OUTCOME OF EARLY VERSUS DELAYED LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS AT TERTIARY CARE CENTRE, KARACHI

Main Article Content

Dr. Hira Moosa
Dr. Syed Baqir Rizvi
Dr. Aman Khan
Dr. Shabina Jaffar
Dr. Nargis Shaikh
Dr. Anum Iftikhar

Keywords

Gallstone disease, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Acute cholecystitis, Operative time, Hospital stay duration, Bile leak.

Abstract

Introduction:


Gallstone disease is common across the world, with varied frequency in various locations. The conventional therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), however the scheduling of operation is still controversial. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) yields better clinical results than delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) for acute cholecystitis. Conversion to open cholecystectomy during LC is a significant consequence, and patients with comorbidities, advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, and low albumin levels are at higher risk. Studies show that ELC is safe, reduces hospital stays, and lowers costs compared to DLC.


Aims & Objective:


The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes like bile leak, mean operation time, hospital stay duration, and conversion between patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Methods: 


An observational study was conducted on surgical ward two at Karachi, Pakistan's Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) between October 2020 and October 2022. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were considered for the study. Patients were split into two groups: Group A underwent surgery within seven days of the acute incident, while Group B waited 6-8 weeks after the acute incident to have surgery. Operative duration, hospital stay, bile leak, and rate of conversion were all recorded for both groups. To examine the information, we used SPSS 28.


Results:


The study included patients with a mean age of 42.15, ranging from 18 to 70. In Group A, 16.3% were men, 83.3% were women, while in Group B, 9.5% were men, and 90.5% were women. The mean operative duration in Group A was 98.42 ± 46.25 minutes; the mean hospital duration was 2.47 ± 1.08 days; conversion occurred in 4 (9.5%) patients, and bile leak occurred in 11.9% of patients. In Group B, the mean operative time was 73.28 ± 27.81 minutes, the mean hospital stay was 2.45 ± 1.06 days, and bile leak occurred in 1(2.4%) patient.


Conclusion:


Group B had significantly shorter mean surgical durations, lower rates of bile leakage, and lower rates of conversion to open cholecystectomy than Group A, despite there being no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stays between the two groups.

Abstract 34 | PDF Downloads 15

References

1. Nimanya S, Ocen W, Makobore P, Bua E, Ssekitooleko B, Oyania F. Prevalence and risk factors of gallstone disease in patients undergoing ultrasonography at Mulago hospital, Uganda. Afr Health Sci [Internet]. 2020 Apr 23 [cited 2023 Jul 3];20(1):383. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7750090/
2. Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2023 Jul 3];7(2):132–40. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15802102/
3. Gallstones - NHS [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.nhs. uk/conditions/gallstones/
4. The Growing Global Burden of Gallstone Disease | World Gastroenterology Organisation [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.worldgastroenterology.org/ publications/e-wgn/e-wgn-expert-point-of-view-articles-collection/the-growing-global-burden-of-gallstone-disease
5. Gallstones (Cholelithiasis): Symptoms, Causes & Treatment [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 3]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/7313-gallstones
6. Agrawal R, Sood KC, Agarwal B. Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis. Surg Res Pract [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Jul 3];2015:1–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25729775/
7. Kohga A, Suzuki K, Okumura T, Yamashita K, Isogaki J, Kawabe A, et al. Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution. Asian J Endosc Surg [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Jul 3];12(1):74–80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29611896/
8. Kao LS, Ball CG, Chaudhury PK. Evidence-based Reviews in Surgery: Early Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 3];268(6):940–2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29916874/
9. Özkardeş AB, Tokaç M, Dumlu EG, Bozkurt B, Çiftçi AB, Yetişir F, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study. Int Surg [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 Jul 3];99(1):56–61. Available from: https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24444271/
10. Goh JC, Tan JK, Lim JW, Shridhar IG, Madhavan K, Kow AW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an analysis of early versus delayed cholecystectomy and predictive factors for conversion. Minerva Chir [Internet]. 2017 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Jul 3];72(6):455–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28621510/
11. Kumar R, Mahi SS, Walia R, Goyal S. Comparison between early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A prospective study. MedPulse International Journal of Surgery. 2019;12(3):74–9.
12. Janjic G, Simatovic M, Skrbic V, Karabeg R, Radulj D. Early vs. Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis - Single Center Experience. Medical Archives [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2023 Jul 4];74(1):34. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7164737/
13. Kao LS, Ball CG, Chaudhury PK. Evidence-based Reviews in Surgery: Early Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 4];268(6):940–2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29916874/
14. Chhajed R, Dumbre R, Fernandes A, Phalgune D. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a comparative study. International Surgery Journal [Internet]. 2018 Sep 25 [cited 2023 Jul 4];5(10):3381–5. Available from: https://www.ijsurgery.com/index.php/isj/article/view/3316
15. Kohga A, Suzuki K, Okumura T, Yamashita K, Isogaki J, Kawabe A, et al. Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution. Asian J Endosc Surg [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Jul 4];12(1):74–80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29611896/
16. Wang L, Yu H feng, Guo T, Xie P, Zhang Z wei, Yu Y hong. Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis with Mild Pancreatitis. Curr Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1 [cited 2023 Jul 4];40(5):937–42. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33123907/
17. Yousaf M, Shah MN, Afridi SK. Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat [Internet]. 2022 Jun 14 [cited 2023 Jul 4];12(2):75–8. Available from: https://jsmc.pk/index.php/jsmc/article/view/664
18. Imbisat MZ, Rizvi SAA, Ali I. An evaluation of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. International Surgery Journal [Internet]. 2019 Aug 28 [cited 2023 Jul 4];6(9):3147–51. Available from: https://www.ijsurgery.com/index. php/isj/article/view/4784