NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT FOR LATE ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION IN CHILDREN
Main Article Content
Keywords
Esophageal, pediatric, mediastinitis , children
Abstract
Background: Even today, esophageal perforation remains a lethal medical condition with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. We encountered numerous pediatric cases of esophageal perforation that presented in late time. This study examined vigorous conservative approaches to get the maximum benefit from forceful pleural contamination irrigation without taking them to surgery.
Methods: Between 2013 and 2020, 21 patients who had esophageal perforations that were discovered 24 hours after the event were treated. Perforations were found in the esophageal parts of the neck, thorax, and abdomen. The causes of perforation were traumatic in 3 cases, post-corrosive in 6 cases and iatrogenic in 12 cases
Results: Conservative treatment was provided to each of the twenty one patients. There was only one death record (4.8%) in a post-corrosive perforation case. Twenty out of twenty-one patients (95.2%) are survived without undergoing surgery. Only one case required surgery because the abdominal portion of the esophagus had developed a perforation.
Conclusions: Effective treatment of sepsis with a chest drain and irrigation, together with the placement of a nasogastric tube for feeding, reduces mortality, avoids potential peri-operative complications, and improves the likelihood of esophageal healing. Esophageal perforation remains a well-known devastating complication, with higher death rates in late presented cases. A number of studies recommended an aggressive surgical strategy to manage this issue, such as vigorous surgical drainage, primary esophageal resection, 2-stage resection and/or esophagostomy, or primary surgical repair. We discovered that extensive conservative treatment might produce superior results than documented surgical cases.
References
2. Barrett NR. Report of a case of spontaneous rupture of esophagus successfully treated by operation. Br J Surg 1947; 38:216-217.
3. Iqbal CW, Askegard-Giesmann JR, Pham TH, Ishitani MB, Moir CR. Pediatric endoscopic injuries: incidence,management, and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43:911–915.
4. Mengoli LR, Klasser KP. Conservative management of oesophageal perforation. Arch Surg 1968; 91:238-240.
5. Schweigert M, Sousa HS, Solymosi N, et al. Spotlight on esophageal perforation: A multinational study using the Pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151(4):1002-9.
6. Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Pennathur A, Landreneau J, Landreneau J, et al. Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery. 2009; 146:749-55; discussion 755-6.
7. Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL. Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality, Ann Surg. 2005 Jun; 241(6): 1016–1023.
8. Martinez L, Rivas S, Hernandez F, et al. Aggressive conservative treatment of esophageal perforations in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38:685–689.
9. Eliçevik M, Alim A, Tekant GT, Sarimurat N, Adaletli I, Kurugoglu S, et al. Management of esophageal perforation secondary to caustic esophageal injury in children. Surg Today. 2008; 38(4):311–5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-007-3638-x.
10. Mishra B, Singhal S, Aggarwal D, Kumar N, Kumar S. Non operative management of traumatic esophageal perforation leading to esophagocutaneous fistula in pediatric age group: review and case report. World J Emerg Surg 2015; 10:19.
11. Gupta NM, Kaman L. Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg. 2004; 187:58–63.
12. Goldstein LA, Thompson WR. Esophageal perforations—a 15 year experience. Am J Surg 1982; 143:495-503?
13. Lawrence DR, Ohri S, Moxon RE, Townsend ER, Fountain SW. Iatrogenic oesophageal perforations: a clinical review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80:115-118.
14. Ivatury RR, Moore FA, Biffl W, Leppeniemi A, Ansaloni L, Catena F, et al. Oesophageal injuries: position paper, WSES, 2013. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-9.
15. Seres DS, Valcarcel M and Guillaume A. Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013; 6(2): 157–167.
16. Lyons WS, Seremetis MG. Ruptures and perforations of the esophagus: the case for conservative supportive management. Ann Thorac Surg. 1978; 25:346–50. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)63554-0.
17. Santos GH, Frater RW. Transesophageal irrigation for treatment of mediastinitis produced by esophageal rupture. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986; 91:57–62.
18. Cameron JL, Kieffer RF, Hendrix TR, Mehigan DG, Baker RR. Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979; 27(5):404–8. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)63335-8.
19. Altorjay A, Kiss J, Voros A, et al: Non operative management of esophageal perforations: is it justified? Ann Surg. 1997; 225(4):415–21. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00011.
20. Soreidel JA, Asgaust V. Scand J trauma esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision making in the first 24 hours. Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19:66. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-66.
21. A Ismail, D Rafaat. Conservative Management Of Delayed Presenting Pediatric Esophageal Perforation. The Internet Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019 Volume 21 (1).