RISK STRATIFICATION AND MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE AFTER INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKAEMIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Minimal residual disease, Risk stratification, Cytogenetics, Induction chemotherapy.
Abstract
Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous malignancy where treatment outcomes depend on multiple prognostic factors. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring following induction chemotherapy has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing response and refining risk stratification. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Haematology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from July 2021 to June 2022. A total of 86 newly diagnosed ALL patients were enrolled. Diagnosis was based on morphology, cytochemistry, immunophenotyping and cytogenetics. All patients received standard induction chemotherapy and MRD status was assessed post-induction. Associations between MRD outcome, risk stratification and cytogenetic profiles were analyzed. Results: Among 86 patients, 48 (55.8%) were categorized as standard risk and 38 (44.2%) as high risk. Post-induction MRD analysis showed that 54 patients (62.8%) achieved MRD negativity, while 32 (37.2%) remained MRD-positive. A significant association was found between risk group and MRD outcome: 83.3% of standard-risk patients achieved MRD negativity compared to 36.8% of high-risk patients (p < 0.001). Cytogenetics also influenced outcomes: favorable abnormalities had the highest MRD negativity rate (88.9%), unfavorable abnormalities showed poor clearance with 75.0% MRD positivity, while normal/other profiles yielded intermediate results (p = 0.002). Conclusion: MRD assessment after induction therapy provides critical prognostic information in ALL. Standard-risk and favorable cytogenetic patients were more likely to achieve MRD negativity, whereas high-risk and unfavorable groups demonstrated persistent disease. Incorporating MRD monitoring can enhance risk stratification and guide post-induction treatment decisions.
References
2. Vora A, Goulden N, Mitchell C, Hancock J, Hough R, Rowntree C, Moorman AV, Wade R. Augmented post-remission therapy for a minimal residual disease-defined high-risk subgroup of children and young people with clinical standard-risk and intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial. The lancet oncology. 2014 Jul 1;15(8):809-18.
3. Hu YX, Lu J, He HL, Wang Y, Li JQ, Xiao PF, Li J, Lv H, Sun YN, Fan JJ, Chai YH. A prospective evaluation of minimal residual disease as risk stratification for CCLG-ALL-2008 treatment protocol in pediatric B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2016 May 1;20(9).
4. Campana D, Pui CH. Minimal residual disease–guided therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2017 Apr 6;129(14):1913-8.
5. O’Connor D, Moorman AV, Wade R, Hancock J, Tan RM, Bartram J, Moppett J, Schwab C, Patrick K, Harrison CJ, Hough R. Use of minimal residual disease assessment to redefine induction failure in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):660-7.
6. Bassan R, Intermesoli T, Scattolin A, Viero P, Maino E, Sancetta R, Carobolante F, Gianni F, Stefanoni P, Tosi M, Spinelli O. Minimal residual disease assessment and risk-based therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia. 2017 Jul 1;17:S2-9.
7. Schrappe M, Bleckmann K, Zimmermann M, Biondi A, Möricke A, Locatelli F, Cario G, Rizzari C, Attarbaschi A, Valsecchi MG, Bartram CR. Reduced-intensity delayed intensification in standard-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia defined by undetectable minimal residual disease: results of an international randomized trial (AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018 Jan 20;36(3):244-53.
8. Vora A, Goulden N, Wade R, Mitchell C, Hancock J, Hough R, Rowntree C, Richards S. Treatment reduction for children and young adults with low-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia defined by minimal residual disease (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial. The lancet oncology. 2013 Mar 1;14(3):199-209.
9. Schrappe M, Zimmermann M, Möricke A, Mann G, Valsecchi MG, Bartram CR, Biondi A, Panzer-Grümayer R, Beier R, Cario G, Locatelli F. Reduced intensity delayed intensification in standard-risk patients defined by minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of an international randomized trial in 1164 patients (Trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000). Blood. 2016 Dec 2;128(22):4.
10. O’Connor D, Enshaei A, Bartram J, Hancock J, Harrison CJ, Hough R, Samarasinghe S, Schwab C, Vora A, Wade R, Moppett J. Genotype-specific minimal residual disease interpretation improves stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):34-43.
11. Berry DA, Zhou S, Higley H, Mukundan L, Fu S, Reaman GH, Wood BL, Kelloff GJ, Jessup JM, Radich JP. Association of minimal residual disease with clinical outcome in pediatric and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis. JAMA oncology. 2017 Jul 1;3(7):e170580-.
12. Eckert C, von Stackelberg A, Seeger K, Groeneveld TW, Peters C, Klingebiel T, Borkhardt A, Schrappe M, Escherich G, Henze G. Minimal residual disease after induction is the strongest predictor of prognosis in intermediate risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia–long-term results of trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96. European journal of cancer. 2013 Apr 1;49(6):1346-55.
13. Bartram CR, Schrauder A, Köhler R, Schrappe M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: treatment planning via minimal residual disease assessment. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2012 Oct 5;109(40):652.
14. Borowitz MJ, Wood BL, Devidas M, Loh ML, Raetz EA, Salzer WL, Nachman JB, Carroll AJ, Heerema NA, Gastier-Foster JM, Willman CL. Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in high risk B-ALL: a report from Children’s Oncology Group study AALL0232. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2015 Aug 20;126(8):964-71.
15. Galimberti S, Devidas M, Lucenti A, Cazzaniga G, Möricke A, Bartram CR, Mann G, Carroll W, Winick N, Borowitz M, Wood B. Validation of minimal residual disease as surrogate endpoint for event-free survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JNCI cancer spectrum. 2018 Oct;2(4):pky069.
16. Pieters R, de Groot-Kruseman H, Van der Velden V, Fiocco M, van den Berg H, De Bont E, Egeler RM, Hoogerbrugge P, Kaspers G, Van der Schoot E, De Haas V. Successful therapy reduction and intensification for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on minimal residual disease monitoring: study ALL10 from the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. Journal of clinical oncology. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2591-601.
17. Beldjord K, Chevret S, Asnafi V, Huguet F, Boulland ML, Leguay T, Thomas X, Cayuela JM, Grardel N, Chalandon Y, Boissel N. Oncogenetics and minimal residual disease are independent outcome predictors in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2014 Jun 12;123(24):3739-49.
18. Roberts KG, Pei D, Campana D, Payne-Turner D, Li Y, Cheng C, Sandlund JT, Jeha S, Easton J, Becksfort J, Zhang J. Outcomes of children with BCR-ABL1–like acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with risk-directed therapy based on the levels of minimal residual disease. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3012-20.
19. Yeoh AE, Ariffin H, Chai EL, Kwok CS, Chan YH, Ponnudurai K, Campana D, Tan PL, Chan MY, Kham SK, Chong LA. Minimal residual disease–guided treatment deintensification for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the Malaysia-Singapore acute lymphoblastic leukemia 2003 study. Journal of clinical oncology. 2012 Jul 1;30(19):2384-92.
20. Liao C, Xu X, Shen D, Song H, Xu W, Zhao F, Yang S, Shi S, Liang J, Li S, Tang Y. Minimal Residual Disease–guided Risk Restratification and Therapy Improves the Survival of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Experience From a Tertiary Children’s Hospital in China. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 2019 Aug 1;41(6):e346-54.
21. Modvig S, Madsen HO, Siitonen SM, Rosthøj S, Tierens A, Juvonen V, Osnes LT, Vålerhaugen H, Hultdin M, Thörn I, Matuzeviciene R. Minimal residual disease quantification by flow cytometry provides reliable risk stratification in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2019 Jun;33(6):1324-36.
22. Eckert C, Henze G, Seeger K, Hagedorn N, Mann G, Panzer-Grümayer R, Peters C, Klingebiel T, Borkhardt A, Schrappe M, Schrauder A. Use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation based on minimal residual disease response improves outcomes for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the intermediate-risk group. Journal of clinical oncology. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2736-42.
23. Lovisa F, Zecca M, Rossi B, Campeggio M, Magrin E, Giarin E, Buldini B, Songia S, Cazzaniga G, Mina T, Acquafredda G. Pre‐and post‐transplant minimal residual disease predicts relapse occurrence in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. British Journal of Haematology. 2018 Mar;180(5):680-93.
24. Bassan R, Brüggemann M, Radcliffe HS, Hartfield E, Kreuzbauer G, Wetten S. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of minimal residual disease as a prognostic indicator in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2019 Mar 19;104(10):2028.
