THE BLEEDING TRUTH: A TISSUE-LEVEL STUDY OF UTEROCERVICAL PATHOLOGIES IN WOMEN ACROSS DEMOGRAPHICS

Main Article Content

Dr. Dibyendu Patra
Dr. Papiya Majumdar
Dr. Sujata Mallick
Dr. Ranu Sarkar

Keywords

AUB, socio economicstatus, endometrium, cervix, Kuppuswamy scale

Abstract

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB) represents a complex and widespread gynecological concern that spans all reproductive age groups. Characterized by deviations in the volume, duration, or frequency of menstrual bleeding, AUB not only disrupts physiological rhythms but also impairs social, emotional, and occupational well-being. Accounting for approximately 30% of gynecological outpatient consultations, it remains one of the leading clinical presentations prompting medical evaluation and is frequently associated with the need for surgical management.


 


The 2011 FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) has brought much-needed clarity to the diagnosis and categorization of AUB, distinguishing between structural (PALM) and non-structural (COEIN) causes. Structural causes include polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and malignancies, while hormonal imbalances, coagulopathies, and iatrogenic factors make up the non-structural group.


AUB in perimenopausal women often signals underlying pathologies like fibroids, hyperplasia, or even malignancy. Histopathological evaluation—particularly endometrial biopsy—remains a cornerstone in diagnosing these conditions, guiding appropriate and timely management.


This study explores the histological spectrum of uterocervical lesions in women with AUB and examines the influence of sociodemographic factors on these presentations.


 


Materials and Methods:


This cross-sectional observational study was conducted over eighteen months in the Pathology Department of a Kolkata medical college, evaluating ninety-three symptomatic individuals with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Following ethical approval, data on demographics, clinical history, and investigations were collected. The study included women over 18 with AUB, while excluding those with ovarian, endocrine issues, or coagulopathies. Socioeconomic status was assessed using the Kuppuswamy scale, which considers education, occupation, and income to classify individuals into socioeconomic classes.


 


Result & Conclusion:


This study examined endometrial and cervical pathologies linked to abnormal uterine and cervical bleeding. Key findings show that most participants were in the 35-40years age group with a varied socioeconomic status varied. Most had unremarkable findings. Endometrial thickness was mostly between 5-10 mm, and with fibroids as common findings.


Histopathology showed simple hyperplastic endometrium as the commonest findings in the endometrial biopsy.

Abstract 152 | Pdf Downloads 20

References

1. Ayers DMM, Lappin JES, Liptok LM. Abnormal vs. dysfunctional uterine bleeding: What’s the difference? Nursing 2004;34:11-4.
2. Mulay PS, Rama S, Deshpande SA. Histopathological spectrum of endometrium in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women in a tertiary care center. J Med Sci Clin Res 2019;07:116-23
3. Sun Y, Wang Y, Mao L, Wen J, Bai W. Prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding according to new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification in Chinese women of reproductive age: A cross- sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(31):e11457.
4. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS. The flexible FIGO classification concept for underlying causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:391-9.
5. Albers JR, Hull SK, Wesley RM. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(8):1915-26.
6. Nicholson WK, Ellison SA, Grason H, Powe NR. Patterns of ambulatory care use for gynaecologic conditions: a national study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:523-30.
7. Whitaker L. Abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;34:54-65.
8. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100-7.
9. Brahma PK, Martel KM, Christman GM. Future directions in myoma research. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006;33:199-224.
10. Indrani M, Rao PS, Nataraj S, Biswas M. An analysis of endometrial bleeding patterns in perimenopausal women. IJRCOG. 2017;6(7):415-9.
11. Agarwal P, Garg R, Rai N, Prakash P. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J South Asian Feder Menopause Soc. 2016;4(1):22-6.
12. Talukdar B, Mahela S. Abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopausal women: Correlation with sonographic findings and histopathological examination of hysterectomy specimens. J Midlife Health. 2016;7(2):73-77.
13. Jairajpuri ZJ, Rana S, Jetle S. Atypical uterine bleeding- Histopathological audit of endometrium A study of 638 cases. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2013;6(1): 21-8.
14. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 7 th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 187-234