HEALING TIME COMPARISON BETWEEN IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED DENTAL IMPLANTS

Main Article Content

Dr Syed Yousif Ali Shah
Dr Huzaifa Saeed ul Khair
Dr Sameen Baleegh Ur Rehman
Dr Ismatullah Qureshi
Dr Fahad Aslam Shujrah
Dr Zaheer Ahmed Soomro

Keywords

Immediate implant, delayed implant, healing time, bone loss, implant survival, dental implants, post-operative outcomes

Abstract

Background
The practice of replacing teeth with dental implants has garnered considerable acceptance. The timing of implant placement, immediate versus delayed, has implications for healing outcomes; however, there remains a clinical controversy regarding which protocol is more beneficial. Examine the postoperative recovery period, healing time, and early bone resorption in the area around the implant site in patients with immediate versus delayed dental implants.


Methods
This observational study was conducted at Bibi Aseefa Dental College, SMBB Medical University, Larkana, from January 2023 to January 2024. A total of 63 patients requiring single-tooth implants were enrolled and divided into two groups: immediate implant placement (n = 31) and delayed implant placement (n = 32). Data were collected on demographic variables, implant site, primary stability, and the use of bone grafts. Healing time, pain duration, soft tissue response, implant survival, and marginal bone loss were recorded and statistically compared.


Results
Patients in the immediate implant group demonstrated significantly faster healing (mean: 9.3 ± 1.6 weeks) compared to the delayed group (mean: 12.1 ± 1.9 weeks, p < 0.001). Post-operative pain duration was also shorter among immediate cases (p = 0.006). Although both groups had similar implant survival rates, the immediate group showed less bone loss at three months (p = 0.004), with no significant difference in soft tissue healing.


Conclusion
Immediate dental implant placement results in shorter healing time and reduced bone loss without compromising implant stability or soft tissue outcomes. When performed under appropriate clinical conditions, immediate placement may offer both functional and esthetic advantages over the delayed approach.

Abstract 83 | pdf Downloads 26

References

1. Garcia‐Sanchez, R., et al., Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical oral implants research, 2022. 33(3): p. 231-277.
2. Singh, G., et al., Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 2021. 13(Suppl 2): p. S1309-S1314.
3. Eini, E., et al., Comparing success of immediate versus delay loading of implants in fresh sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022: p. 1-10.
4. Chatzopoulos, G.S. and L.F. Wolff, Survival rates and factors affecting the outcome following immediate and delayed implant placement: a retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022. 11(15): p. 4598.
5. Troiano, G., et al., Comparison of immediate versus delayed implant placement in a failed implant site: A retrospective analysis of early implant survival. International Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021. 14(1).
6. Wang, J., et al., Immediate versus delayed temporization at posterior single implant sites: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2020. 47(10): p. 1281-1291.
7. Wu, H., et al., Failure Risk of Short Dental Implants Under Immediate Loading: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2021. 30(7): p. 569-580.
8. Anitua, E., et al., Long-Term Retrospective Study of 3.0-mm-Diameter Implants Supporting Fixed Multiple Prostheses: Immediate Versus Delayed Implant Loading. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2020. 35(6).
9. Staedt, H., et al., Potential risk factors for early and late dental implant failure: a retrospective clinical study on 9080 implants. International journal of implant dentistry, 2020. 6: p. 1-10.
10. Ibrahim, A. and B.R. Chrcanovic, Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials, 2021. 14(24): p. 7903.
11. Gjelvold, B., J. Kisch, and B.R. Chrcanovic, A randomized clinical trial comparing immediate loading and delayed loading of single-tooth implants: 5-year results. Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. 10(5): p. 1077.
12. Thanissorn, C., et al., Success rates and complications associated with single immediate implants: a systematic review. Dentistry Journal, 2022. 10(2): p. 31.
13. Menchini-Fabris, G.B., et al., Effect of different timings of implant insertion on the bone remodeling volume around patients’ maxillary single implants: a 2–3 years follow-up. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020. 17(18): p. 6790.
14. Parvini, P., et al., Immediate versus delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone: a prospective 3D volumetric assessment of peri-implant tissue stability. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 2022. 8(1): p. 58.
15. Kahn, A., et al., Patients’ perception of recovery after dental implant placement. Medicina, 2021. 57(10): p. 1111.
16. Zhao, G., et al., Long-term clinical outcomes of immediate loading versus non-immediate loading in single-implant restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022. 51(10): p. 1345-1354.
17. Pommer, B., et al., Long‐term outcomes of maxillary single‐tooth implants in relation to timing protocols of implant placement and loading: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2021. 32: p. 56-66.
18. Cao, Z.-L., et al., Immediate or delayed loading protocols for two-implant mandibular overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2021. 126(6): p. 742-748.
19. Kulkarni, V., et al., Evidence-based clinical outcomes of immediate and early loading of short endosseous dental implants: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2021. 36(1).
20. Aiquel, L.L., et al., Does the timing of implant placement and loading influence biological outcomes of implant‐supported multiple‐unit fixed dental prosthesis—A systematic review with meta‐analyses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2021. 32: p. 5-27.