COMPARISON OF ORAL IVABRADINE AND INTRAVENOUS LIGNOCAINE IN ATTENUATION OF HAEMODYNAMIC STRESS RESPONSE TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND INTUBATION: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr Dheeraj.R.Patel
Dr Smitha Y
Dr Vijaykumar C S

Keywords

....

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation elicit a sympathetic surge, causing abrupt elevations in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP).


Pharmacologic attenuation of this response is essential to prevent perioperative complications.


Aim: To compare the efficacy of oral ivabradine and intravenous lignocaine in attenuating haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in adult surgical patients.


Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 50 ASA I/II patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Group I received oral ivabradine 5 mg one hour before induction; Group L received IV lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg 90 seconds before laryngoscopy. HR, systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at baseline, post-induction, and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes post-intubation.


Results: Ivabradine significantly attenuated the rise in HR and MAP post-intubation compared to lignocaine (p < 0.05). Though SBP and DBP changes were also better controlled with ivabradine, statistical significance was not consistent across all time points.


Conclusion: Oral ivabradine is more effective than IV lignocaine in attenuating the haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, with minimal side effects and better HR control.

Abstract 74 | Pdf Downloads 30

References

1. Bhatnagar S, Saxena KN, Bansal P, Arora S. Comparison of Oral Ivabradine and Intravenous Lignocaine for Attenuation of Haemodynamic Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches. 2020;14(2):317– 322. doi:10.4103/aer.AER_81_20.
2. Singh RB, Kaur S, Gupta S. A Prospective Study Comparing the Effects of Ivabradine and Lignocaine on Attenuation of Pressor Response During Laryngoscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(4):289–294. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_14_19.

3. Manjunath A, Kannan S, Rao P, Sharma V. Ivabradine as a Novel Agent for Perioperative Heart Rate Control: A Comparative Study. J Clin Anaesth. 2021;35(3):199–204. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109876.
4. Lee A, Fan LT. Perioperative Use of Ivabradine in Non-cardiac Surgery: A Review of the Evidence. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017;45(3):392–401. doi:10.1177/0310057X1704500314.