EVALUATION OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE BASELINE PERFUSION INDEX AND THE INCIDENCE OF HYPOTENSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERY UNDER SUBARACHNOID BLOCK– A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Perfusion Index, Spinal Anesthesia, Hypotension, Subarachnoid Block, Mephentermine
Abstract
Background: Hypotension is a common complication following spinal anesthesia during lower abdominal surgeries. The perfusion index (PI), a non-invasive measure of peripheral vascular tone, may serve as a predictor for the development of hypotension after spinal anesthesia.
Aim: To evaluate the correlation between baseline perfusion index and the incidence of hypotension in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under subarachnoid block.
Methods: A prospective observational comparative cohort study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups based on baseline PI: Group A (PI ≤ 3.5) and Group B (PI > 3.5). Incidence of hypotension, blood pressure trends, and changes in PI after mephentermine administration were recorded and analyzed.
Results: The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in Group B (30%) compared to Group A (6.66%). Group B showed greater decreases in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures post-spinal anesthesia. The baseline PI cutoff value of >3.5 predicted hypotension with a sensitivity of 81.82% and specificity of 53.06%. PI significantly decreased after administration of mephentermine, indicating increased vascular tone.
Conclusion: Baseline perfusion index is a useful, non-invasive predictor of hypotension in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients with PI > 3.5 are at higher risk of hypotension and may benefit from closer hemodynamic monitoring and early intervention.
References
2. NganKee W\.D., 2010, “The use of vasopressors during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2010, 23(3): 319–325.
3. Ryu J.H., 2009, “The effect of phenylephrine and ephedrine on cerebral oxygenation during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2009, 109(1): 49–55.
4. Duggappa D.R., 2017, “Perfusion index: A simple and reliable tool for monitoring peripheral perfusion in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2017, 31(2): 289–295.
5. Lima A., 2012, “Monitoring perfusion in critically ill patients: an update for the intensivist,” Annals of Intensive Care, 2012, 2(1): 9.
6. Shelley K.H., 2007, “Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2007, 105(6 Suppl): S31–S36.
7. Hanss R., 2005, “Overweight patients: is there an increased risk of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section?” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2005, 100(3): 789–795.
8. Toyama S., 2013, “Perfusion index derived from a pulse oximeter can predict the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2013, 27(3): 243–247.
9. Kim J.T., 2009, “The perfusion index derived from a pulse oximeter can predict low systemic vascular resistance after induction of anesthesia,” ActaAnaesthesiologicaScandinavica, 2009, 53(9): 1120–1124.
10. Kus A., 2015, “Perfusion index as a predictor of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section,” Medical Science Monitor, 2015, 21: 298–304.
11. Clark V.A., 2012, “Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a review,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2012, 114(3): 669–676.
12. Shital K., 2018, “A comparative study of different fluid preloading in preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia,” International Journal of Scientific Research, 2018, 7(4): 1–3.
13. Moran D.H., 1991, “Phenylephrine versus ephedrine: effects on uterine blood flow in pregnant ewes,” Anesthesiology, 1991, 75(5): 913–918.
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2011, “Caesarean section: clinical guideline,” NICE Clinical Guidelines, 2011, 132: 1–45.
15. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia, 2016, “Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report,” Anesthesiology, 2016, 124(2): 270–300.
16. Toyama Y., "Perfusion index as a predictor of hypotension after spinal anesthesia," Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2016, 123(4): 956-961.
17. Mallawaarachchi S., "Influence of demographic factors on perfusion index and hypotension prediction," Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 2018, 34(2): 233-240.
18. Gupta N., "Body mass index and its relation to spinal anesthesia induced hypotension," Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017, 61(7): 561-566.
19. Mavish M., "Correlation of BMI and hemodynamic changes in spinal anesthesia," Anesthesiology Research, 2019, 45(1): 12-18.
20. Patodi S., "Perfusion index and prediction of spinal anesthesia hypotension," International Journal of Anesthesiology, 2015, 54(3): 145-150.
21. Dugappa P., "Comparative analysis of perfusion index values and blood pressure after spinal anesthesia," Asian Journal of Anesthesia, 2020, 38(6): 470-477.
22. George S., "Peripheral vascular tone and perfusion index variations in anesthetized patients," Journal of Perioperative Medicine, 2017, 32(4): 297-302.
23. Mahvish R., "Mean arterial pressure changes and baseline perfusion index," International Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2019, 47(5): 378-383.
24. Pradhan L., "Hemodynamic impact of baseline perfusion index in spinal anesthesia," Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Science, 2018, 42(3): 209-215.