POSTPARTUM INSERTION OF INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES: A STUDY ON EXPULSION RATES, ADVERSE EVENTS, AND PATIENT COMPLIANCE.

Main Article Content

Dr. Ameena Munirahmed Shaikh
Dr. Saral G Bhatia
Dr. Nilam Prajapati
Dr. Madhuli Biren Mayani
Dr. Nitinkumar Hadiya
Dr. Urmish Virendrabhai Patel

Keywords

Intrauterine Devices; Postpartum Period; Postpartum; Contraceptive Devices; Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices.

Abstract

Background: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion is an effective strategy to address the unmet need for contraception and to reduce the risk of closely spaced pregnancies, which are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, side effects, and complications of PPIUCD insertions in a tertiary care center.


Method: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center and included 250 postpartum women who accepted PPIUCD insertion within 48 hours of delivery after counseling and consent. Women with contraindications as per WHO category 3 and 4 were excluded. CuT 380A was inserted either post-placental following vaginal delivery or during cesarean section by trained doctors using aseptic techniques. Participants were followed at 6 weeks and 3 months to assess complications, side effects, expulsions, removals, and continuation. Data were analyzed using SPSS with descriptive statistics and chi-square test, considering p<0.05 as significant.


Results: A total of 250 women underwent PPIUCD insertion, with a mean age of 24.1 ± 3.9 years. Follow-up was achieved in 85.6%. The most common complaints were bleeding (32.7%) and pain (18.6%). Expulsion occurred in 9.8%, mostly after vaginal delivery. Removal was done in 13.5%, mainly for side effects or preference. The 3-month continuation rate was 76.6%, significantly higher after cesarean than vaginal delivery (p<0.001).


Conclusion: PPIUCD is a safe and effective postpartum contraceptive with high continuation and minimal complications. Counseling, skilled insertion, and follow-up are key, and efforts should focus on reducing expulsions, especially after vaginal delivery.


 

Abstract 46 | Pdf Downloads 7

References

1. Awaga HA, Abdel-Mawjud MA, Ismail MS, Ahmed SR. Clinical outcomes of post-placental insertion of Copper T380A and Multiload 375 contraceptive devices during cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2024; 29(1):32.
2. Whitaker AK, Chen BA. Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of in-trauterine devices. Contraception. 2018; 97(1):2-13.
3. Cwiak C, Cordes S. Postpartum intrauterine device placement: a patient-friendly option. Con-tracept Reprod Med. 2018; 3:3.
4. Jatlaoui TC, Whiteman MK, Jeng G, Tepper NK, Berry-Bibee E, Jamieson DJ, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM. Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Re-view and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132(4):895-905.
5. Averbach S, Kully G, Hinz E, et al. Early vs Interval Postpartum Intrauterine Device Place-ment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;329(11):910–917.
6. Myo MG, Nguyen BT. Intrauterine device complications and their management. Current Ob-stetrics and Gynecology Reports. 2023 Jun;12(2):88-95.
7. Chawla D, Loukya A, Chugh C, Chadha S. A randomised study to compare Cu T 380A and Cu 375 as postpartum intrauterine contraceptive method.
8. Suhag P, Srivastava H, Arya J, Chandrakar R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy for cu375 and cu t 380 concerning failure rates as a postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device. International Journal of Medicine & Public Health. 2025;15(2).
9. Splinter K, O’Connor C, Lavoie D. Efficacy and Success of Immediate Postpartum IUD Inser-tion in a Northern Ontario Tertiary Care Center. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Cana-da. 2025 Apr 10:102838.
10. Garmi G, Seh-Shmali K, Zafran N, Erez O, Romano S, Salim R. Efficacy and safety of intrau-terine device placement during a planned cesarean section. Heliyon. 2022 Dec 1;8(12).