POSTOPERATIVE URINARY COMPLICATIONS IN MAJOR ABDOMINAL SURGERY: INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS, AND UROLOGIC INTERVENTIONS: CLINICAL PRACTICE AND A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Main Article Content

Dr. Cemoon Effendi
Dr. Amna Aziz
Dr. Abdul Rauf
Dr. Abdul Rauf
Dr. Nawaid Farooque Khan
Dr. Amber Shams

Keywords

.

Abstract

Postoperative urinary complications (PUCs) remain an under-recognized yet clinically significant cause of morbidity following major abdominal surgery. This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the incidence, risk factors, pathophysiology, and management of postoperative urinary retention (POUR), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and detrusor dysfunction. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000–2024) identified 31 high-quality studies involving over 45,000 surgical patients. The pooled incidence of PUCs ranged from 7% to 25%, with POUR being the most prevalent. Risk factors included advanced age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, prolonged operative time, neuraxial anesthesia, high perioperative fluid administration, opioid analgesia, and delayed mobilization. Evidence supports preventive strategies such as routine bladder scanning, time-bound catheter removal, opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, and early ambulation. Implementation of standardized urinary care pathways reduced complication rates by up to 50% and decreased hospital stay by 1–2 days. Despite progress, heterogeneity in definitions and outcome measures limits data comparability. Multidisciplinary collaboration and standardized guidelines are essential to reduce PUC incidence, optimize resource use, and improve surgical recovery outcomes.

Abstract 55 | PDF Downloads 22

References

1. Baldini G., Bagry H., Aprikian A., & Carli F. (2009). Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology, 110(5), 1139–1157.
2. Mason S. E., Scott A. J., Mayer E., & Purkayastha S. (2016). Patient-related risk factors for urinary retention following ambulatory general surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg, 212(3), 475–483.
3. Wu A. K., Auerbach A. D., & Aaronson D. S. (2012). National incidence and outcomes of postoperative urinary retention. Am J Surg, 204(2), 167–171.
4. Simşek Y. Z., & Karaöz S. (2016). Postoperative urinary retention and nursing approaches. Int J Caring Sci, 9(2), 1154–1164.
5. Yaban Z. Ş., & Karaöz S. (2019). Postoperative urinary retention: Review of literature. World J Nephrol, 8(1), 1–9.
6. O’Reilly M., et al. (2021). Catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention program in surgical patients. BMJ Open Quality, 10(1), e001201.
7. Wang W., Marks-Anglin A., & Turzhitsky V. (2024). Economic impact of postoperative urinary retention. J Health Econ Outcomes Res, 11(2), 29–34.
8. Knight M., Kenyon S., Brocklehurst P., & Kurinczuk J. (2021). Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit.
9. Perioperative Medicine Journal. (2020). Postoperative urinary retention: risk factors and bladder filling rate. Perioper Med, 9(1), 12–18.
10. Omar M. I., Fisher E., et al. (2022). Medical and non-medical interventions for post-operative urinary retention: Systematic review. BJS Open, 3(1), 11–25.
11. Tammela T., et al. (2022). Efficacy of alpha-blockers in prevention of postoperative urinary retention. Urology, 160(2), 78–83.
12. Knight J. D., & Morrison P. (2019). Early catheter removal and postoperative outcomes. Ann Surg, 270(5), 1022–1028.
13. Auerbach A., & Johnson S. (2020). Multidisciplinary approaches to urinary complications. Urology Practice, 7(4), 215–223.*
14. StatPearls. (2023). Postoperative urinary retention. StatPearls Publishing.American Family Physician. (2018). Urinary retention in adults: evaluation and management. AFP, 98(6), 496–503.

Most read articles by the same author(s)