“CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF ARTHROSCOPIC MULTI-LIGAMENT KNEE RECONSTRUCTION: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEMITENDINOSUS, GRACILIS, AND PERONEAL GRAFTS”
Main Article Content
Keywords
Multi-ligament knee injury, Peroneal longus graft, Semitendinosus, Gracilis, Arthroscopic reconstruction, Biomechanical stability, Donor-site morbidity, Graft survival, Clinical Outcomes, KT-1000
Abstract
Background: Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI) are complex pathologies requiring effective surgical intervention to restore joint stability and function. While autograft options such as semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (G) are commonly used in arthroscopic multi-ligament knee reconstruction, the use of peroneal longus (PL) grafts remains underexplored in clinical literature. The biomechanical properties of PL grafts, as well as their comparative effectiveness in multi-ligament reconstructions, have not been well-studied. This gap in the literature highlights the need for a prospective comparative study to evaluate the clinical outcomes and biomechanical stability associated with PL grafts in comparison to ST and G.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 60 patients (20 per group), undergoing arthroscopic multi-ligament knee reconstruction using ST, G, or PL grafts. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores at 4, 6 & 12 months. Biomechanical analysis included KT-1000 testing, side-to-side comparison, and rotational laxity evaluation (pivot-shift grading). Data were analyzed using ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests for clinical scores, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for graft integrity.
Results: Preliminary findings show that both ST and PL grafts provide comparable results in terms of biomechanical stability, with PL grafts demonstrating lower donor-site morbidity. However, ST grafts resulted in superior clinical outcomes (IKDC, Lysholm scores) in high-demand athletes. PL grafts showed less residual laxity on KT-1000 testing. The incidence of graft failure was similar between groups, with PL showing slightly better graft survival rates.
Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of PL grafts as an effective alternative for multi-ligament knee reconstruction, especially in patients seeking to minimize hamstring donor-site morbidity. Further long-term studies are required to confirm these findings and refine graft selection criteria.
References
2. Fetto, J. F., Rosenthal, M. J., & Marshall, J. L. (2022). The biomechanics of multiligament knee injuries. Sports Medicine, 52(1), 23–32.
3. Mook, W. R., Miller, M. D., Diduch, D. R., et al. (2019). Multiple-ligament knee injuries: a systematic review of outcomes. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(1), 134–140.
4. Magnussen, R. A., Lawrence, J. T., West, R. V., et al. (2012). Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after ACL reconstruction. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 94(7), 529–535.
5. Prempeh, M., Dunne, C., et al. (2020). Clinical outcomes and donor-site morbidity following peroneus longus autograft harvest for ACL reconstruction. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(4), 897–905.
6. Shi, K., Zhang, L., Chen, Y., et al. (2024). Peroneus longus tendon as a graft option for ligament reconstruction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 32(1), 85–94.
7. Rhatomy, S., Asikin, A. I. Z., Wardhana, H. A., et al. (2021). Combined semitendinosus and gracilis versus single tendon ACL reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Orthopedics Journal, 40(2), 143–150.
8. Xu, Y., Ao, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2023). A meta-analysis of hamstring autograft outcomes in ACL reconstruction: Is combined better than single? Journal of Knee Surgery, 36(5), 418–426.
9. Fang, S., Zhang, H., & Li, T. (2021). Appropriate sample size and clinical significance in knee ligament research. Journal of Clinical Research, 15(4), 212–219.
10. Noyes, F. R., & Barber, S. D. (1984). Biomechanical properties of tendon grafts used in ligament reconstruction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 196, 68–77.
11. Choi, N. H., Kim, N. M., & Victoroff, B. N. (2018). Functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 6(3), 1–6.
12. Park, S. Y., Oh, H., & Chung, H. (2020). Peroneus longus tendon as an alternative graft in revision ACL reconstruction: Biomechanical perspectives. Knee, 27(4), 1015–1021.
13. Levy, B. A., Dajani, K. A., Whelan, D. B., et al. (2010). Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: An evidence-based approach. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92(4), 984–994.
14. LaPrade, R. F., Johansen, S., Engebretsen, L., et al. (2019). Anatomic reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(2), 534–541.
15. Ardern, C. L., Webster, K. E., Taylor, N. F., & Feller, J. A. (2011). Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(3), 538–543.
16. Maletis, G. B., Inacio, M. C., Funahashi, T. T. (2015). Analysis of graft choice for ACL reconstruction: Trends and outcomes. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 97(17), 1398–1405.
17. Sharma, B., Dang, A., & Yadav, P. (2020). Biomechanical evaluation of autografts used in ACL reconstructions: A review. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 54(2), 167–173.
18. Shelbourne, K. D., & Nitz, P. (2011). Accelerated rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 41(4), 284–295.
19. Engebretsen, L., Risberg, M. A., & Bahr, R. (2020). Treatment and rehabilitation of multiligament injuries in the knee. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 38(6), 1234–1240.
20. Petersen, W., Zantop, T., & Raschke, M. J. (2021). Surgical techniques for multiligament knee injuries: Update and considerations. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 14(3), 205–217.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Raghu H R
Associate Professor, department of orthopaedics, BGS MCH Nelamangala, Bengaluru
Dr Ravi G R
Assistant Professor, department of orthopaedics, BGS medical College, Nelamangala,Bengaluru
Dr Venkatesh V
Assistant Professor, department of orthopaedics, BGS medical College, Nelamangala, Bengaluru