COMPARISON OF TRANSVAGINAL CERVICAL LENGTH AND MODIFIED BISHOP SCORE IN PREDICTING INDUCTION TO DELIVERY INTERVAL OF ≤ 24 HRS IN PRIMIGRAVIDAS ADMITTED FOR SAFE CONFINEMENT IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN SOUTH INDIA.

Main Article Content

Nivedita Sivadas Valliyil
Geetha Madhavanpillai Indira
Geethanjali Syamala Mohan
Mayadevi Brahmanandan

Keywords

.

Abstract

Induction of labour is a common intervention in modern obstetric practice, performed when the benefits of expediting delivery outweigh the risks of continuing pregnancy. Predicting the likelihood of successful induction is crucial for optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes, minimizing unnecessary interventions, and improving resource utilization.

Abstract 55 | Pdf Downloads 43

References

1. O'Leary JA, Ferrell RE. Comparison of ultrasonographic and digital cervical evaluation. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:718–9
2. Grimes-Dennis J, Berghella V. Cervical length and prediction of preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 ;19(2):191–5.
3. . Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, et al. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):623-8.
4. Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 7: 183–7
5. Ware V, Raynor D. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1030–2
6. Yanik A, Gulumser C, Tosun M. Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Adv Ther.2007;24(4):748-56
7. Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. Transvaginal ultrasound and digital Examination in predicting successful labor induction. American College of Obstet Gynaecol, 2001;98(1):2-6.