PREVALENCE AND ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA ISOLATED FROM WOUND INFECTIONS: A HOSPITAL-BASED STUDY AT PJMCH, DUMKA, JHARKHAND

Main Article Content

Dr. Ramjanam Prasad
Dr. Vikas Oraon
Dr. Pinki Kumari
Dr. Jiwesh Kumar Thakur
Dr. Satyendra Prasad Yadav

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Antibiotic susceptibility

Abstract

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common opportunistic pathogen frequently associated with hospital-acquired infections, particularly wound and pus infections. Its increasing resistance to multiple antibiotics poses a significant therapeutic challenge. This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of P. aeruginosa isolated from pus samples in a tertiary care hospital.


Methods: A total of 376 pus samples were processed in the Department of Microbiology, PJMCH, Dumka, Jharkhand, from January to December 2023. Isolates were identified using standard microbiological methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion according to CLSI guidelines.


Results: Out of 376 samples, 37 (9.84%) yielded P. aeruginosa. The highest prevalence was noted in the 40–49 years age group (37.84%) with male predominance (67.57%). Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed highest sensitivity to piperacillin/tazobactam (78.38%), imipenem (78.38%), aztreonam (78.38%), and meropenem (75.68%), while resistance was most frequent against ofloxacin (48.65%) and ciprofloxacin (37.84%). The overall prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates was 21.62%.


Conclusion: P. aeruginosa remains an important cause of wound infections with considerable antimicrobial resistance. Continuous surveillance of antibiograms and judicious use of antimicrobials are essential to guide empirical therapy and prevent the emergence of MDR strains.

Abstract 146 | PDF Downloads 19

References

1. De bentzmann, plesiat The Pseudomonas aeruginosa opportunistic pathogem and human infections. Evnvirm microbial. 2011, 13:1655-65.
2. Olofsson SK, Cars O. Optimizing drug exposure to minimise selection of antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45(suppl 2):S129-S136.
3. Xu J, Duan X, Wu H, Zhou Q.Surveillance and correlation of antimicrobial usage and resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A hospital population based study. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(11):e78604. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078604.
4. Koineman WK, Allen SD, Janda WM, Scherackenberger PC, Propcop GW, WoodsM GL, et. al. Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 6th ed. Lippincott=Reven Publisher. 2005;654.662.
5. Iredell. J. Brown, and K. Tagg. "Antibiotic resistance in Enter-abacteriaceae:mechanisms and clinical implications," British Medical Journal, vol. 352, Articel ID h6420, 2016
6. E. Cerceo, S. B. Deitelzweing, B.M. Shermian, and A.N. Amin, "Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospital setting overview, implications for clinical practice, and emerging treatment options," Microbial Drug Resistance. vol. 22, no. 5, pp 412-413, 2016
7. Spellberg. B. Guidos, R, Gilbert D, Breadly J. Boucher HW, Scheld WM, Bartlett JG, Edwards, J Jr; Infectious Diseases Society of America. The epidemic of antibioltice-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008, 46(2):155-164.
8. Khan JA, Iqbal Z, RahmanSU,FarzanaK,KhanA.Prevalence and resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosaagainst various antibiotics. Pak JPharm Sci.2008;21(3):311-5.
9. Savas L, Duran N, Savas N, Onlen Y, OCAK S. The prevalence and resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units in a university hospital. Turkish J Med Sci. 2005;35(5):317-22.
10. Jarvis WR.Preventing the emergence of multidrug resistant microorganism through antimicrobial use controls: The complexity of the problem.Infec control HospEpidemiol. 1996;17:490-5.
11. Ghosh A, Karmakar PS, Pal J, Chakraborty N, Debnath NB, Mukherjee JD. Bacterial incidence and antibiotic sensitivitypattern in moderate and severe infections in hospitalized patients. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009:107(1):21-5
12. Zubair M, Malik A, Ahmad J. Clinic microbiologicalstudy and antimicrobial drug resistance profile of diabetic footinfections in NorthIndia. 2011;21(1):6-14.
13. Sharma VG, Sharma PV,SharmaH.A study of various isolates from pus sample with their antibiogram fromJln hospital, Ajmer. J Dental Med Sci.2015;14(10):64-8.
14. Al-Ibran E, Meraj S, Nasim M, Khan M, Rao MH. Pattern of microorganisms isolated from flame burn wounds, and their trends of susceptibility to antibiotic during past three years. J Dow Uni Health Sci. 2013;7(2):49-53
15. Dou Y, Huan J, Guo F, Zhou Z, Shi Y. Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence, antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial use in Chinese burn wards from 2007 to 2014. J Int Med Res. 2017; 45:1124-1137.
16. Hancock RE. Resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27(1):S93–S99. doi: 10.1086/514909