IMPACT OF TUMOR SITE ON LYMPH NODE METASTASIS AND SURVIVAL OUTCOMES IN CARCINOMA ENDOMETRIUM: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE- INSTITUTION STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr Ashitha Remani Gangadharan
Dr Nila S Pradeep
Dr Rachana P
Dr Adarsh Dharmarajan

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma, tumor site, lower uterine segment, lymph node metastasis, survival, retrospective study

Abstract

Background: Tumor location within the uterus may influence lymphatic spread and prognosis in endometrial carcinoma. Understanding these patterns is essential for risk stratification and tailoring treatment strategies.


Objective: To evaluate the relationship between primary tumor site in the endometrial cavity and its association with lymph node metastasis, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative-intent treatment.


Methods: This retrospective study included 156 patients with non-metastatic carcinoma endometrium who underwent curative surgery at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and December 2020. Clinicopathological features, tumor site, nodal status, and survival data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29.0.


Results: Mean patient age was 57.65±9.24 years. Most tumors (66%) were endometrioid histology. Tumors involving the lower uterine segment (LUS) were more common in younger, premenopausal women and were associated with high-grade histology, increased lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), deep myometrial invasion, cervical involvement, and advanced FIGO stage. Lymph node metastasis was observed in 14% of cases. Mean overall survival was highest in fundal tumors (94.6 months) and lowest in LUS tumors (74.3 months). Disease-free survival followed a similar trend.


Conclusion: Lower uterine segment involvement is associated with aggressive pathological features and poorer survival outcomes in endometrial cancer. Tumor location should be considered in prognostic evaluation and treatment planning.

Abstract 50 | Pdf Downloads 127

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
2. Indian Council of Medical Research. Consensus Document for Management of Uterine Cancer. ICMR, 2019.
3. Chaurasia B. Human Anatomy, 5th ed., Volume 2. CBS Publishers; 392.
4. Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza MR, et al. FIGO Cancer Report 2021. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;20 Oct.
5. Masuda K, Banno K, Yanokura M, et al. Carcinoma of the Lower Uterine Segment (LUS): Clinicopathological Characteristics and Association with Lynch Syndrome. Curr Genomics. 2011;12(1):25–9.
6. Bartosch C, Pires-Luís AS, Meireles C, et al. Pathologic Findings in Prophylactic and Nonprophylactic Hysterectomy Specimens of Patients With Lynch Syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:1177–91.
7. Gouthaman S, Saravanan R, Maharajan S, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of carcinoma endometrium at a tertiary care centre in Chennai – a retrospective study. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2021;8(29):2625–32. doi:10.18410/jebmh/2021/484
8. Kumar D, Noushad N, Viswanathan M, Sharma A. Endometrial Carcinoma: Survival Analysis at a Tertiary Care Center in India. Indian J Gynecol Oncol. 2022;20:69. doi:10.1007/s40944-022-00672-7
9. Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L, Momenimovahed Z. Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer in the World: A Narrative Review. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2024;51(7):169.
10. Zhen Y, Zhang X. Clinicopathological Features, Molecular Mechanisms, and Prognosis of Microcystic, Elongated, and Fragmented (MELF) Pattern in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Review. Gynecol Obstet Clin Med. 2024.
11. Doll KM, Tseng J, Denslow SA, Fader AN, Gehrig PA. High-grade endometrial cancer: Revisiting the impact of tumor size and location on outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):44–49. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.023
12. Suchetha S, Mathew AP, Rema P, Thomas S. Pattern of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: A Single Institution Experience. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021;12(1):73–77. doi:10.1007/s13193-020-01227-y
13. Wang H, Xiao Y, Cai Y, Zhou Y, et al. Clinicopathological Features and Prognoses of Lower Uterine Segment Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. Int J Womens Health. 2024;16:1401–1411.