IMPACT OF TWO DIFFERENT TOOTH-COLOURED RESTORATIVE MATERIALS ON THE ORAL HEALTH PROFILE OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING FULL MOUTH

Main Article Content

Dr Mahrukh Syed
Dr Javaria Imtiaz
Dr. Abdul Ahad Khurshid
Dr Fahad Ashfaq
Dr. Hamna Tariq
Dr. Wajeeha Jabeen

Keywords

OHIP, Full mouth reintegration, vertical dimension of the occlusion, Oral health-related quality of life.

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe tooth wear can now benefit from minimally invasive treatment options thanks to fundamental advancements in adhesive technology and material science. The lifespan of the restorations and the maintenance of the original tooth material are crucial in this situation. When associated to conventional restorations with retentive formulation, minimally invasive treatments are recommended for many patients since they result in about 45% reduced tooth material loss.


Objectives: To compare several restorative items (ceramic and experimental CAD/CAM composite) & examine this issue in patients undergoing full-mouth reintegration.


Methodology: The OHIP-20 questionnaire was given to 50 patients (25 men and 25 women) who needed full mouth rehabilitation because of varying levels of tooth wear. They were to complete it both previously (baseline) & thirty days following prosthetic management with ceramic or experimental CAD/CAM composite restorations. The questions were broken down in 5 categories: orofacial discomfort, language restrictions, psychosocial effect, appearance, and oral functions. Differences between the two OHIP surveys for each question and patient were examined independently based on difference values.


Results: There were notable variations (p < 0.001) among the five dimensions. The most beneficial findings were seen in the appearance dimension (p < 0.001). The factor with the lowest positive scores (p < 0.001) was language restrictions. Oral functioning, psychosocial effect, and orofacial discomfort were the other three characteristics that did not differ substantially (p < 0.007)


Conclusion: The outcomes of this study highlight the important developments in restorative dentistry, especially in minimally invasive methods for treating extreme tooth deterioration. In addition to maintaining natural tooth structure, these therapies enhance oral health-related quality of life (QoL) in areas including appearance, oral function, and psychological effect by utilizing contemporary materials like ceramics and experimental CAD/CAM composites


 

Abstract 69 | pdf Downloads 40

References

1. Sabbagh S, Movahhed T, Bagheri H, Sadeghi M, Shahid S, Mohammadi H. Color change of tooth-colored restorative materials bonded to silver diamine fluoride-treated dentine: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):737.
2. Su NY, Wang YH, Chang YC. A registry-based study of tooth-colored restorative materials for decayed teeth in Taiwan. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2023 Jul 1;18(3):1235-42.
3. Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Thongsroi T, Saesaw P, Pongpaiboon N, Saewong S. In vitro surface and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials after sport and energy drink cyclic immersions. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):578.
4. Özdemir ZM, Sürmelioğlu DG. Assessment of Bleaching Treatments With The Ohip-14 Survey. Current Research in Dental Sciences. 2024 Oct 10;34(4):258-63.
5. van Sambeek RM, de Vos R, Crins LA, Bronkhorst E, Mehta SB, Pereira-Cenci T, Loomans BA. Perception of oral health related quality of life and orofacial aesthetics following restorative treatment of tooth wear: a five-year follow-up. Journal of Dentistry. 2023 Sep 1;136:104626.
6. Paravina RD, Aleksić A, Tango RN, García-Beltrán A, Johnston WM, Ghinea RI. Harmonization of color measurements in dentistry. Measurement. 2021 Feb 1;169:108504.
7. Ferreira AC, de Lima Oliveira RF, Amorim AA, Geng-Vivanco R, de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza F. Remineralization of caries-affected dentin and color stability of teeth restored after treatment with silver diamine fluoride and bioactive glass–ceramic. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022 Jul;26(7):4805-16.
8. Naumann M, Happe A, Holtkamp A, Blender SM. Monolithic Hybrid Abutment Crowns (Screw‐Retained) Versus Monolithic Hybrid Abutments With Monolithic Crowns (Adhesively Cemented): Three‐Year Data of a Prospective Clinical Split‐Mouth Study. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2024.
9. Buban A. Retrospective Analysis of Restorative Treatment Rendered to Primary Maxillary Canines Under General Anesthesia (Master's thesis, The Ohio State University).
10. Komandla DR, Acharya SR, Pentapati KC. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer and glass hybrid restorative materials simulated by tooth brushing: An in-vitro study. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2021 Nov 15;21:e0259.
11. Loo CA. Measurement of Volumetric and Vertical Wear of Printed Polymer Resin and Milled Polymer Infused Ceramic Network Final Restorative Materials (Master's thesis, The Ohio State University).
12. Mikeli A, Walter MH, Rau SA, Raedel M, Raedel M. Three-year clinical performance of posterior monolithic zirconia single crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022 Dec 1;128(6):1252-7.
13. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Operative dentistry. 1996 Mar 1;21:73-80.
14. Shamsah L, Alawjali S. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Libyan General Dentists and Specialists toward Cavity Disinfectants before Composite Restorations: A Cross-sectional Survey. AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences. 2025 Jan 2:20-31.
15. Schmalz G, Schwendicke F, Hickel R, Platt JA. Alternative direct restorative materials for dental amalgam: A concise review based on an FDI policy statement. international dental journal. 2024 Aug 1;74(4):661-8.