A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COLLAGEN SHEET DRESSING VERSUS PETROLEUM GAUZE DRESSING IN REDUCING PAIN AT SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT DONOR SITE IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN SOUTH KERALA.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Collagen sheet dressing, petroleum gauze dressing, split skin graft, Post-operative complications,
Abstract
Split thickness skin graft harvesting results in a partial thickness injury, which takes 10-14 days for the donor-site wound to heal, after which it may be used again when more grafts are required. Proper management of the donor site is important to accelerate re-epithelialization and to prevent significant complications, out of which pain is the most frequent complaint. The primary objective was to compare collagen sheet dressing with traditional petroleum gauze dressing in controlling post-operative pain on the split thickness skin graft donor area. A longitudinal comparative study involving 62 patients was conducted at a tertiary healthcare center in Thiruvananthapuram. Patients undergoing split thickness skin grafting with comparable wound sizes were selected and were divided into two groups, among which one group was dressed with collagen sheet and the other with petroleum gauze dressing. Assessment of post-operative pain was done using NPR scale from 0 to 10, were patients verbally select a value, most in line with the intensity of pain that they have experienced in the last 24 hours. Data was coded, entered in MS Excel and was analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Chi square tests and unpaired t test were done to test the statistical association and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Both the studied groups were comparable in age and gender wise distribution. The collagen sheet dressing was found to reduce pain in the donor area post operatively, reduction in soakage at the donor site, and more area of epithelization when compared to that of petroleum gauze dressing and these associations were found to be statistically significant. This study revealed that Collagen sheet dressing helped to achieve better reduction in pain at donor area of split thickness skin grafting compared to Petroleum gauze dressing. It was also observed that collagen sheet dressing was superior to Petroleum gauze dressing to reduce soakage and to promote epithelialization at donor area of split thickness skin grafting.
References
2. Stenzel KH, Miyata T, Rubin AL. Collagen as a biomaterial. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1974;3(0):231 53
3. Terrill PJ, Goh RCW, Bailey MJ. Split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a comparative study of two absorbent dressings. J Wound Care. 2007 Nov;16(10):433 8
4. A. M, Umakumar K, P. S. Polyethylene Surgical Drape Dressing for Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Areas. In: Gore M, editor. Skin Grafts InTech; 2013
5. Kheiri A, Amini S, Javidan AN, Saghafi MM, Khorasani G. The effects of Alkanna tinctoria Tausch on split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized, blinded placebo-controlled trial. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 May 8;17(1):253.
6. Akhoondinasab MR, Akhoondinasab M, Saberi M. Comparison of healing effect of aloe vera extract and silver sulfadiazine in burn injuries in experimental rat model. World J Plast Surg. 2014 Jan;3(1):29 34.
7. Ramesh B, Jayalakshmi B, Mohan J. A comparative study of collagen dressing versus petrolatum gauze dressing in reducing pain at the donor area. J Cutan Aesthetic Surg. 2017;10(1):18.
8. Donovan ML, Muller MJ, Simpson C, Rudd M, Paratz J. Interim pressure garment therapy (4-6 mmHg) and its effect on donor site healing in burn patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Apr 26;17(1):214.
9. Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):298 306.
10. Zidan SM, Eleowa SA, Nasef MA, Abd-Almoktader MA, Elbatawy AM, Borhamy AG, et al. Maximizing the safety of glycerol preserved human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. 2015 Nov;41(7):1498 503.
11. Hakkarainen T, Koivuniemi R, Kosonen M, Escobedo-Lucea C, Sanz-Garcia A, Vuola J, et al. Nanofibrillar cellulose wound dressing in skin graft donor site treatment. J Control Release Off J Control Release Soc. 2016 Dec 28;244(Pt B):292 301.
12. method to minimize pain in the split-thickness skin graft donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jun;111(7):2243 9.
13. Bujang-Safawi E, Halim AS, Khoo TL, Dorai AA. Dried irradiated human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing for facial burns--a 7-year case series. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. 2010 Sep;36(6):876 82.
14. Horch RE, Stark GB. Comparison of the effect of a collagen dressing and a polyurethane dressing on the healing of split thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998 Dec;32(4):407 13.
15. Lazovic G, Colic M, Grubor M, Jovanovic M. The application of collagen sheet in open wound healing*. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005 Sep 30;18(3):151 6.
16. Fleck CA, Simman R. Modern collagen wound dressings: function and purpose. J Am Coll Certif Wound Spec. 2010 Sep;2(3):50 4.
17. Sreekumar N, Bhandari P, Praveen N. Comparative study of collagen and paraffin gauze dressing on skin graft donor site. Indian J Burns. 2015;23(1):81.
18. Serebrakian AT, Pickrell BB, Varon DE, Mohamadi A, Grinstaff MW, Rodriguez EK, et al. Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Skin Graft Donor-site Dressings with Future Guidelines. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1928.
19. Janis JE, Kwon RK, Lalonde DH. A practical guide to wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):230e 44e
20. Laato M, Heino J, Gerdin B, Kähäri VM, Niinikoski J. Interferon-gamma-induced inhibition of wound healing in vivo and in vitro. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2001;90 Suppl 215:19 23
21. Giagulli C, Ottoboni L, Caveggion E, Rossi B, Lowell C, Constantin G, et al. Chemoattractant Mediated Outside-In Signaling Involved in Sustained Adhesion. J Immunol. 2006 Jul 1;177(1):604 11.