SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ANAEMIA AMONG WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN THE INDIAN POPULATION

Main Article Content

Dr Shyamrao C More
Dr. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal
Dr Shirish B. Patil

Keywords

Anemia, Sociodemographic factors, Adolescents, Prevalence and Rural residents

Abstract

Introduction: Anaemia remains a major public health challenge among Indian women of reproductive age (15–49 years), with over 50% affected according to NFHS-5. Iron deficiency, compounded by poor nutrition, infections, and sociodemographic disparities, is the primary cause. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate anaemia prevalence and identify key sociodemographic factors—such as age, education, income, residence, and marital status—associated with anaemia among Indian women.


 Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of NFHS-5 data was conducted. Women with haemoglobin <12 g/dL were classified as anaemic. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression were applied to evaluate associations.


 Results: Anaemia prevalence was highest among adolescents (59.8%), women with no formal education (68.2%), the poorest quintile (67.1%), and rural residents (59.2%). Significant predictors included low education (AOR 2.1), rural residence (AOR 1.6), low income (AOR 2.3), and younger age (AOR 1.7).


Conclusion: Anaemia is strongly influenced by sociodemographic inequities. Interventions targeting adolescent girls, rural populations, and economically disadvantaged groups—along with improved female education—are essential for reducing anaemia burden in India.

Abstract 131 | Pdf Downloads 25

References

1. NFHS-5 Report, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2021.
2. Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Ozaltin E, et al. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2123–2135.
3. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Anaemia Mukt Bharat Guidelines. 2018.
4. Vir S, Kalita A, Mondal S. Anaemia in pregnancy: a community-based study in rural India. Indian J Community Med. 2014;39(3):157–160.
5. Bentley ME, Griffiths PL. The burden of anaemia among women in India. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(1):52–60.
6. Aguayo VM, Paintal K, Singh G. The adolescent girls’ anaemia control programme. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(1):68–71.
7. IIPS. Regional disparities in nutritional status in India. NFHS State Reports, 2021.
8. Kassebaum NJ, et al. A systematic analysis of global anaemia burden. Lancet Haematol. 2014;1(1):e16–e25.
9. Khan JR, Awan N, Misu F. Determinants of anaemia among women in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1–8.
10. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–451.
11. Gupta A, Parashar A, Thakur A. Anaemia and its determinants among rural Indian women. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(5):1570–1574.
12. Rai RK, Fawzi WW, Barik A. Sociodemographic determinants of anaemia among women of reproductive age in India. J Biosoc Sci. 2020;52(5):675–686.
13. Lassi ZS, Moin A, Das JK. Nutrition in adolescent girls in South Asia. BMJ. 2021;372:n1.
14. Ghosh S. Exploring socioeconomic vulnerability of anaemia among Indian women. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(16):3028–3036.
15. Patra S, Pasrija R. Socioeconomic inequalities in anaemia among Indian women. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(5):541–552.
16. Horton S, Ross J. The economics of iron deficiency. Food Policy. 2003;28(1):51–75.
17. Nguyen PH, et al. Anaemia and nutrition in adolescent girls. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2017;13(1):e12438.
18. Pandey S, Lin Y. The impact of child marriage on anaemia among Indian women. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):142.
19. Government of India. WIFS Guidelines for adolescents. 2013.
20. UNICEF India. Tackling anaemia: Multi-sectoral strategy report. 2021.