INVESTIGATION OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF INDIGENOUS DENTAL CERAMICS USED IN PAKISTAN

Main Article Content

Dr Fatima Suhaib
Dr Madeeha Jamil
Dr Zahra Shafqat
Dr Amna Mehwish Ikram
Dr Mehvish Sajjad
Dr Zenab Yaasir

Keywords

Indigenous dental ceramics, flexural strength, microhardness, fracture resistance, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Pakistan.

Abstract

Background
Although Pakistan uses indigenous dental ceramics extensively for restorative operations, little is known about their mechanical and physical characteristics.


Objective
To evaluate and compare the flexural strength, surface hardness, fracture resistance, and microstructure of commonly used indigenous dental ceramics in Pakistan.


Methodology
A descriptive experimental study was conducted at the Department of Dental Materials, Lahore, from January to June 2024. Tests were conducted on 108 ceramic specimens from five domestic brands: VitaPak Zir (Brand E), SmileCraft Ceram (Brand D), BioZir Elite (Brand C), DentalStone Ceram (Brand B), and PacCeram Plus (Brand A).  Specimens were produced in accordance with ISO 6872.  Three-point bending was used to measure flexural strength, Vickers microhardness testing was used to measure surface hardness, and compressive loading to failure was used to measure fracture resistance.  Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze microstructural features (SEM).  One-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey testing, and descriptive statistics were used in the data analysis, with significance set at p < 0.05.


Results
All investigated attributes showed significant differences between the brands (p < 0.05). Vickers hardness (645 ± 22 VHN), fracture resistance (920 ± 35 N), flexural strength (158.4 ± 9.3 MPa), and mean grain size (1.6 ± 0.2 µm) were all greatest for Brand C. In all of these categories, Brand D had the lowest values. While Brand D had more porosity and microcracks, Brand C's better microstructure with less porosity and no microcracks was validated by SEM examination.


Conclusion
Significant variability exists among indigenous dental ceramics, with some brands offering superior mechanical properties suitable for durable restorative use.

Abstract 180 | Pdf Downloads 155

References

1. Caltabellotta C, Stadoleanu C, Calin G, Lungu II, Armenia A, Vasiliu M, Gheban D, Girbea C, Mocanu C, Stefanache A, Mihai C. NOBLE METAL CEMENTS: BALANCING ADVANTAGES AND CONSIDERATIONS IN DENTISTRY. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2024 Jan 1;16(1). DOI : 10.6261/RJOR.2024.1.16.15.
2. Bergmann CP, Stumpf A. Dental ceramics. Biomaterials. 2013 Apr:9-13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38224-6.
3. Silva LH, LIMA ED, Miranda RB, Favero SS, Lohbauer U, Cesar PF. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Brazilian oral research. 2017 Aug;31(suppl 1):e58. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0058 .
4. Ejaz M, Irfan H, Babar BZ, Haider B, Riaz Z, Khan A. Development and Characterization of Novel Dental Composites Using Locally Sourced Materials in Pakistan. Cureus. 2024 Nov 23;16(11). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74328.
5. Höland W, Schweiger M, Watzke R, Peschke A, Kappert H. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration. Expert review of medical devices. 2008 Nov 1;5(6):729-45.
https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.5.6.729
6. Rekow D, Thompson VP. Engineering long term clinical success of advanced ceramic prostheses. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2007 Jan;18:47-56.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0661-1.
7. Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Gul BE. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2007 Aug 1;98(2):120-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60045-6
8. Turon-Vinas M, Anglada M. Strength and fracture toughness of zirconia dental ceramics. Dental Materials. 2018 Mar 1;34(3):365-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.12.007
9. Zadeh PN, Lümkemann N, Sener B, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018 Dec 1;120(6):948-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.021.
10. Siddique S, Nasir S, Sadiq MS, Nawaz A, Khurshid S, Qadeer M. Evaluation of Oral Hygiene Behaviors and Their Influence on the Dental Abrasion Severity. Annals of Punjab Medical College. 2023 Dec 31;17(4):467-70. https://doi.org/10.29054/apmc/2023.1286
11. Pasha M, Muhammad N, Shahnawaz S, Najmi Y, Shahroz N, Liaqat S. Ceramic nanomaterials in dental applications. Nanoengineering of Biomaterials. 2022 Feb 14:123-44.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527832095.ch22
12. Gautam C, Joyner J, Gautam A, Rao J, Vajtai R. Zirconia based dental ceramics: structure, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications. Dalton transactions. 2016;45(48): 19194-215. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6DT03484E.
13. Huang B, Chen M, Wang J, Zhang X. Advances in zirconia-based dental materials: Properties, classification, applications, and future prospects. Journal of dentistry. 2024 Jun 10:105111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105111.
14. Kambale KR, Mahajan A, Butee SP. Effect of grain size on the properties of ceramics. Metal powder report. 2019 Jun;74(3):130-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mprp.2019.04.060.
15. White SN, Miklus VG, McLaren EA, Lang LA, Caputo AA. Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2005 Aug 1;94(2):125-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.007.
16. Cattell MJ, Clarke RL, Lynch EJ. The biaxial flexural strength and reliability of four dental ceramics—Part II. Journal of Dentistry. 1997 Sep 1;25(5):409-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00059-0.
17. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dental materials. 2004 Jun 1;20(5):449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002.

Most read articles by the same author(s)