ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ANTICHOLINERGIC BURDEN AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES (ADL AND IADL) IN OLDER ADULTS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Rani Manju
Dilip Chandrasekaran
Linu P Mohan
Santhosh M Mathews4

Keywords

Anticholinergic burden, ADL, IADL, functional decline, elderly, geriatric pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Background: Anticholinergic medications are widely prescribed in older adults to manage various chronic conditions. However, these drugs are associated with adverse outcomes, including functional decline.


Objective: This study examined the association between cumulative anticholinergic burden and functional performance, specifically Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), in an elderly population.


Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among 235 individuals aged ≥60 years at a tertiary care hospital. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using a validated scoring system. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Katz Index for ADL and the Lawton–Brody scale for IADL at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Stratified analysis by age and gender was conducted, and statistical associations were evaluated using t-tests, regression models, and correlation coefficients.


Results: 235 older adults were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 72.4 ± 7.8 years. Females comprised 59% of the cohort (n = 139), and males accounted for 41% (n = 96). The average number of medications per participant was 6.2 ± 2.1. Hypertension (76.6%), diabetes mellitus (64.3%), and osteoarthritis (48.1%) were the most common comorbidities.


Participants were categorized into anticholinergic burden groups as follows: low burden (n = 71; 30.2%), moderate burden (n = 91; 38.7%), and high burden (n = 73; 31.1%). This distribution formed the basis for all group comparisons in subsequent analyses. Although the association between anticholinergic burden and functional decline was not statistically significant, a moderate inverse trend between burden score and IADL performance was identified. The highest burden groups consistently demonstrated lower functional independence.


Conclusion: While no significant association was found between anticholinergic burden and functional scores, the observed patterns underscore the potential role of anticholinergic exposure in age-related functional deterioration. Routine burden assessments and deprescribing strategies may help mitigate risk in older adults. 

Abstract 94 | PDF Downloads 64

References

1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. New York: United Nations; 2022. p. 10.
2. Viktil KK, Blix HS, Moger TA, Reikvam A. Polypharmacy as commonly defined is an indicator of limited value in the assessment of drug-related problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):187–95.
3. Fox C, Richardson K, Maidment ID, Savva GM, Matthews FE, Smithard D, et al. Anticholinergic medication use and cognitive impairment in the older population: the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1477–83.
4. Campbell NL, Boustani MA, Limbil TL, Ott C, Fox C, Maidment I, et al. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. Clin Interv Aging. 2009;(4):225–33.
5. Salahudeen MS, Duffull SB, Nishtala PS. Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:31.
6. Boustani M, Campbell N, Munger S, Maidment I, Fox C. Impact of anticholinergics on the aging brain: a review and practical application. Aging Health. 2008;4(3):311–20.
7. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL. JAMA. 1963;185(12):914–19.
8. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–86.
9. Dey P, Chakrabarti S, Kulhara P. Anticholinergic burden in elderly psychiatric outpatients in India: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry. 2021;63(3):254–60.
10. Sharma A, Tiwari P, Tripathi RK. Evaluation of anticholinergic burden and its effect on clinical outcomes among elderly inpatients at a public teaching hospital. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;11(4):173–77.
11. Mangoni AA, Jackson SHD. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(1):6–14.
12. Tannenbaum C, Johnell K. Estimating the burden of anticholinergic use among older adults: a review of the literature. Drugs Aging. 2014;31(12):853–61.
13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.
14. Steinman MA, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Komaiko KD, Schwartz JB. Prescribing quality in older veterans: a multifactorial intervention to improve medication appropriateness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1482–89.
15. Jamsen KM, Bell JS, Hilmer SN, Kirkpatrick CM, Ilomäki J, Le Couteur DG, et al. Effects of changes in anticholinergic burden on cognitive performance among community-dwelling older men: a prospective cohort study. Age Ageing. 2017;46(3):422–27.
16. Landi F, Russo A, Liperoti R, Barillaro C, Pahor M, Bernabei R, et al. Anticholinergic drugs and physical function among frail elderly population. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81(2):235–41.
17. Hilmer SN, Gnjidic D, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Waite L, Seibel MJ, et al. Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(9):989–95.
18. Jyrkkä J, Enlund H, Lavikainen P, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S. Association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity over three years in an elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(5):514–22.
19. Gnjidic D, Hilmer SN, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Waite L, Seibel MJ, et al. High risk prescribing and incidence of frailty among older community-dwelling men. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(3):521–8.
20. Nishtala PS, Salahudeen MS, Hilmer SN. Anticholinergics: theoretical and clinical overview. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(6):753–68.
21. Briet M, Schmartz D, Abraham P, et al. Gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs: a review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;76(4):507–15.
22. Pasina L, Djade CD, Lucca U, Nobili A. Association of anticholinergic burden with cognitive and functional decline in hospitalized elderly patients: results from the REPOSI study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(3):483–90.
23. Koyama A, Steinman M, Ensrud K, Hillier T, Yaffe K. Ten-year trajectory of potentially inappropriate medications in very old women: importance of cognitive status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(2):258–63.
24. Han L, Agostini JV, Allore HG. Cumulative anticholinergic exposure is associated with falls and fractures in older adults: a cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(5):538–44.