IMPACT OF DIGITAL HEALTH INTERVENTIONS ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS: A SCOPING REVIEW FOCUSED ON INDIAN POPULATIONS

Main Article Content

Yuthika Rao
Prof. (Dr.) Manisha Saharan
Dr. Puneet Rhijwani
Prof. (Dr.) Shailendra Mehta

Keywords

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Digital Health; Quality of Life; India; mHealth; Scoping Review

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) adversely affects quality of life (QoL), particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as India. Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly adopted for diabetes self-management, yet their specific impact on QoL outcomes in Indian populations remains underexplored. [3] [12]


Objective:

To systematically map and synthesize existing literature on the impact of DHIs on QoL among Indian adults living with T2DM.


Methods:

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IndMED databases from January 2010 to October 2023. Eligible studies evaluated DHIs—including mobile applications, SMS- based interventions, or telemedicine platforms—and reported QoL outcomes using validated instruments. Data on study design, type of intervention, QoL domains assessed, and outcomes were charted and analyzed narratively.


Results:

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials (n=6), quasi- experimental studies (n=3), and pre-post or observational designs (n=3). Interventions included mobile apps, SMS reminders, and teleconsultation-based systems. The most commonly used QoL assessment tools were WHOQOL-BREF, SF-36, and EQ-5D. Ten studies reported statistically significant improvements in at least one QoL domain, with the most consistent benefits observed in physical (9/12 studies) and psychological (8/12) domains. Fewer studies addressed social or environmental QoL. Most interventions were short-term (≤6 months) and conducted in urban settings. [4] [5] [6]


 
Conclusion:

DHIs show considerable promise in improving QoL among Indian adults with T2DM, particularly in physical and mental health domains. However, current evidence is limited by short follow-up periods and a lack of focus on rural populations and social determinants. Future research should emphasize long-term outcomes and inclusive, accessible digital design.

Abstract 54 | PDF Downloads 17

References

1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: 2021.
2. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999;15(3):205–18.
3. Marcolino MS, Oliveira JAQ, D’Agostino M, et al. The impact of mHealth interventions: Systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(1):e23.
4. WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8.
5. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
6. EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.
7. Hou C, Xu Q, Li X, et al. Mobile phone applications and self-management of diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(9):706–14.
8. Nelson LA, Mulvaney SA, Gebretsadik T, et al. Disparities in effectiveness of mHealth interventions for diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(9):2713–21.
9. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission. Government of India; 2021. https://abdm.gov.in
10. Mehra S, Viswanathan V, Bajaj S. mHealth solutions for underserved diabetes populations in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2023;27(2):121–6.
11. World Health Organization. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
12. Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):160–71