COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DENTAL FLOSS AND INTERDENTAL BRUSHES ON PLAQUE CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH REDUCED PERIODONTIUM: A CLINICAL EVALUATION USING PLAQUE INDEX
Main Article Content
Keywords
interdental brushes, dental floss, plaque index, reduced periodontium, oral hygiene, periodontal care
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of dental floss and interdental brushes in reducing plaque index among patients with reduced periodontium.
Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Periodontology, Sardar Begum Dental College, Peshawar, from September 2024 to Oct 2024. Sixty-seven patients with reduced periodontium were randomly allocated into two groups: floss (n = 33) and interdental brush (n = 34). Baseline plaque index was recorded using the Silness and Löe Plaque Index. Participants were instructed to use their allocated interdental aid once daily in addition to tooth brushing for one month. Plaque index was reassessed at follow-up. Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: Both groups demonstrated improvement, but the mean plaque index reduction was greater in the interdental brush group (0.75 ± 0.14) compared with the floss group (0.38 ± 0.12). The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Moreover, a higher proportion of interdental brush users achieved a clinically meaningful reduction (73.5% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Interdental brushes were significantly more effective than dental floss in reducing plaque accumulation in patients with reduced periodontium. They should be recommended as the preferred interdental cleaning aid in such cases.
References
2. Silva C, Albuquerque P, de Assis P, Lopes C, Anníbal H, Lago MCA, et al. Does flossing before or after brushing influence the reduction in the plaque index? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. 2022;20(1):18-25.
3. Gennai S, Nisi M, Perić M, Marhl U, Izzetti R, Tonelli M, et al. Interdental plaque reduction after the use of different devices in patients with periodontitis and interdental recession: A randomized clinical trial. 2022;20(2):308-17.
4. Marçal FF, Mota de Paulo JP, Barreto LG, de Carvalho Guerra LM, Silva PGdBJIJoDH. Effectiveness of orthodontic toothbrush versus conventional toothbrush on plaque and gingival index reduction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. 2022;20(1):87-99.
5. Bosma ML, McGuire JA, Sunkara A, Sullivan P, Yoder A, Milleman J, et al. Efficacy of Flossing and Mouthrinsing Regimens on Plaque and Gingivitis: A randomized clinical trial. 2022;96(3):8-20.
6. Langa GPJ, Muniz FWMG, Wagner TP, e Silva CF, Rösing CKJJoEBDP. Anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis efficacy of different bristle stiffness and end-shape toothbrushes on interproximal surfaces: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 2021;21(2):101548.
7. Londero AB, Reiniger APP, Tavares RC, Ferreira CM, Wikesjö UM, Kantorski KZ, et al. Efficacy of dental floss in the management of gingival health: a randomized controlled clinical trial. 2022;26(8):5273-80.
8. Roa Lopez A, Moreu Burgos G, Aguilar Salvatierra A, Fernández Delgado J, Bravo M, Gonzalez Jaranay MJIJoDH. Efficacy of dental floss with ellipsoidal knots vs conventional dental floss for plaque removal: A split‐mouth randomized trial. 2021;19(2):209-14.
9. Slot DE, Valkenburg C, Van der Weijden GJJoCP. Mechanical plaque removal of periodontal maintenance patients: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis. 2020;47:107-24.
10. Pal M, Kumar S, Shenoy PA, Chaitanya T, Pratibha G, Bhat GSJOAMJoMS. Evaluation of plaque removal efficacy of dental floss with/without chlorhexidine gel coating in patients with gingivitis-a clinical and microbological study. 2020;8(D):118-23.
11. Kim Y-RJIJoPH. Comparison of Oral Health Status, Dental Treatment Items, Periodontal Disease between Use of Dental Floss and Interdental Toothbrush using the 6th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2022;51(8):1904.
12. Deepika V, Chandrasekhar R, Uloopi K, Ratnaditya A, Vinay C, RojaRamya KSJIjocpd. A randomized controlled trial for evaluation of the effectiveness of oral irrigator and interdental floss for plaque control in children with visual impairment. 2022;15(4):389.
13. Aeran H, Tuli AS, Bartwal J, Vishnoi L, Aeran VJIJOHD. Comparison of efficacy of conventional toothbrush and single tuft brush for the control of dental plaque. 2020;5:203-7.
14. Langa GPJ, Dantas PPdA, Lemus GMR, Benitez Silva CG, Meza-Mauricio J, Muniz FWMGJCOI. Effectiveness of interdental cleaning devices with active substances: a systematic review. 2022;26(3):2253-67.
15. Sgarbanti C. A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF WATER FLOSSER TO INTERDENTAL FLOSS AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL AND A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PATIENTS'PERCEPTIONS. 2021.
16. Abdellatif H, Alnaeimi N, Alruwais H, Aldajan R, Hebbal MIJTSdj. Comparison between water flosser and regular floss in the efficacy of plaque removal in patients after single use. 2021;33(5):256-9.
17. Sawan N, Ben Gassem A, Alkhayyal F, Albakri A, Al-Muhareb N, Alsagob EJIJoD. Effectiveness of super floss and water flosser in plaque removal for patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. 2022;2022(1):1344258.
18. Langa GPJ, Muniz FWMG, Costa RdSA, da Silveira TM, Rösing CKJCOI. The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinse as adjunct to toothbrushing compared to placebo on interproximal plaque and gingival inflammation—a systematic review with meta-analyses. 2021;25(2):745-57.
19. Subramanya AP, Prabhuji MJIJoDH. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and patient‐reported outcome measures of oral hygiene instruction methods for calibrated interdental brush. 2021;19(3):287-94.
20. Rajwani AR, Hawes SND, To A, Quaranta A, Aguilar JCRJOh, dentistry p. Effectiveness of manual toothbrushing techniques on plaque and gingivitis: a systematic review. 2020;18(4):a45354.