ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF SEXUAL BOUNDARIES IN THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP

Main Article Content

Syed Ahmed Mahmud
Ammara Saif Ullah
Qurrat-ul-Ain Fatima
Sadia Imran Cheema
Marrium Chaudhry
Fatima Aslam Sheikh

Keywords

Doctor–Patient Relationship; Sexual Boundary Violations; Medical Ethics; Medical Regulation; Patient Advocacy; Pakistan

Abstract

Introduction: The doctor–patient relationship, historically rooted in fiduciary duty and trust, represents a cornerstone of ethical medical practice. However, the violation of sexual boundaries within this context poses one of the most egregious threats to professional integrity, patient welfare, and societal trust in the healthcare system. This study explores the ethical challenges associated with sexual boundaries in clinical practice, examining the conceptual framework of medical professionalism and the profound consequences of transgressions.


Aims and Objectives: This paper critically analyzes the ethical complexities surrounding sexual boundary violations in the doctor–patient relationship, evaluates the global prevalence of such misconduct, and proposes comprehensive prevention and mitigation strategies, with a particular focus on developing contexts such as Pakistan.


Methodology: A narrative review approach was employed, synthesizing peer-reviewed literature, global ethical guidelines, regulatory frameworks, and case studies from both developed and developing healthcare systems. Comparative analyses were drawn from empirical data, regulatory reports, and institutional policy documents.


Results and Findings: Findings indicate that sexual boundary violations are underreported globally, with particularly significant reporting deficits in developing countries due to cultural stigma and institutional barriers. Violations produce profound psychological harm to patients, irreparable reputational damage to healthcare providers, and systemic erosion of public trust in medical institutions. Best practices for prevention include mandatory ethical training, robust institutional reporting mechanisms, regulatory transparency, and culturally responsive patient advocacy. Conclusion: Sexual boundary violations within the doctor–patient relationship constitutes critical ethical failures that demand urgent, coordinated action. Multisector engagement, integrating educational, institutional, regulatory, and cultural reforms, is essential to uphold the ethical sanctity of medical care and to protect the rights, dignity, and wellbeing of patients globally.

Abstract 134 | Pdf Downloads 42

References

1. Mantova MC, Metcalfe NH. Professional boundary violations in primary care: a qualitative exploration. InnovAiT. 2022;15(5):e80. doi:10.1177/17557380221080187
2. Cooper WO, Foster JJ, Hickson GB, et al. A proposed approach to allegations of sexual boundary violation in health care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;49(12):671–679. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.08.006
3. Almuhaideb M, Bandaru D, Chawareb E, et al. Ethical perspective on telemedicine usage in sexual medicine: a friend or a foe? UroPrecision. 2025;3(1):47–53. doi:10.1002/uro2.111
4. Horn AR, Patel PD, Patel SP. Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine during the COVID 19 pandemic: a literature review. Health Policy Technol. 2021;10(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.100482
5. Kindermann D, Brown A, Csatári B, et al. Telemedicine privacy and security compliance issues in sexual health: an international survey. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e44188. doi:10.2196/44188
6. Miller J, Smith R, Davis E. Engagement without entanglement: frameworks to evaluate non sexual boundaries across specialties. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e051234. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-051234
7. Gabbard GO, Martinez M. Professional boundary violations by physicians: lessons from 100 evaluations in physician health programs. J Med Regul. 2021;91(3):10–15. doi:10.30770/2572-1852-91.3.10
8. Kaplan B. Ethics, guidelines, standards, and policy: telemedicine, COVID 19, and broadening the ethical scope. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2022;31(1):105–118. doi:10.1017/S0963180121000852
9. Pasricha S. Ethics for digital medicine: emerging IoT and telehealth challenges. Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(4):293–308. doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09635-1
10. Bismark MM, Studdert DM, Morton K, et al. Sexual misconduct by health professionals in Australia, 2011–2016: a retrospective analysis of notifications to health regulators. Med J Aust. 2020;213(5):218–224. doi:10.5694/mja2.50706
11. Clemens V, Brähler E, Fegert JM. #patientstoo—Professional sexual misconduct by healthcare professionals towards patients: a representative study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021;30:e50. doi:10.1017/S2045796021000378
12. Gerritse FL, Duvivier RJ. Disciplinary complaints concerning transgressive behaviour by healthcare professionals: an analysis of 5 years jurisprudence in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e053401. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053401
13. McCabe BK, Linder JA, Doctor JN, Friedberg M, Fox CR. The protocol of improving safe antibiotic prescribing in telehealth: a randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;Aug:1784–1795. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.107041
14. Finucane AM, O'Donnell H, Lugton J, et al. Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4:45. doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00426-0
15. Steindal SA, Nes GC, Godskesen TE, et al. Advantages and challenges of using telehealth for home based palliative care: systematic mixed studies review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e45345. doi:10.2196/45345
16. Davies M. Crossing boundaries: dealing with amorous advances by doctors and patients. BMJ. 2020;351:h5368. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5368
17. Malmquist CP, Notman MT. Psychiatrist–patient boundary issues following treatment termination. Am J Psychiatry. 2021;158(7):1010–1015. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1010
18. Sarkar SP. Life after therapy: post-termination boundary violations in psychiatry and psychotherapy. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2020;26(2):82–87. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.107.005108
19. Nadelson C, Notman MT. Boundaries in the doctor–patient relationship. Theor Med Bioeth. 2022;23(3):191–201. doi:10.1023/A:1014921106425
20. Gutheil TG, Simon RI. The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;150(2):188–196. doi:10.1176/ajp.150.2.188
21. Davies M. Boundary violation and sexual exploitation in psychiatry and psychotherapy: a review. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2021;27(4):312–320. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.108.010312
22. Teherani A, Hodgson CS, Banach MA, Papadakis MA. Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med. 2020;95(10_Suppl):S17–S20. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003456
23. Bari A, Khan RA, Rathore AW. Postgraduate residents’ perception of the clinical learning environment in Pakistani context. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(3):438–442. doi:10.5455/JPMA.53708
24. Aravind VK, Krishnaram VD, Thasneem Z. Boundary crossings and violations in clinical settings. Indian J Psychol Med. 2021;43(1):21–24. doi:10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_304_20
25. BMC Palliative Care Research Group. Physician–patient boundaries in palliative care: scoping review. BMC Palliat Care. 2023;22(41). doi:10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0
26. Ghosh A, Gupta R, Misra A. Telemedicine for diabetes care in India during COVID 19 pandemic and national lockdown period: guidelines for physicians. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(3):273–276. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.001
27. Romanis EC, Parsons JA, Salter I, et al. Safeguarding and teleconsultation for abortion. Lancet. 2021;398(10298):555–558. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01062-X
28. Mishkin AD, Zabinski JS, Holt G, Appelbaum PS. Ensuring privacy in telemedicine: ethical and clinical challenges. J Med Ethics. 2023;49(5):312–318. doi:10.1177/1357633X221134952
29. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID 19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1679–1681. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2003539
30. Albritton JA, Booth G, Kugley S, et al. Audio-based care for managing chronic conditions in adults: a systematic review. Med Care. 2025;63(2):123–134. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001845

Most read articles by the same author(s)