become central to medical education globally. Yet, their comparative effectiveness versus traditional teaching in resource-limited contexts like Peshawar remains underexplored.


Objective: To quantitatively compare perceptions and outcomes of online and traditional learning among undergraduate medical students in Peshawar.


Design: Quantitative, cross-sectional comparative study.


Methods: Data were collected via a structured questionnaire from 300 medical students who had experienced both online and face-to-face learning at Khyber Medical University and affiliated colleges. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to assess perceptions, satisfaction, and self-reported academic performance.


Results: Students rated online learning higher for flexibility and accessibility, while traditional learning was preferred for interactivity and clinical skill acquisition. No significant difference was observed in self-reported knowledge outcomes between both modes (p > 0.05). Blended learning yielded the highest satisfaction.


Conclusion: E-learning is equally effective as traditional learning for knowledge acquisition but less suitable for developing hands-on clinical skills. A blended-learning model is recommended to optimize medical education outcomes in Peshawar.

Abstract 64 | PDF Downloads 19

References

1. Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538.
2. Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e16504.
3. Malau-Aduli M, ACHIEVE Collaboration. Digital learning of clinical skills and its impact on medical students: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:1477.
4. Usman S, et al. The cognitive and psychosocial effects of online learning in medical education in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25.
5. Voutilainen A, et al. Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching: randomized trial in health-care education. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23.
6. Hoogland J, et al. Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025252.
7. World Health Organization. Digital education for building health workforce capacity. Geneva: WHO; 2025.
8. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
9. Ayub Medical College Journal. Undergraduate students’ perception and satisfaction regarding online learning during COVID-19; ethics via Northwest General Hospital & Research Centre, Peshawar. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020.
10. Khyber Medical University (KMU). Institute of Health Professions Education & Research (IHPER). Peshawar: KMU; 2025.
11. Iqbal S, et al. Cross-sectional study of medical students’ perceptions of e-learning during COVID-19 (Pakistan–Iran collaboration). Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022.
12. Chen J, et al. Self-directed learning versus traditional didactic learning in undergraduate medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24.
13. Balla M, et al. Learning effect of online versus onsite education in health and medical education: systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24.
14. Cook DA, et al. Can online learning be a reliable alternative to traditional learning for nursing students? Nurse Educ Today. 2023.
15. Zhang S, et al. Online simulation versus traditional classroom learning in pharmacy education: multicentre randomized controlled study. BMC Med Educ. 2025.
16. Theobald S, et al. The effectiveness of blended learning in nursing and medical education: an overview of reviews. Nurse Educ Pract. 2025.