A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY TO ASSESS THE PHYSICAL FITNESS INDEX IN MEDICAL STUDENTS

Main Article Content

DR.T.Hari Prasad
DR. Thyelnai Dawn Khaling
DR.B.V. SURENDRA

Keywords

physical fitness index, Harvard step test, Medical Students

Abstract

BACKGROUND:  The physical fitness index assesses both physical fitness for muscular work and capacity to recover from it. The Harvard Step Test (HST) examines an individual's physical fitness.  The present study was conducted to find the physical fitness Index of MBBS students using the Harvard step test and to compare the physical fitness between male and female medical students


MATERIALS AND METHODS:  The present cross-sectional Study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool. The subjects selected for this study were first year medical students admitted for first MBBS course and physical fitness index was measured using Modified Harvard Step test and physical fitness was compared between male and female medical students. Data was analysed using SPSS version 21.


RESULTS: For 100 students, interpretation of the PFI scores was found to be poor for 57%, low average for 4%, average for 6%, good for 22%, and excellent for 11% of students. Among male participants, distribution of poor, low average, average, good, and excellent PFI was 46%, 4%, 8%, 26% & 17% respectively. Among female participants, distribution of poor, low average, high average, good,  and excellent PFI was 68%, 4%, 4%, 18%, and 6% respectively.


 


CONCLUSION: This study concluded that medical students lacked adequate levels of physical fitness, whereas male students were more physically fit than female students. Academic curriculum should include and aggressively concentrate on students' physical exercise, encouraging them to incorporate a healthy lifestyle into their everyday routines. If adopted, it might dramatically reduce the burden of noncommunicable illnesses in the future.

Abstract 72 | PDF Downloads 168

References

1. Clarke H.H. Basic understanding of physical fitness. Physical fitness Research Digest series 1971; 1:2.
2. Brouha L. The step test, a simple method of measuring physical fitness for muscular work in young men. Res. Quart 1843;14:36-37.
3. Elbel ER, Reid K.N. et al Comparison of certain test of physical fitness and certain bodily measurements. J. App/Physiol 1958.12:37.
4. Sunil KR, Das Determination of physical fitness index (PFI) with modified Harvard step test (HST) in young men and women. Ind J physiol and Allied sci 1993; 47(2): 73-76.
5. Rhyming I. A modified Harvard step test for the evaluation of physical fitness. Arbeits Physiologie 1953; 15 (3):235- 50.
6. Pansare MS.Physiology of Fitness. Medical J of Western India 1986; 14:18-20
7. Cheevers A, Pettersen C: Harvard step test. Hoge Schoolvan Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute of Allied and HealthEducation European school of Physiotherapy; 2007
8. Das SK, Mahapatra S, Bhattacharya G, et al. : Determination of physical fitness index (PFI) with modified Harvard step test (HST) in youngmenand women. Indian J. Physiol. Allied Sci. 1993; 47 (2): 73–76.
9. Wuest DA, Bucher CA. Historical foundations of physical education and sport. 13th Ed. Boston, Mass: WCB/McGraw Hill; 1999: 146-193.
10. Brouha L. The step test, a simple method of measuring physical fitness for muscular work in young men. Res. Quart 1843; 14:36-37.
11. Sunil KR, Das et al. Determination of physical fitness index(PFI) with modified Harvard step test(HST) in young men and women. Ind J Physiol and Allied Sci, 1993; 47(2) 73-76.
12. Ian Gregg and A. J. Nunn, Peak Expiratory flow in normal subjects. British Medical Journal 1973, 3.282-284.
13. P. K. Banerjee, S Chatterjee. Harvard Step Test as a measure of physical fitness in adolescent boys. Ind J Med. Res. 1983 ; 79-413-417.
14. Elbel ER, Reid K.N. et al Comparison of certain test of physical fitness and certain bodily measurements. J. App/Physiol 1958.12:37.
15. Debnath P. K. Roy Dc et al A comparison of physical efficiency between Indian physical education and medical students. Brit J. sports med. 1978, 12. 93-96.