“QUANTIFYING POLY PHARMACOLOGY: SCORING FUNCTIONS AND COMPOSITE INDICES FOR AD MTDLS”

Main Article Content

Honey Patel
Dr. Nishkruti R. Mehta
Dr. Ashish Mishra
Dr. Pregnesh Patni

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease, multi-target directed ligands (MTDLs), Polypharmacology, Scoring functions, Composite indices, Network pharmacology, Drug discovery, Computational modeling, Neurodegeneration, Artificial intelligence

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex, multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder characterized by amyloid-β aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. The failure of single-target therapies has shifted attention toward multi-target directed ligands (MTDLs), which aim to modulate multiple pathological pathways simultaneously. A critical challenge in developing and evaluating MTDLs lies in quantifying their degree of polypharmacology—how effectively a compound engages multiple targets with therapeutic relevance. Scoring functions and composite indices have emerged as promising approaches to measure and compare polypharmacological profiles. These methods integrate binding affinity data, pharmacokinetic parameters, and network-based interactions into numerical descriptors that capture both the breadth and balance of target modulation. Computational scoring functions, such as docking-based affinity predictions and machine learning models, allow rapid in silico assessment of polypharmacological potential. Meanwhile, composite indices combine multiple criteria—efficacy, selectivity, drug-likeness, and safety—to provide holistic evaluations of candidate molecules. In the context of AD, such metrics can guide the rational design and prioritization of MTDLs targeting cholinesterases, NMDA receptors, monoamine oxidases, and amyloidogenic proteins. Furthermore, polypharmacology scoring can help predict off-target liabilities and optimize therapeutic windows. This review highlights the methodological advances in quantifying polypharmacology, discusses their application in AD drug discovery, and proposes future perspectives on integrating systems biology, network pharmacology, and artificial intelligence for more precise evaluation of MTDLs. By refining these scoring strategies, researchers can accelerate the identification of safe and effective multi-target therapeutics, offering renewed hope in the battle against Alzheimer’s disease.

Abstract 21 | PDF Downloads 2

References

1. Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Comprehensive Review on Alzheimer's Disease: Causes and Treatment. Molecules. 2020 Dec 8;25(24):5789.
2. Kashif M, Sivaprakasam P, Vijendra P, Waseem M, Pandurangan AK. A Recent Update on Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Interventions of Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2023;29(43):3428-3441.
3. Trejo-Lopez JA, Yachnis AT, Prokop S. Neuropathology of Alzheimer's Disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Jan;19(1):173-185.
4. Thal DR, Poesen K, Vandenberghe R, De Meyer S. Alzheimer's disease neuropathology and its estimation with fluid and imaging biomarkers. Mol Neurodegener. 2025 Mar 14;20(1):33
5. Singh D. Astrocytic and microglial cells as the modulators of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2022 Aug 17;19(1):206.
6. Thakur S, Dhapola R, Sarma P, Medhi B, Reddy DH. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's Disease: Current Progress in Molecular Signaling and Therapeutics. Inflammation. 2023 Feb;46(1):1-17.
7. Picconi B, Piccoli G, Calabresi P. Synaptic dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012; 970:553-72.
8. Twarowski B, Herbet M. Inflammatory Processes in Alzheimer's Disease-Pathomechanism, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 30;24(7):6518.
9. Richartz-Salzburger E, Stransky E, Laske C, Köhler N. Vorzeitige Immunalterung: ein pathogenetischer Faktor bei Alzheimer-Demenz? [Premature immunosenescence: a pathogenetic factor in Alzheimer's disease?]. Nervenarzt. 2010 Jul;81(7):837-43.
10. Lin RR, Jin LL, Xue YY, Zhang ZS, Huang HF, Chen DF, Liu Q, Mao ZW, Wu ZY, Tao QQ. Hybrid Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles for Precise Targeting and Synergistic Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Jun;11(24): e2306675.
11. Zheng X, Zhang C, Guo Q, Wan X, Shao X, Liu Q, Zhang Q. Dual-functional nanoparticles for precise drug delivery to Alzheimer's disease lesions: Targeting mechanisms, pharmacodynamics and safety. Int J Pharm. 2017 Jun 15;525(1):237-248.
12. Zheng X, Pang X, Yang P, Wan X, Wei Y, Guo Q, Zhang Q, Jiang X. A hybrid siRNA delivery complex for enhanced brain penetration and precise amyloid plaque targeting in Alzheimer's disease mice. Acta Biomater. 2017 Feb; 49:388-401.
13. Li Y, Pereda Serras C, Blumenfeld J, Xie M, Hao Y, Deng E, Chun YY, Holtzman J, An A, Yoon SY, Tang X, Rao A, Woldemariam S, Tang A, Zhang A, Simms J, Lo I, Oskotsky T, Keiser MJ, Huang Y, Sirota M. Cell-type-directed network-correcting combination therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 2025 Jul 15: S0092-8674(25)00737-8.
14. Kumar B, Thakur A, Dwivedi AR, Kumar R, Kumar V. Multi-Target-Directed Ligands as an Effective Strategy for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Med Chem. 2022;29(10):1757-1803.
15. Kumar N, Kumar V, Anand P, Kumar V, Ranjan Dwivedi A, Kumar V. Advancements in the development of multi-target directed ligands for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Bioorg Med Chem. 2022 May 1; 61:116742.
16. Wang F, Li Y, Shen H, Martinez-Feduchi P, Ji X, Teng P, Krishnakumar S, Hu J, Chen L, Feng Y, Yao B. Identification of pathological pathways centered on circRNA dysregulation in association with irreversible progression of Alzheimer's disease. Genome Med. 2024 Nov 11;16(1):129.
17. Zafarjafarzadeh N, Feridouni E, Sobhani-Moghaddam S, Amini J, Mollazadeh S, Ataei R, Ghomi H, Beyer C, Sanadgol N. Dynamics and role of covalently closed circular RNAs in Alzheimer's disease: A review of experimental and bioinformatics studies. Neurobiol Aging. 2025 Jul; 151:54-69.
18. Regier M, Liang J, Choi A, Verma K, Libien J, Hernández AI. Evidence for Decreased Nucleolar PARP-1 as an Early Marker of Cognitive Impairment. Neural Plast. 2019 Nov 19; 2019:4383258.
19. Zeng J, Libien J, Shaik F, Wolk J, Hernández AI. Nucleolar PARP-1 Expression Is Decreased in Alzheimer's Disease: Consequences for Epigenetic Regulation of rDNA and Cognition. Neural Plast. 2016; 2016:8987928.
20. Smieszek A, Marycz K, Szustakiewicz K, Kryszak B, Targonska S, Zawisza K, Watras A, Wiglusz RJ. New approach to modification of poly (l-lactic acid) with nano-hydroxyapatite improving functionality of human adipose-derived stromal cells (hASCs) through increased viability and enhanced mitochondrial activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 May; 98:213-226.
21. Iqbal S, Malik MZ, Pal D. Network-based identification of miRNAs and transcription factors and in silico drug screening targeting δ-secretase involved in Alzheimer's disease. Heliyon. 2021 Nov 29;7(12):e08502.
22. Yılmaz ŞG, Erdal ME, Özge AA, Sungur MA. Can Peripheral MicroRNA Expression Data Serve as Epigenomic (Upstream) Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease? OMICS. 2016 Aug;20(8):456-61.
23. Singh A, Singh D, Tiwari N, Mittal P, Siddiqui MH, Mittal N. Exploring the therapeutic potential of rosemary compounds against Alzheimer's disease through GC-MS and molecular docking analysis. In Silico Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 17;12(2):63.
24. Ji Q, Chen J, Li Y, Tao E, Zhan Y. Incidence and prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;39(7):701-714.
25. Ossenkoppele R, van der Kant R, Hansson O. Tau biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: towards implementation in clinical practice and trials. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Aug;21(8):726-734.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>