APPENDICULAR STUMP MANAGEMENT IN OPEN APPENDECTOMY: SIMPLE LIGATION VERSUS INVERSION.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Appendicular stump, Ligation, Stump invagination, Open surgery
Abstract
Background: Management of the appendicular stump in open appendectomy remains debated, with simple ligation and stump invagination being the most commonly used techniques. This study aimed to compare these two methods in terms of operative duration, complications, and hospital stay.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted over two years (November 2020–October 2022) in 256 patients undergoing open appendectomy for acute appendicitis or appendicular perforation. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (simple ligation, n=128) and Group B (ligation with stump invagination, n = 128). Outcomes measured included operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.
Results: Retrocecal appendix was the most common position (62%). Appendicular perforation occurred in 23.43% of patients. Pyrexia was observed in 21.9% of Group A and 21.8% of Group B. Wound infection occurred in 10.1% and 10.9%, while wound dehiscence was 4.7% and 0.01%, respectively. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in Group A (41.11 ± 3.26 minutes) compared to Group B (51.4 ± 3.47 minutes), whereas hospital stay was similar between groups.
Conclusion: Simple ligation of the appendicular stump is a safe, effective, and time-efficient technique in open appendectomy, with comparable complication rates to stump invagination. Stump invagination offers no significant clinical advantage and prolongs operative time.
References
2. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.
3. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15(2):59–64.
4. Saha SK. Invagination of the appendicular stump: a reappraisal. Br J Surg. 1977;64(7):499–500.
5. Golash V. Simple ligation vs stump invagination in open appendicectomy: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(6):408–10.
6. Howard FM. The treatment of the stump in appendicectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1924;39:311–5.
7. Aravind R, Ramanujam S, Arumugam D. Comparative study of appendicular stump management: simple ligation versus stump inversion. Int Surg J. 2019;6(7):2391–6.
8. Akbar MT, Arif M, Yasir M, Tariq U, Javed S. Stump invagination versus simple ligation in open appendicectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Cureus. 2021;13(2):e13338.
9. Ates M, Dirican A, Ince V, Ara C, Isik B, Yilmaz S. Comparison of simple ligation, stump invagination, and stapler closure techniques for appendiceal stump closure. World J Surg. 2012;36(2):431–5.
10. Podda M, Gerardi C, Cillara N, Fearnhead N, Gomes CA, Birindelli A, et al. Antibiotics-first strategy vs surgery for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):238–49.
11. Qian Z, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.
12. Ellis BE, et al. Acute appendicitis. In: Ellis BW, Paterson-Brown S, editors. Hamilton Bailey's Emergency Surgery, 13th edition. London: Hodder Arnold; 2007. p. 399–400.
13. Azhagiri A, Anitha S. Prevalence of anatomical variations of the position of the appendix: a study in a South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(7):AC01–AC04.
14. Gopalreddy D, Jadhav DL, Kannavar S. Hyperbilirubinemia as a diagnostic tool in patients with perforated appendicitis: a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(5):PC01–PC04.
15. Naqvi R, Singh G, Saroch T, Trakroo S. Traumatic gastrointestinal perforation following abdominal trauma: a study in tertiary care centre. Int Surg J. 2022;9:1446. doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221898