A STUDY ON COMPLICATIONS SEEN IN MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURIES TREATED BY TRADITIONAL BONE SETTERS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Traditional bone setters, fracture complications, musculoskeletal injury, rural healthcare, malunion
Abstract
Traditional bone setters (TBS) remain a common source of care for musculoskeletal injuries in rural and semi-urban parts of India, despite lacking formal medical training and standardized techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the types and frequencies of complications arising from injuries initially managed by TBS and to explore the socio-demographic characteristics and motivations of the affected patients. Conducted as a cross-sectional observational study at a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka , the research included 49 patients who presented with complications following TBS intervention. Data were collected using a structured clinical proforma and analyzed for injury patterns, anatomical sites involved, types of complications, reasons for TBS patronage, and definitive treatment modalities employed upon hospital admission. The findings revealed that malunion was the most common complication (36.7%), followed by delayed union (12.2%), nonunion (10.2%), and neglected dislocations (10.2%). Additional complications such as compartment syndrome, chronic osteomyelitis, joint stiffness, and soft tissue infections were also documented. Fear of surgery (28.57%) and affordability (22.4%) were the leading reasons for choosing traditional care, often compounded by limited education and economic hardship. The study concludes that complications resulting from TBS practices are largely preventable and impose a significant burden on tertiary care resources. Public health efforts must prioritize awareness, early orthopedic referral, and structured collaboration with TBS practitioners. Integrating community health workers and culturally sensitive education can improve outcomes and reduce morbidity associated with traditional fracture care.
References
2. Garikapati, V., Konadu-Yeboah, D., Mengesha, M. G., Marenah, K., & Harrison, W. J. (2023). Systematic review of complications associated with treatment by traditional bone setters for musculoskeletal injury. Tropical Doctor, 53(1), 13-19.
3. Alam, W., Shah, F. A., Ahmed, A., Ahmad, S., & Shah, A. (2016). Traditional bonesetters: frequency of complications with treatment by traditional bonesetter. The Professional Medical Journal, 23(06), 699-704.
4. Edusei, A. K., Owusu-Ansah, F. E., Dogbe, J. A., Morgan, J., & Sarpong, K. (2015). Perspectives in musculoskeletal injury management by traditional bone setters in Ashanti, Ghana. African Journal of Disability, 4(1), 97.
5. Ekere, A. U., & Echem, R. C. (2011). Complications of fracture and dislocation treatment by traditional bone setters: a private practice experience. The Nigerian Health Journal, 11(2), 59-66.
6. Onyemaechi, N. O., Menson, W. N. A., Goodman, X., Slinkard, S., Onwujekwe, O. E., Enweani, U. N., & Ezeanolue, E. E. (2021). Complications of traditional bonesetting in contemporary fracture care in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 26(11), 1367-1377.
7. Memon, F. A., Saeed, G., Fazal, B., Bhutto, I., Laghari, M., Siddique, K. A., & Shaikh, A. R. (2009). Complications of fracture treatment by traditional bone setters at Hyderabad. J Pak Ortho Asso, 21(2), 58-64.
8. Machaku, D., Lodhia, J., Nangole, A., Chilonga, K., & Massawe, H. (2025). Loss of a limb: A consequence of traditional bone setting. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 130, 111237.
9. Seid, M. A., Walelgn, B., Kibret Sendekie, A., Walle, G. T., Geremew, M. A., Sahlu, M. H., & Abate, B. B. (2025). Utilization and associated factors of traditional bone setting service among patients with musculoskeletal injuries in Northeast Ethiopia. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 6, 1484403.
10. Soomro, Z. I., Abbasi, A. N., Shah, K. A., & Khatri, K. K. (2018). Disastrous Effects of Fracture Treatment by Traditional Bone Setters. In Medical Forum Monthly (Vol. 29, No. 9).
11. Card, E. B., Obayemi, J. E., Shirima, O., Lazaro, M., Massawe, H., Stanifer, J. W., & Sheth, N. P. (2020). Practices and perspectives of traditional bone setters in northern Tanzania. Annals of global health, 86(1), 61.
12. Esin, I. A., Bukar, Y. L., Samu, K. M., & Sambo, Y. T. (2020). a Complications Of Musculoskeletal Injuries Treated By Traditional Bonesetters In Northeastern Nigeria: A Prospective Observational Study. Jewel Journal of Medical Sciences, 1(1), 72-77.
13. Kumma, W. P., Kabalo, B. Y., & Woticha, E. W. (2013). Complications of fracture treatment by traditional bone setters in Wolaita Sodo, southern Ethiopia. J Biol, 3(12), 1.
14. Warman, P. L., Ismiarto, Y. D., & Ruhimat, U. (2018). Complications of fracture treatment by traditional bonesetters in West Java, Indonesia. Althea Medical Journal, 5(1), 47-52.
15. Nwachukwu, B. U., Okwesili, I. C., Harris, M. B., & Katz, J. N. (2011). Traditional bonesetters and contemporary orthopaedic fracture care in a developing nation: historical aspects, contemporary status and future directions. The open orthopaedics journal, 5, 20.
16. Burford, G., Bodeker, G., & Cohen, J. (2007). Traditional Orthopaedic Practices: Beyond ‘Bonesetting’. Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Policy and Public Health Perspectives, 349-386.