Evaluation Of Antibacterial Potential of Oxazole Derivative of Haemagglutinin of Porphyromonas Gingivalis Using in Silico Molecular Docking and Admet Prediction

Main Article Content

S.Padmaja
Parkavi Arumugam
Rajalakshmanan Eswaramoorthy

Keywords

Periodontitis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, In-silico analysis, virulence factor, heamaglutinin, innovation

Abstract

Introduction: Porphyromonas gingivalis is known to produce a lot of virulence factors that could pave their way into the gingivae and cause tissue damage either directly or indirectly, by induction of inflammation. Hemagglutinins are also considered important virulence factors, as they can be a pathway to acquire hemin, which is necessary for bacterial growth, from erythrocytes
Materials And Methods: The 2D structures (mol)of the oxazole compounds (PJ1-PJ8) were drawn using ChemDraw and analysed using Chem3D soNware. The homology modelling of the haemagglutinin protein was done using Swiss model.The graphical user interface program AutoDock Vina was used for ligand - protein docking simulations , the docking algorithm provided with AutoDock Vina was used to search for the best docked confirmation between ligand and protein. The SwissAdme and Protox online servers was used for estimating the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion.Statustical analysis : ANOVA(P<0.05)
Results: The SwissADME prediction outcome showed that the isolated compounds satisfy the Lipinski’s rule of five with zero violations having molecular weight less than 500 and lipophilicity values (iLogP) values less than 5.PJ2,3 and PJ5 were better compounds as they were non carcinogenic, mutagenic, cytotoxic and non immunotoxic
Conclusion: We were able to conclude from our study that the docking scores of ligands were better than the standard control drugs that were available and is found to be as a better alternative. Compounds 2,3 were found to be better drugs in exhibiting potential inhibitory action against the haemagglutinin of P.gingivalis.

Abstract 57 | PDF Downloads 51

References

1. H. Song, M. Bélanger, J. Whitlock, E. Kozarov, and A. Progulske-Fox, “Hemagglutinin B is involved in the adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis to human coronary artery endothelial cells,” Infect. Immun., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 7267–7273, Nov. 2005.
2. F. G. Iii, F. Gibson III, and C. Genco, “Porphyromonas gingivalis Mediated Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerosis:Disparate Diseases with Commonalities in Pathogenesis Through TLRs,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 13, no. 36. pp. 3665–3675, 2007. doi: 10.2174/138161207783018554.
3. J. Slots, “Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontal disease: introduction,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 20, no. 1. pp. 7–13, 1999. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00155.x.
4. J. W. Smalley, A. J. Birss, B. Szmigielski, and J. Potempa, “The HA2 haemagglutinin domain of the lysine-specific gingipain (Kgp) of Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes μ-oxo bishaem formation from monomeric iron(III) protoporphyrin IX,” Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 6. pp. 1839–1845, 2006. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28835-0.
5. N. Li et al., “The modular structure of haemagglutinin/adhesin regions in gingipains of Porphyromonas gingivalis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 81, no. 5. pp. 1358–1373, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07768.x.
6. H. Khalaf, E. Palm, and T. Bengtsson, “Cellular Response Mechanisms in Porphyromonas gingivalis Infection,” Periodontitis - A Useful Reference. 2017. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.69019.
7. Y. Ishibashi, D. A. Relman, and A. Nishikawa, “Invasion of human respiratory epithelial cells by Bordetella pertussis: possible role for a filamentous hemagglutinin Arg-Gly-Asp sequence and alpha5beta1 integrin,” Microb. Pathog., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 279–288, May 2001.
8. K. Ishihara, A. Nabuchi, R. Ito, K. Miyachi, H. K. Kuramitsu, and K. Okuda, “Correlation between detection rates of periodontopathic bacterial DNA in coronary stenotic artery plaque [corrected] and in dental plaque samples,” J. Clin. Microbiol., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1313–1315, Mar. 2004.
9. F. B. H. Al-Taweel, The Interaction of Porphyromonas Gingivalis with Host Epithelial Cells and Its Relevance to Periodontal Disease. 2017.
10. S. Aldhuwayhi et al., “Covid-19 Knowledge and Perceptions Among Dental Specialists: A Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Survey,” Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy, vol. 14, pp. 2851–2861, Jul. 2021.
11. K. Dua et al., “The potential of siRNA based drug delivery in respiratory disorders: Recent advances and progress,” Drug Dev. Res., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 714–730, Sep. 2019.
12. L. Krishnan, K. Karpagaselvi, J. Kumarswamy, U. S. Sudheendra, K. V. Santosh, and A. Patil, “Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 261–268, May-Aug 2016.
13. A. Markov et al., “Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells as a valuable source for the treatment of immune-mediated disorders,” Stem Cell Res. Ther., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 192, Mar. 2021.
14. M. Mohan and N. Jagannathan, “Oral field cancerization: an update on current concepts,” Oncol. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 244, Mar. 2014.
15. P. Neelakantan, D. Grotra, and S. Sharma, “Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis,” J. Endod., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 893–896, Jul. 2013.
16. K. Dayanidhi, P. Vadivel, S. Jothi, and N. Sheik Eusuff, “White Eggshells: A Potential Biowaste Material for Synergetic Adsorption and Naked-Eye Colorimetric Detection of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1746–1756, Jan. 2020.
17. K. Gupta et al., “Comparing eligibility for statin therapy for primary prevention under 2022 USPSTF recommendations and the 2018 AHA/ACC/ multi-society guideline recommendations: From National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,” Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., vol. 75, pp. 78–82, Aug. 2022.
18. I. Ghaffar, B. Deepanraj, L. S. Sundar, D.-V. N. Vo, A. Saikumar, and A. Hussain, “A review on the sustainable procurement of microalgal biomass from wastewaters for the production of biofuels,” Chemosphere, vol. 311, no. Pt 2, p. 137094, Nov. 2022.
19. M. Anza et al., “Antimicrobial Activity, in silico Molecular Docking, ADMET and DFT Analysis of Secondary Metabolites from Roots of Three Ethiopian Medicinal Plants,” Adv. Appl. Bioinform. Chem., vol. 14, pp. 117–132, Aug. 2021.
20. H. Venkata Subbiah, P. Ramesh Babu, and U. Subbiah, “In silico targeting of red complex bacteria virulence factors of periodontitis with β-defensin 1,” J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 59, Apr. 2022.
21. J. A. Mendoza, R. Y. Pineda, M. Nguyen, M. Tellez, and A. M. Awad, “Molecular docking studies, in-silico ADMET predictions and synthesis of novel PEGA-nucleosides as antimicrobial agents targeting class B1 metallo-β-lactamases,” In Silico Pharmacology, vol. 9, no. 1. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s40203-021-00092-z.
22. R. Sahilu, R. Eswaramoorthy, E. Mulugeta, and A. Dekebo, “Synthesis, DFT analysis, dyeing potential and evaluation of antibacterial activities of azo dye derivatives combined with in-silico molecular docking and ADMET predictions,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1265. p. 133279, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133279.