EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF TEAM-BASED LEARNING ON CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AND APPLICATION OF DENTAL MATERIALS SCIENCE IN A HYBRID CURRICULUM

Main Article Content

Ambreen Azam
Farhat Kazmi
Amna Zulfiqar
Kunza Naveed Asdaq
Saba Farooq
Hanzala Waqar

Keywords

Team-Based Learning; Dental Materials Science; Hybrid Curriculum; Active Learning; Conceptual Understanding; Clinical Application; Student Perception; Dental Education; Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract

Objectives: There is a significant shift in the Saudi Arabian education system toward implementing innovative teaching and active learning strategies like Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Team-Based Learning (TBL). At the College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (CD-PNU), PBL along with didactic lectures are already part of its hybrid dental program. TBL was incorporated as an instructional strategy from the second to the final year. Since no published study in Saudi Arabia has yet addressed students’ perception of TBL within a dental curriculum, this sequential explanatory mixed-methods study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TBL in fostering conceptual understanding and clinical application of Dental Materials Science. Specifically, we assessed student interest, perceived improvement in learning skills, and attitudes toward TBL as a student-centered methodology.


​Methods: This sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was designed to analyze the inclusion of TBL in the Dental Materials Science course. The instrument was a modified, validated questionnaire covering two main areas: (1) teaching and learning in dental subjects, and (2) opinions towards TBL and its components. Quantitative data were collected using a 5-point Likert scale, with responses grouped into three categories for descriptive analysis. Qualitative data were collected via two open-ended questions concerning the strengths and weaknesses of TBL. Descriptive statistics were used for the quantitative analysis, and thematic content analysis was applied to the open-ended responses, with frequency reporting to quantify the themes.


​Results: A total of 131 students completed the TBL questionnaire (84% response rate). The results indicate that students found positive outcomes, reporting that TBL improved decision-making skills (74% agreement) and competence in self-directed learning (78% agreement). Qualitative themes highlighted the benefits of teamwork, structured preparation, and skills enhancement. Identified weaknesses included variable tutor involvement, content suitability, and the method of group selection.


​Conclusion: TBL can be confidently incorporated with the current teaching methods adopted at CD-PNU. Students largely preferred this active student-centered method and found it satisfactory. The findings support TBL’s utility in improving the conceptual understanding and clinical application skills necessary for Dental Materials Science. However, student concerns regarding session timings, group selection criteria, and need for faculty training require careful attention.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1. Lin GSS, Tan WW, Foong CC. A new attempt of applying hybrid team-based and case-based learning approach in dental materials science: Does it work? Eur J Dent Educ. 2022;27(4):956–62. – Directly relevant hybrid TBL-CBL in dental materials science, reporting positive student perceptions and interactions.
2. Yuetqi L, Sim Siang-Lin G, Mamat R, Noorani TY. Student’s perception of hybrid team-based and case-based learning in undergraduate endodontics education. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:43. – Positive views on hybrid active-learning (TBL+CBL) in dental curriculum, improving engagement and clinical reasoning.
3. Alizadeh M et al. Team-based learning in health professions education: a review of evidence and outcomes (2024). – Reviews evidence on TBL in health education, noting high satisfaction and motivation but gaps in comparative outcomes vs. other active methods.
4. Fatima Alam B, Anwar M, Nayab T, Zaidi SAA, et al. Team-based learning or problem-based learning: which is the best learner-centered approach for undergraduate dental students? AME Med J. 2026;11(2). – Compares TBL with PBL in dental training, useful for framing TBL in a hybrid curriculum context.
5. Sakka S. Student feedback on team-based learning in a preclinical oral surgery course: A pilot study. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024. – Recent application of TBL in dental preclinical teaching with student perception outcomes.
6. Abid S. Integrating hybrid team-based and case-based learning in dental education transformation. Pak J Med Res. 2024. – Discusses hybrid TBL-CBL impacts on teamwork and clinical knowledge, relevant as emerging literature in dental education.
7. Obad AS, Peeran AA, Shareef MA, Alsheikh WJ, Kalagi DA, AlAmodi AA, Khan TA, Shaikh AA, Ganguly P, Yaqinuddin A. Assessment of first-year medical students’ perceptions of teaching and learning through team-based learning sessions. Adv Physiol Educ 40: 536–542, 2016; doi:10.1152/advan.00001.2016.
8. Alamoudi A, Hassanien M, Al Shawwa L, Bima A, Gad H, Tekian A MedEdPublish https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000026.1
9. Anwar K, Shaikh AA, Dash NR, Khurshid S. Comparing the efficacy of Team based learning strategies in a problem-based learning curriculum. APMIS 2012; 120: 718–23.
10. Sawatsky, A. P., Berlacher, K., & Granieri, R. (2014) Using an ACTIVE teaching format versus a standard lecture format for increasing resident interaction and knowledge achievement during noon conference: a prospective, controlled study. BMC Med Educ, 14, 129.
11. Nelson LP, Crow ML. Do Active-Learning Strategies Improve Students’ Critical Thinking? High Educ Stud. 2014;4(2):77–90.
12. Michaelsen LK. Team-based learning in large classes. In: Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD, editors. Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002: 157–71.
13. Berry A. Team‐based learning: from principle to application. University of Central Florida College of Medicine. Available at: https://med.ucf.edu/media/2011/08/tbl1.pdf [Available at: 24-August-2016
14. Majumder A, D’Souza U, Rahman S. Trends in medical education: challenges and directions for need-based reforms of medical training in South-East Asia. Indian J Med Sci 2004;58:369– 80.
15. .Neville AJ, Norman GR. PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. Acad Med. 2007;82:370–4.
16. 10. Cockrell K, Caplow H, Donaldson J. A context for learning: collaborative groups in the problem-based learning environment. Rev Higher Edu 2000;23:347–63.
17. Hunt DP, Haidet P, Coverdale JH, Richards B. The effect of using team learning in an evidence-based medicine course for medical students. Teach Learn Med 15: 131–139, 2003. doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1502_11.
18. Inuwa IM. Perceptions and Attitudes of First-Year Medical Students on a Modified Team-Based Learning (TBL) Strategy in Anatomy. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 12: 336–343, 2012. doi:10.12816/0003148.
19. Haque M, Majumder AA. Team Based Learning in Medical Education – A Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2017; 43(2) :10:59-63
20. Seidel CL, Richards BF. Application of team learning in a medical physiology course. Acad Med 2001; 76:533–4.
21. Touchet BK, Coon KA. A pilot use of team-based learning in psychiatry resident psychodynamic psychotherapy education. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29:293–6.
22. Burges A, Bleasel J, Haq I, Roberts C, Garsia R, Robertson T, Mellis C. Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL? BMC Medical Education (2017) 17:243.
23. Thompson MB, Levine ER, Kennedy F, Naik DA, Foldes AC, Coverdale HJ, P. Kelly AP, Parmelee D, Richards FB, Haidet P. Evaluating the Quality of Learning-Team Processes in Medical Education: Development and Validation of a New Measure. Academic Medicine, Vol. 84, No. 10 / October 2009 Supplement.
24. Burgess, A. W., McGregor, D. M., & Mellis, C. M. (2014) Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review. Acad Med, 89(4), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162
25. Hashmi NR. Team Based Learning (TBL) in Undergraduate Medical Education. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2014, Vol. 24(8): 553-55
26. Anwar K, Shaikh AA, Sajid R.M, Cahusac P, Alarifi A.N, Al Shedoukhy A. Tackling student neurophobia in neurosciences block with team-based learning, Medical Education Online, 2015 20:1, 28461, DOI: 10.3402/meo.v20.28461
27. Fatmi M, Hartling L, Hillier T, Campbell S, Oswald AE. Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):e1608-24. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802
28. Frame, TR, Cailor SM, Gryka, RJ, Chen AM., Kiersma ME & Sheppard L. (2015). Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 79(4), 51. doi:10.5688/ajpe79451
29. 23. E. Yohanan, and K. Revital, “Perceived Classroom Control, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, and Academic Achievement,” Educational Psychology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 249-260, 2003.
30. Hubscher R. Assigning Students to Groups Using General and Context-Specific Criteria. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, pp. 178-189, vol. 3, DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TLT.2010.17
31. Jafari Z. A comparison of conventional lecture and teambased learning methods in terms of student learning and teaching satisfaction. Med J Islam Rep of Iran. 28, 2014, 5.
32. Lamm, MH. Dorneich M, Rover DT. Team-Based Learning in Engineering Classrooms: Feedback Form and Content Adds Value to the Learning Experience. 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference. https://ir.uiowa.edu/aseenmw2014/communication_teaming_and_research_skills/2C/3https://doi.org/10.17077/ aseenmw2014.1026
33. Alduraywish A.A, Mohager 0.M, Alenezi J.M, Nail M.A, Aljafari S.A. Evaluation of students' experience with Problem-based Learning (PBL) applied at the College of Medicine, Al-Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 2017, 67: 1870