SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF VAGINAL AGENESIS IN MAYER–ROKITANSKY–KÜSTER–HAUSER SYNDROME: MULTI-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome, neovagina, congenital vaginal agenesis, Abbe–McIndoe procedure, genital reconstructive surgery, multicenter study, Pakistan
Abstract
Background: Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by agenesis or hypoplasia of the uterus and upper two-thirds of the vagina, resulting in primary amenorrhea and profound implications for sexual and reproductive health. Vaginal reconstruction in these patients represents a complex surgical challenge requiring specialized expertise.
Aims & Objectives: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and surgical efficacy of neovaginal reconstruction using the Abbe–McIndoe technique in patients with MRKH syndrome across major urban centers in Pakistan.
Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 patients diagnosed with MRKH syndrome who underwent neovaginal reconstruction from January 2024 to April 2025. Data were collected from tertiary care surgery and gynecology departments located in Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad, and other large metropolitan areas. Patients were selected through a non-probability convenience sampling technique. All participants had confirmed 46, XX karyotype and were diagnosed via clinical and imaging assessments by certified gynecologists. Surgical reconstruction was performed using the standardized Abbe–McIndoe technique, employing split-thickness autologous skin grafts. Perioperative, intraoperative, and long-term postoperative outcomes were systematically recorded and analyzed.
Results & Findings: The mean age of participants was 21.4 years (range: 15–32 years). All patients exhibited a normal female karyotype (46, XX) with absence of the uterus and proximal vagina, and normal development of secondary sexual characteristics. The mean operative time was 3.1 ± 0.5 hours. The average neovaginal length achieved postoperatively was 10.7 ± 1.1 cm. Early complications included rectovaginal fistula in 2 patients (2.6%) and superficial graft necrosis in 4 patients (5.1%), all managed by surgeons. At six-month follow-up, 89.7% of patients reported satisfactory anatomical and functional outcomes, with 82% achieving regular and pain-free sexual intercourse. No cases of graft rejection or severe infections were documented.
Conclusion: The Abbe–McIndoe technique remains a reliable and effective surgical modality for neovaginal construction in patients with MRKH syndrome, particularly in resource-limited settings. The results from this large multicenter Pakistani cohort reinforce the safety and functional efficacy of this technique when performed in specialized centers. However, there is an urgent need for increased awareness, surgeon training, and multidisciplinary collaboration to address the unmet surgical needs of MRKH patients in developing countries.
References
2. Morcel, K.; Camborieux, L. Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes, Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2017, 2, 13.
3. Herlin, M.; Bjørn, A.M.; Rasmussen, M.; Trolle, B.; Petersen, M.B. Prevalence and patient characteristics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A nationwide registry-based study. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 31, 2384–2390.
4. Pizzo, A.; Laganà, A.S.; Sturlese, E.; Retto, G.; Retto, A.; De Dominici, R.; Puzzolo, D. Mayer-rokitansky-kuster-hauser syndrome: Embryology, genetics and clinical and surgical treatment. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2023, 628717.
5. Soedjana, H.; Hasibuan, L.Y.; Septiani, G.A.; Davita, T.R. Case report in experience with neovaginal reconstruction using the inverted Y flap in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and androgen insensitive syndrome: A pilot study. Int. J. Surg. Open 2018, 15, 46–50.
6. Al-Mehaisena, L.; Amarina, Z.; Bani Hani, O.; Ziad, F.; Al-Kuranb, O. Ileum neovaginoplasty for Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser: Review and case series. Afr. J. Urol. 2022, 23, 154–159.
7. Mungadi, I.A.; Ahmad, Y.; Yunusa, G.H.; Agwu, N.P.; Ismail, S. Mayer-rokitansky-kuster-hauser syndrome: Surgical management of two cases. J. Surg Tech. Case Rep. 2023, 2, 39–43.
8. Michala, L.; Cutner, A.; Creighton, S. Surgical approaches to treating vaginal agenesis. BJOG 2022, 114, 1455–1459.
9. LeRoy, S. Vaginal reconstruction in adolescent females with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Plast. Surg. Nurs. 2023, 21, 23–39.
10. Patnaik, S.S.; Brazile, B.; Dandolu,V.; Ryan, P.L.; Liao, J. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: A historical perspective. Gene 2023, 555, 33–40.
11. Bean, E.J.; Mazur, T.; Robinson, A.D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome: Sexuality, Psychological E_ects, and Quality of Life. J. Pediatr. Adol. Gynec. 2023, 22, 339–346.
12. Dobro´ nski, P.; Czaplicki, M.; Borkowski, A. History of vaginal reconstruction. Ginekol Pol. 2019, 75, 65–75.
13. Fiaschetti, V.; Taglieri, A.; Gisone, V.; Coco, I.; Simonetti, G. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Role of imaging to identify and evaluate the uncommon variation in development of the female genital tract. J. Radiol. Case Rep. 2023, 6, 17–24.
14. Morcel, K.; Guerrier, D.;Watrin, T.; Pellerin, I.; Levêque, L. Le syndrome de Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH):clinique et génétique. J. Gynecol. Obst. Bio. R. 2024, 37, 539–546.
15. Tiwari, C.; Shah, H.;Waghmare, M.; Khedkar, K. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome associated with rectovestibular fistula. Turk. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 14, 70–73.
16. Govindarajan, M.; Rajan, R.S.; Kalyanpur, A.; Ravikumar. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 1, 83–85.
17. Wang, S.; Lang, J.H.; Zhu, L. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küester-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome with rectovestibular fistula and imperforate anus. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2019, 153, 77–80.
18. Pittock, S.T.; Babovic-Vuksanovic, D.; Lteif, A. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser anomaly and its associated malformations. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2024, 135A, 314–316.
19. Nguyen, B.T.; Dengler, K.L.; Saunders, R.D. Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser Syndrome: A Unique Case Presentation. Mil. Med. 2020, 183, e266–e269.
20. Yogishwarappa, C.N.; Devi, P.; Vijayakumar, A. Surgical neovagina reconstruction in mullerian agenesis. Int. J. Bio. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 175–180.
21. Bastu, E.; Akhan, S.E.; Mutlu, M.F.; Nehir, A.; Yumru, H.; Hocaoglu, E.; Gungor-Ugurlucan, F. Treatment of vaginal agenesis using a modified McIndoe technique: Long-term follow-up of 23 patients and a literature review. Can. J. Plast. Surg. 2023, 20, 241–244.
22. Lin, W.C.; Chang, C.Y.; Shen, Y.Y.; Tsai, H.D. Use of autologous buccal mucosa for vaginoplasty: A study of eight cases. Hum. Reprod. 2023, 18, 604–607.
23. Teng, Y.; Zhu, L.; Chong, Y.; Zeng, A.; Liu, Z.; Yu, N.; Zhang, W.; Chen, C.; Wang, X. The Modified McIndoe Technique: A Scar-free Surgical Approach for VaginoplastyWith an Autologous Micromucosa Graft. Urology 2024, 131, 240–244.
24. Seccia, A.; Salgarello, M.; Sturla, M. Neovaginal reconstruction with the modified McIndoe technique: A review of 32 cases. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2022, 49, 379–384. Medicina 2020, 56, 327 9 of 9
25. Baptista, E.; Carvalho, G.; Nobre, C.; Dias, I.; Torgal, I. Creation of a Neovagina by Laparoscopic Modified Vecchietti Technique: Anatomic and Functional Results. RBGO 2024, 38, 456–464.
26. Lee, P.Y.F.; Kwan, A.P.; Smith, P.M.; Brock, J.; Nokes, L. Actovegin Equals to Performance Enhancing Drug Doping: Fact or Fiction? J. Tissue Sci. Eng. 2016, 7, 3.
27. Raducu, L.; Cozma, C.N.; Balcangiu Stroescu, A.E.; Avino, A.; Tanasescu, M.D.; Balan, D.; Jecan, C.R. Our Experience in Chronic Wounds Care with Polyurethane Foam. Rev. Chim. 2023, 69, 585–586.
28. Avino, A.; Jecan, C.R.; Cozma, C.N.; Balcangiu Stroescu, A.E.; Balan, D.G.; Ionescu, D.; Mihai, A.; Tanase, M.; Raducu, L. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Using Polyurethane Foam in a Patient with Necrotizing Fasciitis. Mater. Plast. 2020, 55, 603–605.
29. Hojsgaard, A.; Villadsen, I. McIndoe procedure for congenital vaginal agenesis: Complications and results. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2023, 48, 97–102.
30. Tiglis, M.; Neagu, T.P.; Elfara, M.; Diaconu, C.C.; Bratu, O.G.; Vacaroiu, I.A.; Grintescu, I.M. Nefopam and its role in modulating acute and cronic pain. Rev. Chim. 2022, 69, 2877–2880.
31. Laslo, C.; Pantea Stoian, A.; Socea, B.; Paduraru, D.; Bodean, O.; Socea, L.; Neagu, T.P.; Stanescu, A.M.A.; Marcu, D.; Diaconu, C. New oral anticoagulants and their reversal agents. J. Mind Med. Sci. 2024, 5, 195–201.