TARGETED MOTOR RELEARNING STRATEGIES FOR DOMINANT UPPER LIMB REHABILITATION FOLLOWING MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY STROKE: A CASE SERIES.
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
A short-term study on the Efficacy of the Motor Relearning Program (MRP) for Upper-Limb Function Improvement in the Affected Dominant Hand of MCA Stroke Patients: A Case Series Study.
Background: Middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke often results in hemiparesis or hemiplegia, which impairs the dominant hand's function. Stroke rehabilitation strategies, particularly the Motor Relearning Program (MRP), have gained prominence in improving motor functions. This case series explores the application of MRP for upper-limb function recovery in MCA stroke patients. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the MRP in improving upper-limb motor function in MCA stroke patients, focusing on the recovery of the affected dominant hand.
Methods: Five MCA stroke patients with dominant hand impairment participated in this case series. MRP-based rehabilitation interventions were provided over 12 weeks. The outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and patient-reported outcomes on Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Results: All patients demonstrated significant improvements in upper-limb function, particularly in motor control and task-oriented activities. There was notable progress in the FMA and ARAT scores, indicating enhanced motor recovery and functionality.
Conclusion: The Motor Relearning Program effectively facilitated functional recovery of the affected dominant hand in MCA stroke patients, showing promise as a targeted rehabilitation intervention for post-stroke motor impairments.
References
2. Ada, L., & Mackey, F. (2003). Evaluation of the Motor Relearning Programme: A controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(6), 549-557. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr651oa
3. Arya, K. N., Pandian, S., Verma, R., & Garg, R. K. (2011). Movement therapy induced neural reorganization and motor recovery in stroke: A review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 15(4), 528-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.01.023
4. Basso, D. M., & Lang, C. E. (2013). Considerations for research on motor recovery and treatment after stroke. Stroke, 44(5), 1787-1791. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000046
5. Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67(2), 206-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.2.206
6. Carr, J. H., & Shepherd, R. B. (1987). A Motor Relearning Programme for stroke. Physiotherapy, 73(7), 372-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(10)61586-9
7. Daly, J. J., & Ruff, R. L. (2007). Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. *Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 31*(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e318032157f
8. Duncan, P. W., Goldstein, L. B., Matchar, D., Divine, G. W., &Feussner, J. (1992). Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke, 23(8), 1084-1089. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.23.8.1084
9. French, B., Thomas, L. H., Leathley, M. J., Sutton, C. J., McAdam, J., Forster, A., ... & Watkins, C. L. (2016). Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(11), CD006073. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ 14651858.CD006073.pub3
10. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., &Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), 13-31.
11. Holden, M. K., Gill, K. M., & Nathan, J. (1984). Functional outcome after stroke: Rehabilitation aspects. Stroke, 15(2), 190-194. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.15.2.190
12. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., & Lindeman, E. (2004). Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 22(3-5), 281-299.
13. Langhorne, P., Coupar, F., & Pollock, A. (2009). Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. The Lancet Neurology, 8(8), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4
14. Levin, M. F., Kleim, J. A., & Wolf, S. L. (2009). What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23*(4), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308328727
15. Linder, S. M., Rosenfeldt, A. B., Bay, R. C., Sahu, K., Wolf, S. L., & Alberts, J. L. (2015). Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 6902290020p1-6902290020p10. https://doi.org/10.5014/ ajot.2015.014498
16. Lohse, K. R., Lang, C. E., & Boyd, L. A. (2014). Is better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 45(7), 2053-2058. https://doi.org/10.1161/ STROKEAHA.114.004695
17. Michaelsen, S. M., Dannenbaum, R., & Levin, M. F. (2006). Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: Randomized control trial. *Stroke, 37(1), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000195179.48332.c3
18. Page, S. J., Gater, D. R., & Bach-Y-Rita, P. (2004). Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(8), 1377-1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.031
19. Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. (2007). Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
20. Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., ... & Nichols-Larsen, D. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 296(17), 2095-2104. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.