SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ANAEMIA AMONG WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN THE INDIAN POPULATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Anemia, Sociodemographic factors, Adolescents, Prevalence and Rural residents
Abstract
Introduction: Anaemia remains a major public health challenge among Indian women of reproductive age (15–49 years), with over 50% affected according to NFHS-5. Iron deficiency, compounded by poor nutrition, infections, and sociodemographic disparities, is the primary cause. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate anaemia prevalence and identify key sociodemographic factors—such as age, education, income, residence, and marital status—associated with anaemia among Indian women.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of NFHS-5 data was conducted. Women with haemoglobin <12 g/dL were classified as anaemic. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression were applied to evaluate associations.
Results: Anaemia prevalence was highest among adolescents (59.8%), women with no formal education (68.2%), the poorest quintile (67.1%), and rural residents (59.2%). Significant predictors included low education (AOR 2.1), rural residence (AOR 1.6), low income (AOR 2.3), and younger age (AOR 1.7).
Conclusion: Anaemia is strongly influenced by sociodemographic inequities. Interventions targeting adolescent girls, rural populations, and economically disadvantaged groups—along with improved female education—are essential for reducing anaemia burden in India.
References
2. Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Ozaltin E, et al. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2123–2135.
3. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Anaemia Mukt Bharat Guidelines. 2018.
4. Vir S, Kalita A, Mondal S. Anaemia in pregnancy: a community-based study in rural India. Indian J Community Med. 2014;39(3):157–160.
5. Bentley ME, Griffiths PL. The burden of anaemia among women in India. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(1):52–60.
6. Aguayo VM, Paintal K, Singh G. The adolescent girls’ anaemia control programme. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(1):68–71.
7. IIPS. Regional disparities in nutritional status in India. NFHS State Reports, 2021.
8. Kassebaum NJ, et al. A systematic analysis of global anaemia burden. Lancet Haematol. 2014;1(1):e16–e25.
9. Khan JR, Awan N, Misu F. Determinants of anaemia among women in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1–8.
10. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–451.
11. Gupta A, Parashar A, Thakur A. Anaemia and its determinants among rural Indian women. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(5):1570–1574.
12. Rai RK, Fawzi WW, Barik A. Sociodemographic determinants of anaemia among women of reproductive age in India. J Biosoc Sci. 2020;52(5):675–686.
13. Lassi ZS, Moin A, Das JK. Nutrition in adolescent girls in South Asia. BMJ. 2021;372:n1.
14. Ghosh S. Exploring socioeconomic vulnerability of anaemia among Indian women. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(16):3028–3036.
15. Patra S, Pasrija R. Socioeconomic inequalities in anaemia among Indian women. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(5):541–552.
16. Horton S, Ross J. The economics of iron deficiency. Food Policy. 2003;28(1):51–75.
17. Nguyen PH, et al. Anaemia and nutrition in adolescent girls. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2017;13(1):e12438.
18. Pandey S, Lin Y. The impact of child marriage on anaemia among Indian women. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):142.
19. Government of India. WIFS Guidelines for adolescents. 2013.
20. UNICEF India. Tackling anaemia: Multi-sectoral strategy report. 2021.