TIMING OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT AMONG IMMEDIATE VS DELAYED APPROACHES IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Main Article Content

Vikas Punia
Jai Poonam Bhati
Anand Porwal
Palak Salgia
Abhijit Sethia
Saransh Malot

Keywords

Immediate implant, Delayed implant, Esthetic zone, PES, Marginal bone loss

Abstract

Background and Objective: Restoring anterior teeth with implants in the esthetic zone requires a balance between functional integration and esthetic excellence. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared immediate and delayed implant placement protocols with respect to implant survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), and Pink Esthetic Score (PES).


Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to June 2025. Eligible studies compared immediate and delayed implant placements in the esthetic zone and reported outcomes for survival, MBL, or PES. Data from seven studies were included and analysed using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa tools.


Results: Seven studies involving 358 implants (179 immediate, 179 delayed) met the inclusion criteria. Implant survival showed no significant difference (Risk Difference [RD] = 0.00; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.04; p = 0.99). MBL analysis showed high heterogeneity and no statistical significance (Mean Difference [MD] = -0.05 mm; p = 0.65; I² = 97%). Immediate implant placement was associated with significantly higher esthetic outcomes based on PES (MD = +0.65; 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.24; p = 0.03).


Conclusion: Immediate and delayed implant placements have comparable survival rates. However, immediate placement may provide superior esthetic outcomes when appropriate patient selection and surgical technique are ensured. High variability in MBL outcomes underscores the need for standardized protocols in future research. 

Abstract 162 | PDF Downloads 8

References

1. Felice P, Pistilli R, Barausse C, Ippolito DR, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Immediate non-occlusal loading of post-extractive implants in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015;8(4):361–72.
2. Slagter KW, Meijer HJA, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Immediate placement of implants in the esthetic zone: a 2-year randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(1):82–90.
3. Rehberger D, Zeller L, Happe A. Esthetic outcomes of immediate versus delayed implant placement: a prospective clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025;40(2):122–9.
4. Donker JP, Geraets W, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA. Comparison of pink esthetic score in immediate and delayed implant placement: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024;35(3):234–42.
5. Parvini P, Galarraga-Vinueza ME, Sader R, Becker J, Schwarz F. Aesthetic outcome of implants with immediate vs delayed placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(5):3621–34.
6. El-Ebiary H, El-Anwar MI, Faramawy AG, Shabaan MM. Comparison of esthetic outcomes in immediate vs delayed implants using PES/WES scores. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):124–30.
7. Cosyn J, De Rouck T, Collys K. Immediate and conventional single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year comparative study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(9):784–90.
8. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43–61.
9. Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MCM. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 5:39–66.
10. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC, Clement JG, Hammerle CH. Ridge preservation with and without primary wound closure: a comparative study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186–215.
11. Slagter KW, Meijer HJA, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM. Immediate single-tooth implant placement in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(9):1396–404.
12. Slagter KW, Stavropoulos A, den Hartog L, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM. Influence of timing of implant placement and provisionalization on soft tissue esthetics: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2021;92(4):516–25.
13. Panoramic Study Group. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement in daily practice: a multicenter observational study. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):23.
14. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(1):31–9.
15. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):73–80.
16. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(5):897–904.
17. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140–51.
18. Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(6):639–44.
19. Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS, Pjetursson B, Polido W, Weber HP. Group 2 ITI consensus report: prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 16:215–23.
20. Chen ST, Wilson TG, Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biological basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12–25.
21. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Collys K, Cleymaet R. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and esthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(8):746–53.
22. Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Implant survival rates and bone remodeling around implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):612–21.
23. El Chaar ES, Oshman S, Fallah Abed S, Kablan F, Hallmon W. The use of the socket-shield technique in immediate implant placement: a retrospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(6):865–71.
24. Schropp L, Isidor F. Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(5):481–7.
25. Dierens M, De Bruyn H, Raes F, Vandeweghe S, Cosyn J. Long-term clinical outcome of immediate single tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(9):784–90.
26. Raes F, De Bruyn H, De Clercq C, Jacobs R, Devriendt W. Esthetic evaluation and patient-centered outcome assessment of immediately placed implants in the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(9):995–1000.
27. Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Preservation of buccal plate and soft tissue following immediate implant placement: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(11):1154–60.
28. Noelken R, Kunkel M, Jung BA, Wagner W. Immediate and flapless implant placement with or without socket-shield: clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(6):1210–20.
29. Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes and factors influencing esthetic results of anterior maxillary single-tooth implants: results from the ITI Consensus Conference. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(Suppl):221–30.
30. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Comparative analysis of immediate functional loading and immediate non-functional loading of dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(1):24–36.