EVALUATION OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE BASELINE PERFUSION INDEX AND THE INCIDENCE OF HYPOTENSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERY UNDER SUBARACHNOID BLOCK– A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Rashmijit Behera
Dr. Akshaya A

Keywords

Perfusion Index, Spinal Anesthesia, Hypotension, Subarachnoid Block, Mephentermine

Abstract

Background: Hypotension is a common complication following spinal anesthesia during lower abdominal surgeries. The perfusion index (PI), a non-invasive measure of peripheral vascular tone, may serve as a predictor for the development of hypotension after spinal anesthesia.


Aim: To evaluate the correlation between baseline perfusion index and the incidence of hypotension in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under subarachnoid block.


Methods: A prospective observational comparative cohort study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups based on baseline PI: Group A (PI ≤ 3.5) and Group B (PI > 3.5). Incidence of hypotension, blood pressure trends, and changes in PI after mephentermine administration were recorded and analyzed.


Results: The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in Group B (30%) compared to Group A (6.66%). Group B showed greater decreases in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures post-spinal anesthesia. The baseline PI cutoff value of >3.5 predicted hypotension with a sensitivity of 81.82% and specificity of 53.06%. PI significantly decreased after administration of mephentermine, indicating increased vascular tone.


Conclusion: Baseline perfusion index is a useful, non-invasive predictor of hypotension in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients with PI > 3.5 are at higher risk of hypotension and may benefit from closer hemodynamic monitoring and early intervention.

Abstract 74 | PDF Downloads 66

References

1. Jadon A., 2009, “Complications of regional and general anaesthesia in obstetric practice,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009, 53(5): 543-548.
2. NganKee W\.D., 2010, “The use of vasopressors during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2010, 23(3): 319–325.
3. Ryu J.H., 2009, “The effect of phenylephrine and ephedrine on cerebral oxygenation during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2009, 109(1): 49–55.
4. Duggappa D.R., 2017, “Perfusion index: A simple and reliable tool for monitoring peripheral perfusion in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2017, 31(2): 289–295.
5. Lima A., 2012, “Monitoring perfusion in critically ill patients: an update for the intensivist,” Annals of Intensive Care, 2012, 2(1): 9.
6. Shelley K.H., 2007, “Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2007, 105(6 Suppl): S31–S36.
7. Hanss R., 2005, “Overweight patients: is there an increased risk of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section?” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2005, 100(3): 789–795.
8. Toyama S., 2013, “Perfusion index derived from a pulse oximeter can predict the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2013, 27(3): 243–247.
9. Kim J.T., 2009, “The perfusion index derived from a pulse oximeter can predict low systemic vascular resistance after induction of anesthesia,” ActaAnaesthesiologicaScandinavica, 2009, 53(9): 1120–1124.
10. Kus A., 2015, “Perfusion index as a predictor of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section,” Medical Science Monitor, 2015, 21: 298–304.
11. Clark V.A., 2012, “Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a review,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2012, 114(3): 669–676.
12. Shital K., 2018, “A comparative study of different fluid preloading in preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia,” International Journal of Scientific Research, 2018, 7(4): 1–3.
13. Moran D.H., 1991, “Phenylephrine versus ephedrine: effects on uterine blood flow in pregnant ewes,” Anesthesiology, 1991, 75(5): 913–918.
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2011, “Caesarean section: clinical guideline,” NICE Clinical Guidelines, 2011, 132: 1–45.
15. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia, 2016, “Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report,” Anesthesiology, 2016, 124(2): 270–300.
16. Toyama Y., "Perfusion index as a predictor of hypotension after spinal anesthesia," Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2016, 123(4): 956-961.
17. Mallawaarachchi S., "Influence of demographic factors on perfusion index and hypotension prediction," Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 2018, 34(2): 233-240.
18. Gupta N., "Body mass index and its relation to spinal anesthesia induced hypotension," Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017, 61(7): 561-566.
19. Mavish M., "Correlation of BMI and hemodynamic changes in spinal anesthesia," Anesthesiology Research, 2019, 45(1): 12-18.
20. Patodi S., "Perfusion index and prediction of spinal anesthesia hypotension," International Journal of Anesthesiology, 2015, 54(3): 145-150.
21. Dugappa P., "Comparative analysis of perfusion index values and blood pressure after spinal anesthesia," Asian Journal of Anesthesia, 2020, 38(6): 470-477.
22. George S., "Peripheral vascular tone and perfusion index variations in anesthetized patients," Journal of Perioperative Medicine, 2017, 32(4): 297-302.
23. Mahvish R., "Mean arterial pressure changes and baseline perfusion index," International Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2019, 47(5): 378-383.
24. Pradhan L., "Hemodynamic impact of baseline perfusion index in spinal anesthesia," Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Science, 2018, 42(3): 209-215.