IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IMPLEMENTATION ON PATIENT VISIT VOLUME IN AN ACADEMIC OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINIC

Main Article Content

Dr Suneel Narahari
Sruthi Bhagyam
D Jothieswari
S Ooha
G Nandini

Keywords

.

Abstract

Having electronic health records (EHRs) is now a standard part of healthcare delivery. We designed this study to measure the number of patients seen at the clinic before and after the introduction of EHR in the clinic. Our analysis involved going over patient visit numbers by session and checking the staff support given to established faculty ophthalmologists. In five sequential years, starting in the year prior to EHR introduction, data were gathered from July to October each year. Only eight of the surgeons reviewed satisfied our criteria. The number of patient visits was lower in every year after EHR adoption compared to the first year (p ≤ 0.027). The number of patients treated per practitioner fell by 16.9% on average over the four years (the range was between 15.3% and 18.5%). For the group, the patient volume seen per session in the last year did not equal their pre-EHR numbers. The number of support staff did not change during the time frame of the study (p > 0.2). Changing to EHR was related to fewer patient visits per clinic session in an academic outpatient center with a constant number of support staff. In these types of clinics, needing more support staff may help maintain both the clinic’s schedule and patients’ ease of access.

Abstract 34 | Pdf Downloads 16

References

1. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, ARRA Division A Title XIII and Division B Title IV. 2009.
2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. EHR Incentive Program.
3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Payment Adjustments and Hardship Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals.
4. Boland MV. Meaningful use of electronic health records in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:2239–40.
5. Nguyen L, Bellucci E, Nguyen LT. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:779–96.
6. Mertz L. Electronic health records usher in a new era in health care. IEEE Pulse. 2012;3:43–50.
7. Grinspan ZM, Banerjee S, Kaushal R, Kern LM. Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform. 2013;4:225–40.
8. Kokkonen EW, Davis SA, Lin HC, Dabade TS, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB., Jr Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:e33–8.
9. Boland MV, Chiang MF, Lim MC, Wedemeyer L, Epley KD, McCannel CA, et al. Adoption of electronic health records and preparation for demonstrating meaningful use: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1702–10.
10. Hsiao CJ, Hing E. Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;111:1–8.
11. DeBry PW. Considerations for choosing an electronic medical record for an ophthalmology practice. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:590–6.
12. Chiang MF, Boland MV, Brewer A, Epley KD, Horton MB, Lim MC, et al. Special requirements of electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1681–7.
13. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:116–26.
14. Ayatollahi H, Mirani N, Haghani H. Electronic health records: what are the most important barriers? Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014;11:1c.
15. Kruse CS, Regier V, Rheinboldt KT. Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States. JMIR Med Inform. 2014;2:e26.
16. Samaan ZM, Klein MD, Mansour ME, DeWitt TG. The impact of electronic health record on an academic pediatric primary care center. J Ambul Care Manage. 2009;32:180–7.
17. Cheriff AD, Kapur AG, Qiu M, Cole CL. Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79:492–500.
18. Swanson T, Dostal J, Eichhorst B, Jernigan C, Knox M, Roper K. Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs. Acad Med. 1997;72:607–12.
19. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1963.
20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physician Supply and Demand: Projections to 2020. http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/supplydemand/medicine/physician2020projections.pdf. 2006. Accessed 29 May 2015.
21. Arya R, Salovich DM, Ohman-Strickland P, Merlin MA. Impact of scribes on performance indicators in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:490–4.
22. Bank AJ, Obetz C, Konrardy A, Khan A, Pillai KM, McKinley BJ, et al. Impact of scribes on patient interaction, productivity, and revenue in a cardiology clinic: a prospective study. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:399–406.
23. Chiang MF, Read-Brown S, Tu DC, Choi D, Sanders DS, Hwang TS, et al. Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis) Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013;111:70–92.
24. Pandit RR, Boland MV. The impact of an electronic health record transition on a glaucoma subspecialty practice. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:753–60.
25. Redd TK, Read-Brown S, Choi D, Yackel TR, Tu DC, Chiang MF. Electronic health record impact on productivity and efficiency in an academic pediatric ophthalmology practice. J AAPOS. 2014;18:584–9.
26. Lim MC, Patel RP, Lee VS, Weeks PD, Barber MK, Watnik MR. The longer-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:329819.
27. Singh RP, Bedi R, Li A, Kulkami S, Rodstrom T, Altus G, et al. The practice of electronic health record system implementation within a large multispecialty ophthalmic practice. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:668–74.
28. Devine EB, Hollingworth W, Hansen RN, Lawless NM, Wilson-Norton JL, Martin DP, et al. Electronic prescribing at the point of care: a time-motion study in the primary care setting. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:152–71.