“PREVALENCE OF SECONDARY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS AND ADENOVIRUS CO-DETECTION IN RECENT SPORADIC OUTBREAKS OF CONJUNCTIVITIS IN LUCKNOW, INDIA: A MICROBIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR STUDY”
Main Article Content
Keywords
secondary bacterial infections, adenovirus, conjunctivitis, polymerase chain reaction
Abstract
Background: Acute infectious conjunctivitis remains a significant public health burden, particularly in tropical regions like India. While viral agents, especially adenoviruses, are frequently implicated in large-scale outbreaks, the role of primary and secondary bacterial infections in sporadic cases is often underestimated, leading to potential mismanagement. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of bacterial pathogens and their co-infection with adenovirus in patients presenting with conjunctivitis during a recent sporadic outbreak in and around Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients clinically diagnosed with infectious conjunctivitis. Conjunctival swabs were collected aseptically from each patient. Samples were processed for bacterial culture using standard microbiological techniques on three media: Sheep Blood Agar, Chocolate Agar, and MacConkey Agar. Isolates were identified based on colony morphology, Gram staining, and biochemical tests. Furthermore, 10 samples were selectively sent for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing for adenovirus detection.
Results: Out of 50 samples processed, 30 (60%) showed no bacterial growth. Among the culture-positive samples (20, 40%), Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most prevalent organism, isolated from 12 patients (24% of total, 60% of positive cultures), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae, isolated from 8 patients (16% of total, 40% of positive cultures). No other bacterial pathogens were isolated. From the 10 samples subjected to PCR, 2 (20%) tested positive for adenovirus. Both adenovirus-positive samples were from the culture-negative group.
Conclusion: This study highlights a high prevalence (40%) of bacterial involvement in sporadic conjunctivitis cases in Lucknow, predominantly caused by commensal bacteria like S. epidermidis and classic pathogens like S. pneumoniae. The absence of adenovirus in culture-positive samples suggests distinct etiologies. These findings underscore the critical importance of microbiological diagnosis to guide appropriate, targeted antibiotic therapy, thereby avoiding the empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and mitigating the risk of antimicrobial resistance.
References
2. Sheikh, A., Hurwitz, B., & van Schayck, C. P. (2012). Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9).
3. Kaneko, H., et al. (2018). Adenovirus-mediated conjunctivitis. Journal of Clinical Virology, 106, 23-28.
4. Jhanji, V., et al. (2015). Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis. Survey of Ophthalmology, 60(5), 435-443.
5. Cronau, H., Kankanala, R. R., & Mauger, T. (2010). Diagnosis and management of red eye in primary care. American Family Physician, 81(2), 137–144.
6. Rietveld, R. P., et al. (2004). Predicting bacterial cause in infectious conjunctivitis: cohort study on informativeness of combinations of signs and symptoms. BMJ, 329(7459), 206–210.
7. Ueta, M. (2018). Innate immunity of the ocular surface and ocular surface inflammatory disorders. Cornea, 37, S66–S71.
8. Carr, W., et al. (2018). Antibiotic resistance in ocular bacterial infections: a systematic review. Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, 13(2), 169–175.
9. Panda, A., et al. (2009). Microbial profile of corneal ulcers in a tertiary care hospital in North India. Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology, 52(2), 211–215.
10. Bharathi, M. J., et al. (2007). Microbial keratitis in South India: influence of risk factors, climate, and geographical variation. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 14(2), 61–69.
11. Wilhelmus, K. R. (2000). The dilemma of corticosteroid use in viral conjunctivitis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 84(8), 794–795.
12. Allard, A., et al. (2001). Rapid typing of human adenoviruses by a general PCR combined with restriction endonuclease analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(2), 498–505.
13. Woodland, R. M., et al. (1992). The commonest cause of acute conjunctivitis? The Lancet, 340(8825), 908-909.
14. Kuo, I. C. (2017. Viral Conjunctivitis. In: Mannis M.J., Holland E.J., eds. Cornea. 4th ed. Elsevier.
15. Becker, K., et al. (2014). Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 27(4), 870–926.
16. Garg, P., et al. (1999). Microbial spectrum and susceptibility of isolates in acute conjunctivitis: a study from North India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 47(2), 95–99.
17. Kaliamurthy, J., et al. (2013). Spectrum of bacterial keratitis at a tertiary eye care centre in India. BioMed Research International, 2013, 181564.
18. Arciola, C. R., et al. (2012). Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials, 33(26), 5967–5982.
19. Cavuoto, K. M., et al. (2018). Bacterial and viral conjunctivitis in children. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 29(5), 442–446.
20. Tarai, B., et al. (2006). Recurrent challenges for clinicians: emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin resistance, and current treatment options. Journal of Laboratory Physicians, 5(2), 71–78.
21. Visscher, K. L., et al. (2009). Evidence-based treatment of acute infective conjunctivitis: Breaking the cycle of antibiotic prescribing. Canadian Family Physician, 55(11), 1071–1075.