DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY IN THYROID SWELLING: A HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
FNAC, Thyroid Swelling, Nodules, Lesions, Histopathological etc
Abstract
Introduction- Thyroid swellings are common, with malignancy in 5–15% of cases. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a key diagnostic tool due to its accuracy and cost-effectiveness. However, regional variations necessitate local validation. This study evaluates FNAC’s diagnostic accuracy by correlating cytology with histopathology to guide optimal management.
Material and methods- This cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of 15 months after ethical approval. A total of 120 patients with palpable thyroid swellings underwent clinical evaluation, ultrasound, FNAC, and histopathological examination. FNAC smears were reported using the Bethesda System. Statistical analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC compared to histopathological outcomes.
Result- Among 120 patients with thyroid swellings, FNAC revealed 56.7% benign, 13.3% malignant, and others in indeterminate categories. Histopathology confirmed 68.3% benign and 31.7% malignant lesions, with papillary carcinoma as the most common malignancy. FNAC showed high diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 82.4%, specificity: 94.6%, accuracy: 91.7%). Significant concordance with histopathology (p < 0.001) underscores FNAC’s reliability in preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Conclusion- FNAC is a reliable, minimally invasive, and cost-effective diagnostic tool for evaluating thyroid swellings. It demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy when compared to histopathology. FNAC aids in early diagnosis, appropriate clinical management, and helps reduce unnecessary surgeries, especially in resource-limited settings. Its diagnostic utility remains invaluable.
References
2. Gharib, H., Papini, E., Garber, J. R., et al. (2010). AACE/AME/ETA medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocrine Practice, 16(Suppl 1), 1–43.
3. Baloch, Z. W., LiVolsi, V. A., Asa, S. L., et al. (2003). Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 29(6), 375–381.
4. Suri, A., Nigam, J. S., Singh, P., & Khare, P. (2014). Role of FNAC in solitary thyroid nodules. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(6), FC01–FC03.
5. Cibas, E. S., & Ali, S. Z. (2009). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 132(5), 658–665.
6. Ali, S. Z., & Cibas, E. S. (2018). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (2nd ed.). Springer.
7. Yang, J., Schnadig, V., Logrono, R., & Wasserman, P. G. (2007). Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer Cytopathology, 111(5), 306–315.
8. Gurleyik, G., Gurleyik, E., & Cetin, F. (2009). Fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: An evaluation of its accuracy and correlation with histopathological findings. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 123(9), 988–991.
9. Bongiovanni, M., Spitale, A., Faquin, W. C., Mazzucchelli, L., & Baloch, Z. W. (2012). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A meta-analysis. Acta Cytologica, 56(4), 333–339.
10. Amrikachi, M., Ramzy, I., Rubenfeld, S., & Wheeler, T. M. (2001). Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of thyroid: A review of 6226 cases and correlation with surgical and clinical outcome. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 125(4), 484–488.
11. Unnikrishnan, A. G., & Menon, U. V. (2011). Thyroid disorders in India: An epidemiological perspective. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 15(Suppl 2), S78–S81
12. Goyal S, et al. Female predominance in thyroid disorders: A clinical study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;22(1):110-114.
13. Singh S, et al. Gender differences in thyroid disease: a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(6):OE01-OE06.
14. Das S, et al. Age distribution of thyroid nodules in Indian population. Endocr Pract. 2019;25(7):688-693.
15. Li Q, et al. Epidemiology of thyroid nodules in China: A population-based study. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248019.
16. Sharma R, et al. Cytological spectrum of thyroid lesions: An experience from a tertiary care center. J Cytol. 2017;34(3):137-141.
17. Khan A, et al. Hemorrhagic aspirates in thyroid FNAC: Clinical significance. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46(8):650-656.
18. Rahman MT, et al. Role of ultrasound in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. BMC Med Imaging. 2016;16(1):23.
19. Lee HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic features of thyroid nodules correlated with histopathology. Thyroid. 2020;30(2):198-206.
20. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(2):137-143.
21. Al-Jabr I, et al. Risk stratification using Bethesda categories in thyroid FNAC. Ann Saudi Med. 2019;39(6):387-394.
22. Gupta N, et al. Histopathological profile of thyroid lesions: A study from India. J Thyroid Res. 2015;2015:758245.
23. Wang Y, et al. Clinicopathological features of thyroid carcinoma in Chinese patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9(15):12515-12524.
24. Bongiovanni M, et al. Accuracy of FNAC in thyroid nodules: Meta-analysis. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(11):976-985.
25. Wang Y, et al. FNAC diagnostic performance in thyroid nodules: A review. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(7):513-521.
26. Yassa L, et al. The diagnostic value of FNAC in thyroid nodules. Cancer. 2010;118(9):2142-2149.
27. Moon WJ, et al. FNAC accuracy in thyroid nodule diagnosis: A multicenter study. Thyroid. 2014;24(4):660-665.
28. Haugen BR, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133.