E-LEARNING PLATFORMS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: A QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL LEARNING IN PESHAWAR
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
E-learning platforms have become central to medical education globally. Yet, their comparative effectiveness versus traditional teaching in resource-limited contexts like Peshawar remains underexplored.
Objective: To quantitatively compare perceptions and outcomes of online and traditional learning among undergraduate medical students in Peshawar.
Design: Quantitative, cross-sectional comparative study.
Methods: Data were collected via a structured questionnaire from 300 medical students who had experienced both online and face-to-face learning at Khyber Medical University and affiliated colleges. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to assess perceptions, satisfaction, and self-reported academic performance.
Results: Students rated online learning higher for flexibility and accessibility, while traditional learning was preferred for interactivity and clinical skill acquisition. No significant difference was observed in self-reported knowledge outcomes between both modes (p > 0.05). Blended learning yielded the highest satisfaction.
Conclusion: E-learning is equally effective as traditional learning for knowledge acquisition but less suitable for developing hands-on clinical skills. A blended-learning model is recommended to optimize medical education outcomes in Peshawar.
References
2. Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e16504.
3. Malau-Aduli M, ACHIEVE Collaboration. Digital learning of clinical skills and its impact on medical students: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:1477.
4. Usman S, et al. The cognitive and psychosocial effects of online learning in medical education in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25.
5. Voutilainen A, et al. Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching: randomized trial in health-care education. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23.
6. Hoogland J, et al. Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025252.
7. World Health Organization. Digital education for building health workforce capacity. Geneva: WHO; 2025.
8. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
9. Ayub Medical College Journal. Undergraduate students’ perception and satisfaction regarding online learning during COVID-19; ethics via Northwest General Hospital & Research Centre, Peshawar. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020.
10. Khyber Medical University (KMU). Institute of Health Professions Education & Research (IHPER). Peshawar: KMU; 2025.
11. Iqbal S, et al. Cross-sectional study of medical students’ perceptions of e-learning during COVID-19 (Pakistan–Iran collaboration). Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022.
12. Chen J, et al. Self-directed learning versus traditional didactic learning in undergraduate medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24.
13. Balla M, et al. Learning effect of online versus onsite education in health and medical education: systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24.
14. Cook DA, et al. Can online learning be a reliable alternative to traditional learning for nursing students? Nurse Educ Today. 2023.
15. Zhang S, et al. Online simulation versus traditional classroom learning in pharmacy education: multicentre randomized controlled study. BMC Med Educ. 2025.
16. Theobald S, et al. The effectiveness of blended learning in nursing and medical education: an overview of reviews. Nurse Educ Pract. 2025.
